Comparative Evaluation of Intralesional Injection of Botulinum Toxin Type A versus Triamcinolone Acetonide in Treating Post-Burn Pruritus.

Seyed Saheb Hoseininejad, Roozbeh Rahbar, Mahtab Farhadi, Shahram Godarzi
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Intralesional Injection of Botulinum Toxin Type A <i>versus</i> Triamcinolone Acetonide in Treating Post-Burn Pruritus.","authors":"Seyed Saheb Hoseininejad, Roozbeh Rahbar, Mahtab Farhadi, Shahram Godarzi","doi":"10.26574/maedica.2024.19.4.763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Pathological scars resulting from burns can impair both aesthetic and physical functions, often causing chronic pruritus. Thus, this study aimed to compare the effectiveness of intralesional botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) and triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) in reducing pruritus and scar thickness caused by burns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-blind clinical trial was conducted on 60 patients experiencing post-burn pruritus. Patients selected a scar area with the highest degree of pruritus, which was divided into two equal parts. BTX-A was injected into one half and TAC into the other. Pruritus severity was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), the pain was assessed using the numeric rating scale (NRS), and scar thickness and the Vancouver scar scale (VSS) scores were at four time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 60 patients with a mean age of 35.72 years (range: 21-64 years). The results indicated that BTX-A was more effective than TAC in reducing scar thickness and pruritus. Changes in scar thickness from V1 to V4 demonstrated that BTX-A achieved more significant scar reduction than TAC (P=0.0287), and pruritus severity decreased significantly in the BTX-A group (P=0.0482).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the results, BTX-A treatment is more effective than TAC in reducing pruritus and scar thickness in patients with chronic post-burn pruritus. Further studies with larger sample sizes and extended follow-up periods are required to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74094,"journal":{"name":"Maedica","volume":"19 4","pages":"763-768"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maedica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2024.19.4.763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Pathological scars resulting from burns can impair both aesthetic and physical functions, often causing chronic pruritus. Thus, this study aimed to compare the effectiveness of intralesional botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) and triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) in reducing pruritus and scar thickness caused by burns.

Methods: This single-blind clinical trial was conducted on 60 patients experiencing post-burn pruritus. Patients selected a scar area with the highest degree of pruritus, which was divided into two equal parts. BTX-A was injected into one half and TAC into the other. Pruritus severity was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), the pain was assessed using the numeric rating scale (NRS), and scar thickness and the Vancouver scar scale (VSS) scores were at four time points.

Results: The study involved 60 patients with a mean age of 35.72 years (range: 21-64 years). The results indicated that BTX-A was more effective than TAC in reducing scar thickness and pruritus. Changes in scar thickness from V1 to V4 demonstrated that BTX-A achieved more significant scar reduction than TAC (P=0.0287), and pruritus severity decreased significantly in the BTX-A group (P=0.0482).

Conclusion: Based on the results, BTX-A treatment is more effective than TAC in reducing pruritus and scar thickness in patients with chronic post-burn pruritus. Further studies with larger sample sizes and extended follow-up periods are required to confirm these findings.

A型肉毒毒素与曲安奈德局部注射治疗烧伤后瘙痒的比较评价。
背景和目的:烧伤引起的病理性疤痕可损害审美和身体功能,常引起慢性瘙痒。因此,本研究旨在比较A型肉毒毒素(BTX-A)和曲安奈德(TAC)在减轻烧伤引起的瘙痒和疤痕厚度方面的效果。方法:对60例烧伤后瘙痒患者进行单盲临床试验。患者选择瘙痒程度最高的疤痕区域,等分两部分。BTX-A注射到一半,TAC注射到另一半。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估瘙痒严重程度,使用数值评定量表(NRS)评估疼痛,并在四个时间点进行疤痕厚度和温哥华疤痕量表(VSS)评分。结果:研究纳入60例患者,平均年龄35.72岁(范围21-64岁)。结果表明,BTX-A在减轻瘢痕厚度和瘙痒方面比TAC更有效。从V1到V4的疤痕厚度变化表明,BTX-A组的疤痕减少效果比TAC更显著(P=0.0287),瘙痒严重程度明显降低(P=0.0482)。结论:BTX-A在减轻慢性烧伤后瘙痒患者的瘙痒和瘢痕厚度方面比TAC更有效。进一步的研究需要更大的样本量和更长的随访期来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信