Interventions in primary care to increase uptake of adult vaccines: a systematic review.

Stephanie G Wheeler, Lauren A Beste, Maryann K Overland, Pandora L Wander
{"title":"Interventions in primary care to increase uptake of adult vaccines: a systematic review.","authors":"Stephanie G Wheeler, Lauren A Beste, Maryann K Overland, Pandora L Wander","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a significant gap in understanding which strategies effectively enhance vaccination rates for recommended adult vaccines in primary care settings. This review aimed to identify interventions in outpatient clinics that increase vaccination rates for commonly recommended adult vaccines and describe the change in vaccination rate associated with each intervention aimed at increasing vaccination rates in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic searches identified randomized, controlled trials aiming to increase the rate of vaccination in adults in outpatient clinics. Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched. Two reviewers independently extracted relevant data and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analysis was not done due to heterogeneity of data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four RCTs met inclusion criteria. Clinician reminders to order vaccine increased vaccination 4%-32%. Electronic health record (EHR) prompts to patients or physicians increased vaccination 1%-16%. Bundled interventions increased vaccination 4%-42%, with more intensive interventions associated with higher increases. RCT of interventions involving face-to-face contact with patients increased vaccinations 6%-17%. Group outpatient visits increased vaccination 13%-17%, home visits 6%-17%, and physician or nurse recommendation 15%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinics may increase vaccination rates by reminding doctors to order vaccine, promoting face-to-face conversations about vaccination, and instituting bundled clinic process improvements. EHR prompts may be less effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":94107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"222-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaf008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a significant gap in understanding which strategies effectively enhance vaccination rates for recommended adult vaccines in primary care settings. This review aimed to identify interventions in outpatient clinics that increase vaccination rates for commonly recommended adult vaccines and describe the change in vaccination rate associated with each intervention aimed at increasing vaccination rates in adults.

Methods: Systematic searches identified randomized, controlled trials aiming to increase the rate of vaccination in adults in outpatient clinics. Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched. Two reviewers independently extracted relevant data and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analysis was not done due to heterogeneity of data.

Results: Forty-four RCTs met inclusion criteria. Clinician reminders to order vaccine increased vaccination 4%-32%. Electronic health record (EHR) prompts to patients or physicians increased vaccination 1%-16%. Bundled interventions increased vaccination 4%-42%, with more intensive interventions associated with higher increases. RCT of interventions involving face-to-face contact with patients increased vaccinations 6%-17%. Group outpatient visits increased vaccination 13%-17%, home visits 6%-17%, and physician or nurse recommendation 15%.

Conclusions: Clinics may increase vaccination rates by reminding doctors to order vaccine, promoting face-to-face conversations about vaccination, and instituting bundled clinic process improvements. EHR prompts may be less effective.

在初级保健中采取干预措施以增加成人疫苗的吸收:一项系统评价。
背景:在了解哪些策略有效提高初级保健机构推荐的成人疫苗的接种率方面存在重大差距。本综述旨在确定门诊诊所的干预措施,以提高通常推荐的成人疫苗的接种率,并描述旨在提高成人疫苗接种率的每种干预措施在接种率方面的变化。方法:系统检索确定了旨在提高门诊成人疫苗接种率的随机对照试验。按照PRISMA指南,检索PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL和Cochrane中央对照试验注册库(Central)。两名审稿人独立提取相关数据并评估偏倚风险。由于数据的异质性,未进行meta分析。结果:44项rct符合纳入标准。临床医生提醒订购疫苗使疫苗接种率提高4%-32%。电子健康记录(EHR)提示患者或医生增加1%-16%的疫苗接种率。捆绑干预措施使疫苗接种率提高了4%-42%,干预力度越大,接种率就越高。与患者面对面接触的干预措施的随机对照试验增加了6%-17%的疫苗接种。集体门诊增加了13%-17%的疫苗接种率,家访增加了6%-17%,医生或护士推荐增加了15%。结论:诊所可以通过提醒医生订购疫苗、促进面对面的疫苗接种对话以及建立捆绑的诊所流程改进来提高疫苗接种率。电子病历提示可能不太有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信