Usefulness of Lumped Kinetic Modeling.

Chem & Bio Engineering Pub Date : 2024-04-30 eCollection Date: 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1021/cbe.4c00032
Sebastian-Mark Lorbach, Andreas Erwin Lechleitner, Fabian Zapf, Markus Lehner
{"title":"Usefulness of Lumped Kinetic Modeling.","authors":"Sebastian-Mark Lorbach, Andreas Erwin Lechleitner, Fabian Zapf, Markus Lehner","doi":"10.1021/cbe.4c00032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chemical recycling of plastic wastes through pyrolysis, gasification, or partial oxidation is a promising alternative to landfill disposal and incineration which must be applied in a future circular economy. These technologies enable the chemical industry, which currently heavily relies on crude oil, to obtain necessary chemical feedstock from postconsumer plastic waste. Kinetic models of pyrolysis and gasification reactions are required to dimension and design these processes on an industrial scale. The creation of detailed kinetic networks is often not feasible due to their complexity in this application, which is when the lumped kinetic modeling approach is used. This work develops and compares five lumped kinetic models for the co-pyrolysis of LDPE with a heavy petroleum fraction in a tubular reactor. A priori lumping is used for four models, and the fifth is created using a posteriori principle whereby in each model the product mixture is defined by eight lumps distinguished by their boiling point. The aim of this work is to compare different approaches for modeling reaction pathways in lumped kinetic models and to identify their impact on the predictive accuracy of the model. It was shown that all of the modeling approaches and the resulting models have similar prediction accuracies and deviations but with different kinetic parameters. Each model was used for a scale-up of an industrial-sized reactor to check whether the model had an influence on the design or predicted operation of the reactor.</p>","PeriodicalId":100230,"journal":{"name":"Chem & Bio Engineering","volume":"1 7","pages":"623-632"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11835281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chem & Bio Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/cbe.4c00032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chemical recycling of plastic wastes through pyrolysis, gasification, or partial oxidation is a promising alternative to landfill disposal and incineration which must be applied in a future circular economy. These technologies enable the chemical industry, which currently heavily relies on crude oil, to obtain necessary chemical feedstock from postconsumer plastic waste. Kinetic models of pyrolysis and gasification reactions are required to dimension and design these processes on an industrial scale. The creation of detailed kinetic networks is often not feasible due to their complexity in this application, which is when the lumped kinetic modeling approach is used. This work develops and compares five lumped kinetic models for the co-pyrolysis of LDPE with a heavy petroleum fraction in a tubular reactor. A priori lumping is used for four models, and the fifth is created using a posteriori principle whereby in each model the product mixture is defined by eight lumps distinguished by their boiling point. The aim of this work is to compare different approaches for modeling reaction pathways in lumped kinetic models and to identify their impact on the predictive accuracy of the model. It was shown that all of the modeling approaches and the resulting models have similar prediction accuracies and deviations but with different kinetic parameters. Each model was used for a scale-up of an industrial-sized reactor to check whether the model had an influence on the design or predicted operation of the reactor.

通过热解、气化或部分氧化对塑料废弃物进行化学回收利用,是替代垃圾填埋和焚烧的一种很有前途的方法,在未来的循环经济中必须加以应用。这些技术使目前严重依赖原油的化学工业能够从消费后塑料废弃物中获得必要的化学原料。需要热解和气化反应的动力学模型,以便在工业规模上对这些工艺进行测量和设计。在这种应用中,建立详细的动力学网络往往因其复杂性而不可行,这时就需要使用整块动力学建模方法。本研究针对管式反应器中低密度聚乙烯与重质石油馏分的共热解,开发并比较了五种集合动力学模型。其中四个模型采用先验叠加法,第五个模型采用后验法,在每个模型中,产品混合物由八个块状物定义,并按其沸点加以区分。这项工作的目的是比较块状动力学模型中不同的反应路径建模方法,并确定它们对模型预测准确性的影响。结果表明,所有建模方法和由此产生的模型具有相似的预测精度和偏差,但动力学参数不同。每个模型都用于工业规模反应器的放大,以检验模型是否对反应器的设计或预测运行产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信