Artificial Intelligence–Enhanced Perfusion Scoring Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Robert J.H. Miller, Paul Kavanagh, Mark Lemley, Joanna X. Liang, Tali Sharir, Andrew J. Einstein, Mathews B. Fish, Terrence D. Ruddy, Philipp A. Kaufmann, Albert J. Sinusas, Edward J. Miller, Timothy M. Bateman, Sharmila Dorbala, Marcelo Di Carli, Sean Hayes, John Friedman, Daniel S. Berman, Damini Dey, Piotr J. Slomka
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence–Enhanced Perfusion Scoring Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging","authors":"Robert J.H. Miller, Paul Kavanagh, Mark Lemley, Joanna X. Liang, Tali Sharir, Andrew J. Einstein, Mathews B. Fish, Terrence D. Ruddy, Philipp A. Kaufmann, Albert J. Sinusas, Edward J. Miller, Timothy M. Bateman, Sharmila Dorbala, Marcelo Di Carli, Sean Hayes, John Friedman, Daniel S. Berman, Damini Dey, Piotr J. Slomka","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.268079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We previously demonstrated that a deep learning (DL) model of myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging improved accuracy for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed to improve the clinical translatability of this artificial intelligence (AI) approach using the results to derive enhanced total perfusion deficit (TPD) and 17-segment summed scores. <strong>Methods:</strong> We used a cohort of patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging within 180 d of invasive coronary angiography. Obstructive CAD was defined as any stenosis of at least 70% or at least 50% in the left main coronary artery. We used per-vessel DL predictions to modulate polar map pixel scores. These transformed polar maps were then used to derive TPD-DL and summed stress score–DL. We compared diagnostic performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). <strong>Results:</strong> In the 555 patients held out for testing, the median age was 65 y (interquartile range, 57–73 y), and 381 (69%) were male. Obstructive CAD was present in 329 (59%) patients. The prediction performance for obstructive CAD of stress TPD-DL (AUC, 0.837; 95% CI, 0.804–0.870) was higher than AI prediction alone (AUC, 0.795; 95% CI, 0.758–0.831; <em>P</em> = 0.005) and traditional stress TPD (AUC, 0.737; 95% CI, 0.696–0.778; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Summed stress score–DL had the second highest prediction performance (AUC, 0.822; 95% CI, 0.788–0.857) and higher AUC than traditional quantitative summed stress score (AUC, 0.728; 95% CI, 0.686–0.769; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). At a threshold of 5%, the sensitivity and specificity of TPD rose from 72% to 79% and from 62% to 70%, respectively. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Integrating AI predictions with traditional quantitative approaches leads to a simplified AI approach, presenting clinicians with familiar measures but operating with higher accuracy than traditional quantitative scoring. This approach may facilitate integration of new AI methods into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We previously demonstrated that a deep learning (DL) model of myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging improved accuracy for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed to improve the clinical translatability of this artificial intelligence (AI) approach using the results to derive enhanced total perfusion deficit (TPD) and 17-segment summed scores. Methods: We used a cohort of patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging within 180 d of invasive coronary angiography. Obstructive CAD was defined as any stenosis of at least 70% or at least 50% in the left main coronary artery. We used per-vessel DL predictions to modulate polar map pixel scores. These transformed polar maps were then used to derive TPD-DL and summed stress score–DL. We compared diagnostic performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: In the 555 patients held out for testing, the median age was 65 y (interquartile range, 57–73 y), and 381 (69%) were male. Obstructive CAD was present in 329 (59%) patients. The prediction performance for obstructive CAD of stress TPD-DL (AUC, 0.837; 95% CI, 0.804–0.870) was higher than AI prediction alone (AUC, 0.795; 95% CI, 0.758–0.831; P = 0.005) and traditional stress TPD (AUC, 0.737; 95% CI, 0.696–0.778; P < 0.001). Summed stress score–DL had the second highest prediction performance (AUC, 0.822; 95% CI, 0.788–0.857) and higher AUC than traditional quantitative summed stress score (AUC, 0.728; 95% CI, 0.686–0.769; P < 0.001). At a threshold of 5%, the sensitivity and specificity of TPD rose from 72% to 79% and from 62% to 70%, respectively. Conclusion: Integrating AI predictions with traditional quantitative approaches leads to a simplified AI approach, presenting clinicians with familiar measures but operating with higher accuracy than traditional quantitative scoring. This approach may facilitate integration of new AI methods into clinical practice.

人工智能增强灌注评分提高心肌灌注成像的诊断准确性
我们之前证明了心肌灌注SPECT成像的深度学习(DL)模型提高了检测阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的准确性。我们的目的是提高这种人工智能(AI)方法的临床可翻译性,通过结果得出增强的总灌注缺陷(TPD)和17段总评分。方法:我们选择了一组在有创冠状动脉造影后180天内进行心肌灌注成像的患者。梗阻性CAD定义为左冠状动脉主动脉狭窄至少70%或50%。我们使用每艘船的深度学习预测来调节极地地图像素分数。然后使用这些转换后的极坐标图推导TPD-DL和应力得分- dl。我们使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)来比较诊断性能。结果:在555名接受检测的患者中,中位年龄为65岁(四分位数范围为57-73岁),其中381名(69%)为男性。329例(59%)患者存在阻塞性CAD。应力TPD-DL对阻塞性CAD的预测性能(AUC, 0.837;95% CI, 0.804-0.870)高于单纯人工智能预测(AUC, 0.795;95% ci, 0.758-0.831;P = 0.005)和传统应力TPD (AUC, 0.737;95% ci, 0.696-0.778;P & lt;0.001)。综合应力评分- dl预测性能第二高(AUC, 0.822;95% CI, 0.788-0.857),且AUC高于传统的定量应激总分(AUC, 0.728;95% ci, 0.686-0.769;P & lt;0.001)。在5%的阈值下,TPD的敏感性和特异性分别从72%和62%上升到79%和70%。结论:将人工智能预测与传统的定量方法相结合,可以简化人工智能方法,为临床医生提供熟悉的测量方法,但比传统的定量评分具有更高的准确性。这种方法可以促进新的人工智能方法融入临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信