Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Return to Sport Testing Passing Rates for Healthy People: A Systematic Review

Audria Wood, Mathew Hargreaves, John N. Manfredi, Maxwell Harrell, Elizabeth Marks Benson, Clay Rahaman, Dev Dayal, Eugene W. Brabston, Thomas Evely, Aaron Casp, Amit M. Momaya
{"title":"Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Return to Sport Testing Passing Rates for Healthy People: A Systematic Review","authors":"Audria Wood, Mathew Hargreaves, John N. Manfredi, Maxwell Harrell, Elizabeth Marks Benson, Clay Rahaman, Dev Dayal, Eugene W. Brabston, Thomas Evely, Aaron Casp, Amit M. Momaya","doi":"10.1177/03635465241313194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Return to sport (RTS) is a common goal after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) but carries a relatively high risk of reinjury with up to 20% to 25% of athletes experiencing graft rupture or contralateral ACL tear. While there is increased emphasis on establishing safe RTS criteria for athletes to return to previous activity levels, studies show that even healthy individuals have difficulty passing RTS testing.Purpose:To synthesize data concerning whether healthy individuals can pass ACLR RTS rehabilitation tests.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:Following the established PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, the authors conducted a systematic literature search in May 2023. Three databases were used in the search (PubMed, EMBASE, and SPORTDiscus) to retrieve all studies that conducted ACLR RTS rehabilitation tests on healthy individuals. Tests included were isometric strength, isokinetic strength, hop, and balance tests. The search was performed in duplicate, and a quality assessment of all studies was included.Results:A total of 1724 studies were retrieved, of which 32 were included, involving 1552 controls with no history of ACL injury. From the studies analyzed, 5.3% to 42.2% of healthy participants failed 6 different hop tests, 15.2% failed the Star Excursion Balance Test, 37% failed the isometric knee flexion test, 50% failed the isometric knee extension test, and 23.7% to 28.9% failed the drop vertical jump test. An asymmetry index ≥10% was found in 6 of the 18 isokinetic tests and 2 of the 14 isometric tests. Hop testing was the most common test in the included studies (56.3%), followed by balance testing (31.3%), isometric strength testing (31.3%), isokinetic strength testing (25%), and drop vertical jump (6.3%).Conclusion:Many healthy individuals fail ACLR RTS tests, with some having an inherent variation from side to side that is >10%. The passing threshold for RTS testing should be a value that is practical yet helps reduce reinjury rates.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241313194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:Return to sport (RTS) is a common goal after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) but carries a relatively high risk of reinjury with up to 20% to 25% of athletes experiencing graft rupture or contralateral ACL tear. While there is increased emphasis on establishing safe RTS criteria for athletes to return to previous activity levels, studies show that even healthy individuals have difficulty passing RTS testing.Purpose:To synthesize data concerning whether healthy individuals can pass ACLR RTS rehabilitation tests.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:Following the established PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, the authors conducted a systematic literature search in May 2023. Three databases were used in the search (PubMed, EMBASE, and SPORTDiscus) to retrieve all studies that conducted ACLR RTS rehabilitation tests on healthy individuals. Tests included were isometric strength, isokinetic strength, hop, and balance tests. The search was performed in duplicate, and a quality assessment of all studies was included.Results:A total of 1724 studies were retrieved, of which 32 were included, involving 1552 controls with no history of ACL injury. From the studies analyzed, 5.3% to 42.2% of healthy participants failed 6 different hop tests, 15.2% failed the Star Excursion Balance Test, 37% failed the isometric knee flexion test, 50% failed the isometric knee extension test, and 23.7% to 28.9% failed the drop vertical jump test. An asymmetry index ≥10% was found in 6 of the 18 isokinetic tests and 2 of the 14 isometric tests. Hop testing was the most common test in the included studies (56.3%), followed by balance testing (31.3%), isometric strength testing (31.3%), isokinetic strength testing (25%), and drop vertical jump (6.3%).Conclusion:Many healthy individuals fail ACLR RTS tests, with some having an inherent variation from side to side that is >10%. The passing threshold for RTS testing should be a value that is practical yet helps reduce reinjury rates.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信