Clinical application of subharmonic aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) in the assessment of portal hypertension in patients with decompensated cirrhosis: A pilot study.
Yunlin Huang, Xiuyun Lu, Feihang Wang, Jiaying Cao, Ying Wang, Juan Cheng, Yi Dong, Wenping Wang
{"title":"Clinical application of subharmonic aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) in the assessment of portal hypertension in patients with decompensated cirrhosis: A pilot study.","authors":"Yunlin Huang, Xiuyun Lu, Feihang Wang, Jiaying Cao, Ying Wang, Juan Cheng, Yi Dong, Wenping Wang","doi":"10.1177/13860291241304056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the study was to explore the possibility of subharmonic aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) measurement for noninvasive evaluation of portal hypertension in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with decompensated liver cirrhosis were prospectively enrolled. SHAPE measurement was performed by using an ultrasound system. A continuous infusion of sonazoid at a rate of 0.18 ml/kg/h and saline at 120 ml/h was performed. The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) value are the gold standard for evaluating portal hypertension. The Pearson coefficient and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From February 2023 to August 2023, 15 patients (mean age, 61.1 ± 8.3 years; eight men and seven women) were included. The correlation coefficient of the SHAPE gradient and HVPG was 0.33. The mean SHAPE gradient of patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) (HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg) was significantly higher than that of patients with lower risk (0.5 ± 4.4 dB vs. -7.4 ± 5.1 dB, <i>P</i> = 0.01). Patients with increased risk for variceal hemorrhage (HVPG ≥ 12 mmHg) had a significantly higher mean SHAPE gradient than patients with lower risk (HVPG < 12 mmHg) (1.3 ± 4.4 dB vs. -5.9 ± 4.8 dB; <i>P</i> = 0.01). The optimal cut-off values of the SHAPE gradient for diagnosing patients with CSPH and at increased risk for variceal hemorrhage were -1.3 dB and -0.6 dB (both AUC = 0.89), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SHAPE measurement is a potential noninvasive, effective imaging method to evaluate portal hypertension among patients diagnosed with decompensated liver cirrhosis in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":93943,"journal":{"name":"Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation","volume":" ","pages":"13860291241304056"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13860291241304056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to explore the possibility of subharmonic aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) measurement for noninvasive evaluation of portal hypertension in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis.
Materials and methods: Patients diagnosed with decompensated liver cirrhosis were prospectively enrolled. SHAPE measurement was performed by using an ultrasound system. A continuous infusion of sonazoid at a rate of 0.18 ml/kg/h and saline at 120 ml/h was performed. The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) value are the gold standard for evaluating portal hypertension. The Pearson coefficient and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were analyzed.
Results: From February 2023 to August 2023, 15 patients (mean age, 61.1 ± 8.3 years; eight men and seven women) were included. The correlation coefficient of the SHAPE gradient and HVPG was 0.33. The mean SHAPE gradient of patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) (HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg) was significantly higher than that of patients with lower risk (0.5 ± 4.4 dB vs. -7.4 ± 5.1 dB, P = 0.01). Patients with increased risk for variceal hemorrhage (HVPG ≥ 12 mmHg) had a significantly higher mean SHAPE gradient than patients with lower risk (HVPG < 12 mmHg) (1.3 ± 4.4 dB vs. -5.9 ± 4.8 dB; P = 0.01). The optimal cut-off values of the SHAPE gradient for diagnosing patients with CSPH and at increased risk for variceal hemorrhage were -1.3 dB and -0.6 dB (both AUC = 0.89), respectively.
Conclusion: SHAPE measurement is a potential noninvasive, effective imaging method to evaluate portal hypertension among patients diagnosed with decompensated liver cirrhosis in clinical practice.
目的:本研究的目的是探讨亚谐波辅助压力估计(SHAPE)测量在肝硬化失代偿患者门静脉高压无创评估中的可行性。材料和方法:前瞻性纳入诊断为失代偿性肝硬化的患者。利用超声系统进行形状测量。以0.18 ml/kg/h的速率持续输注索那唑,以120 ml/h的速率持续输注生理盐水。肝静脉压梯度(HVPG)值是评价门静脉高压症的金标准。分析了皮尔逊系数和受试者工作特征曲线下面积。结果:2023年2月~ 2023年8月,15例患者(平均年龄61.1±8.3岁;包括8名男性和7名女性。SHAPE梯度与HVPG的相关系数为0.33。有临床意义的门脉高压(CSPH) (HVPG≥10 mmHg)患者的平均SHAPE梯度显著高于低危患者(0.5±4.4 dB vs -7.4±5.1 dB, P = 0.01)。静脉曲张出血(HVPG≥12 mmHg)风险增加的患者的平均SHAPE梯度显著高于风险较低(HVPG < 12 mmHg)的患者(1.3±4.4 dB vs -5.9±4.8 dB;P = 0.01)。诊断CSPH患者和静脉曲张出血风险增加患者的最佳SHAPE梯度临界值分别为-1.3 dB和-0.6 dB (AUC均为0.89)。结论:SHAPE测量在临床诊断为失代偿期肝硬化患者中是一种潜在的无创、有效的门静脉高压影像学评价方法。