Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Return to Sport Testing Passing Rates for Healthy People: A Systematic Review

Audria Wood, Mathew Hargreaves, John N. Manfredi, Maxwell Harrell, Elizabeth Marks Benson, Clay Rahaman, Dev Dayal, Eugene W. Brabston, Thomas Evely, Aaron Casp, Amit M. Momaya
{"title":"Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Return to Sport Testing Passing Rates for Healthy People: A Systematic Review","authors":"Audria Wood, Mathew Hargreaves, John N. Manfredi, Maxwell Harrell, Elizabeth Marks Benson, Clay Rahaman, Dev Dayal, Eugene W. Brabston, Thomas Evely, Aaron Casp, Amit M. Momaya","doi":"10.1177/03635465241313194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Return to sport (RTS) is a common goal after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) but carries a relatively high risk of reinjury with up to 20% to 25% of athletes experiencing graft rupture or contralateral ACL tear. While there is increased emphasis on establishing safe RTS criteria for athletes to return to previous activity levels, studies show that even healthy individuals have difficulty passing RTS testing.Purpose:To synthesize data concerning whether healthy individuals can pass ACLR RTS rehabilitation tests.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:Following the established PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, the authors conducted a systematic literature search in May 2023. Three databases were used in the search (PubMed, EMBASE, and SPORTDiscus) to retrieve all studies that conducted ACLR RTS rehabilitation tests on healthy individuals. Tests included were isometric strength, isokinetic strength, hop, and balance tests. The search was performed in duplicate, and a quality assessment of all studies was included.Results:A total of 1724 studies were retrieved, of which 32 were included, involving 1552 controls with no history of ACL injury. From the studies analyzed, 5.3% to 42.2% of healthy participants failed 6 different hop tests, 15.2% failed the Star Excursion Balance Test, 37% failed the isometric knee flexion test, 50% failed the isometric knee extension test, and 23.7% to 28.9% failed the drop vertical jump test. An asymmetry index ≥10% was found in 6 of the 18 isokinetic tests and 2 of the 14 isometric tests. Hop testing was the most common test in the included studies (56.3%), followed by balance testing (31.3%), isometric strength testing (31.3%), isokinetic strength testing (25%), and drop vertical jump (6.3%).Conclusion:Many healthy individuals fail ACLR RTS tests, with some having an inherent variation from side to side that is >10%. The passing threshold for RTS testing should be a value that is practical yet helps reduce reinjury rates.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241313194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:Return to sport (RTS) is a common goal after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) but carries a relatively high risk of reinjury with up to 20% to 25% of athletes experiencing graft rupture or contralateral ACL tear. While there is increased emphasis on establishing safe RTS criteria for athletes to return to previous activity levels, studies show that even healthy individuals have difficulty passing RTS testing.Purpose:To synthesize data concerning whether healthy individuals can pass ACLR RTS rehabilitation tests.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:Following the established PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, the authors conducted a systematic literature search in May 2023. Three databases were used in the search (PubMed, EMBASE, and SPORTDiscus) to retrieve all studies that conducted ACLR RTS rehabilitation tests on healthy individuals. Tests included were isometric strength, isokinetic strength, hop, and balance tests. The search was performed in duplicate, and a quality assessment of all studies was included.Results:A total of 1724 studies were retrieved, of which 32 were included, involving 1552 controls with no history of ACL injury. From the studies analyzed, 5.3% to 42.2% of healthy participants failed 6 different hop tests, 15.2% failed the Star Excursion Balance Test, 37% failed the isometric knee flexion test, 50% failed the isometric knee extension test, and 23.7% to 28.9% failed the drop vertical jump test. An asymmetry index ≥10% was found in 6 of the 18 isokinetic tests and 2 of the 14 isometric tests. Hop testing was the most common test in the included studies (56.3%), followed by balance testing (31.3%), isometric strength testing (31.3%), isokinetic strength testing (25%), and drop vertical jump (6.3%).Conclusion:Many healthy individuals fail ACLR RTS tests, with some having an inherent variation from side to side that is >10%. The passing threshold for RTS testing should be a value that is practical yet helps reduce reinjury rates.
健康人群前交叉韧带重建恢复运动测试合格率:系统综述
背景:前交叉韧带(ACL)重建(ACLR)后恢复运动(RTS)是一个共同的目标,但有相对较高的再损伤风险,高达20%至25%的运动员经历移植物断裂或对侧ACL撕裂。虽然人们越来越重视建立安全的RTS标准,使运动员恢复到以前的活动水平,但研究表明,即使是健康的人也很难通过RTS测试。目的:综合健康个体能否通过ACLR RTS康复测试的相关数据。研究设计:系统评价;证据等级,4级。方法:根据已建立的PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and meta - analysis)指南,作者于2023年5月进行了系统文献检索。检索中使用了三个数据库(PubMed、EMBASE和SPORTDiscus)来检索对健康个体进行ACLR RTS康复试验的所有研究。测试包括等长强度、等速强度、跳跃和平衡测试。检索一式两份,并纳入所有研究的质量评估。结果:共检索到1724项研究,其中32项纳入,1552名无前交叉韧带损伤史的对照组。从所分析的研究来看,5.3%至42.2%的健康参与者未能通过6种不同的跳跃测试,15.2%的人未能通过星移平衡测试,37%的人未能通过等距膝关节屈曲测试,50%的人未能通过等距膝关节伸展测试,23.7%至28.9%的人未能通过垂直跳跃测试。18项等速试验中6项不对称指数≥10%,14项等速试验中2项不对称指数≥10%。在纳入的研究中,跳跃测试是最常见的测试(56.3%),其次是平衡测试(31.3%)、等距强度测试(31.3%)、等速强度测试(25%)和跌落垂直跳跃(6.3%)。结论:许多健康个体未能通过ACLR RTS测试,其中一些人具有10%左右的固有变异。RTS测试的通过阈值应该是一个实用且有助于减少再伤害率的值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信