Aikaterini D Lianou, Elena Dragioti, Stefanos Mantzoukas, Mary Gouva
{"title":"Psychosomatic Dimensions of Rhinoplasty and Their Role in Quality of Life and Self-Care.","authors":"Aikaterini D Lianou, Elena Dragioti, Stefanos Mantzoukas, Mary Gouva","doi":"10.26574/maedica.2024.19.4.836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rhinoplasty, one of the most prevalent facial plastic surgeries, bears both functional and aesthetic import. This literature review examined the psychosomatic dimensions of rhinoplasty and their influence on patients' quality of life and self-care. Rhinoplasty, whether undertaken alone or in conjunction with septoplasty, is intricate and technically demanding, with success being largely contingent upon psychosomatic factors. The popularity of rhinoplasty has burgeoned due to augmented social acceptance and media exposure. Postoperative psychological outcomes vary, with dissatisfaction being frequently linked to pre-existing psychopathology. Men often exhibit higher levels of psychopathology and are less satisfied after surgery comparatively to women. Prudent patient selection, realistic expectations and psychological screening are imperative for successful outcomes. Rhinoplasty affects individuals of all ages, from adolescents to the elderly, with involving unique concerns and benefits. Patient satisfaction hinges on factors such as gender, age, education, culture, ethnicity, occupation, economic profile, psychological profile and expectations. The use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) is indispensable for evaluating the health-related quality of life and psychosocial changes following rhinoplasty. Comprehending these dimensions is crucial for enhancing patient satisfaction and ensuring successful outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":74094,"journal":{"name":"Maedica","volume":"19 4","pages":"836-841"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834851/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maedica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2024.19.4.836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rhinoplasty, one of the most prevalent facial plastic surgeries, bears both functional and aesthetic import. This literature review examined the psychosomatic dimensions of rhinoplasty and their influence on patients' quality of life and self-care. Rhinoplasty, whether undertaken alone or in conjunction with septoplasty, is intricate and technically demanding, with success being largely contingent upon psychosomatic factors. The popularity of rhinoplasty has burgeoned due to augmented social acceptance and media exposure. Postoperative psychological outcomes vary, with dissatisfaction being frequently linked to pre-existing psychopathology. Men often exhibit higher levels of psychopathology and are less satisfied after surgery comparatively to women. Prudent patient selection, realistic expectations and psychological screening are imperative for successful outcomes. Rhinoplasty affects individuals of all ages, from adolescents to the elderly, with involving unique concerns and benefits. Patient satisfaction hinges on factors such as gender, age, education, culture, ethnicity, occupation, economic profile, psychological profile and expectations. The use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) is indispensable for evaluating the health-related quality of life and psychosocial changes following rhinoplasty. Comprehending these dimensions is crucial for enhancing patient satisfaction and ensuring successful outcomes.