Diagnostic and prognostic value of cystatin C in acute coronary syndrome: An up-to-date meta-analysis.

Michal Pruc, Damian Swieczkowski, Basar Cander, Milosz J Jaguszewski, Sagar Galwankar, Salvatore Di Somma, Fatimah Lateef, Indrani Sardesai, Ayman El-Menyar, Michal Zembala, Jacek Kubica, Togay Evrin, Burak Katipoglu, Zubaid Rafique, Frank William Peacock, Lukasz Szarpak
{"title":"Diagnostic and prognostic value of cystatin C in acute coronary syndrome: An up-to-date meta-analysis.","authors":"Michal Pruc, Damian Swieczkowski, Basar Cander, Milosz J Jaguszewski, Sagar Galwankar, Salvatore Di Somma, Fatimah Lateef, Indrani Sardesai, Ayman El-Menyar, Michal Zembala, Jacek Kubica, Togay Evrin, Burak Katipoglu, Zubaid Rafique, Frank William Peacock, Lukasz Szarpak","doi":"10.5603/cj.102453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of Cystatin C (CysC) in the diagnosis and prognosis of cardiovascular disease, particularly acute coronary syndrome (ACS), is increasingly significant. The goal of this meta-analysis was to assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of CysC in patients with ACS, as well as its association with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as mortality, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. Using PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase, a literature review of cohort and case control studies reporting MACE and using the terms ACS and Cystatin C was conducted, excluding studies published after August 1, 2024. the meta-analysis using a random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CysC concentrations were significantly higher in patients with ACS compared to controls [mean difference (MD) = 0.36, p < 0.001], and in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) vs. unstable angina (MD = 0.18, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Patients with MACE had higher CysC levels than those without (MD = 0.25, p < 0.001). Hospital survivors had lower CysC levels compared to those who died (MD = -0.25, p < 0.001). Higher CysC concentrations were associated with increased risks of MACE, cardiac death, overall mortality, myocardial reinfarction, and stroke, both during hospitalization and beyond.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CysC is a promising biomarker for both diagnosis and prognosis in patients with ACS, especially in the context of predicting MACE, mortality and heart failure risk. The use of CysC may improve risk stratification and support therapeutic decision-making in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":93923,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/cj.102453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The role of Cystatin C (CysC) in the diagnosis and prognosis of cardiovascular disease, particularly acute coronary syndrome (ACS), is increasingly significant. The goal of this meta-analysis was to assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of CysC in patients with ACS, as well as its association with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as mortality, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke.

Methods: The present study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. Using PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase, a literature review of cohort and case control studies reporting MACE and using the terms ACS and Cystatin C was conducted, excluding studies published after August 1, 2024. the meta-analysis using a random effects model.

Results: CysC concentrations were significantly higher in patients with ACS compared to controls [mean difference (MD) = 0.36, p < 0.001], and in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) vs. unstable angina (MD = 0.18, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Patients with MACE had higher CysC levels than those without (MD = 0.25, p < 0.001). Hospital survivors had lower CysC levels compared to those who died (MD = -0.25, p < 0.001). Higher CysC concentrations were associated with increased risks of MACE, cardiac death, overall mortality, myocardial reinfarction, and stroke, both during hospitalization and beyond.

Conclusions: CysC is a promising biomarker for both diagnosis and prognosis in patients with ACS, especially in the context of predicting MACE, mortality and heart failure risk. The use of CysC may improve risk stratification and support therapeutic decision-making in clinical practice.

胱抑素C在急性冠脉综合征中的诊断和预后价值:一项最新的荟萃分析。
背景:胱抑素C (Cystatin C, CysC)在心血管疾病尤其是急性冠脉综合征(ACS)的诊断和预后中的作用越来越重要。本荟萃分析的目的是评估CysC在ACS患者中的诊断和预后价值,以及它与主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的关系,MACE定义为死亡率、心肌梗死、心力衰竭和卒中。方法:本研究采用系统综述和荟萃分析。使用PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library和Embase,对报道MACE并使用ACS和Cystatin C术语的队列和病例对照研究进行了文献综述,排除了2024年8月1日之后发表的研究。meta分析采用随机效应模型。结果:ACS患者的CysC浓度显著高于对照组[平均差异(MD) = 0.36, p < 0.001],急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的CysC浓度显著高于不稳定型心绞痛(MD = 0.18, p < 0.001)。ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)之间无显著差异。MACE患者的CysC水平高于无MACE患者(MD = 0.25, p < 0.001)。与死亡患者相比,住院幸存者的CysC水平较低(MD = -0.25, p < 0.001)。较高的CysC浓度与住院期间和住院后MACE、心源性死亡、总死亡率、心肌再梗死和卒中的风险增加相关。结论:CysC在ACS患者的诊断和预后方面是一个很有前景的生物标志物,特别是在预测MACE、死亡率和心力衰竭风险方面。在临床实践中,使用CysC可以改善风险分层和支持治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信