Impact of the hierarchical medical system on the perceived quality of primary care in China: a quasi-experimental study.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yaxin Zhao, Xiaohui Zhai, Zhongliang Zhou, Zixuan Peng, Chi Shen, Xiaojing Fan, Sha Lai, Peter C Coyte
{"title":"Impact of the hierarchical medical system on the perceived quality of primary care in China: a quasi-experimental study.","authors":"Yaxin Zhao, Xiaohui Zhai, Zhongliang Zhou, Zixuan Peng, Chi Shen, Xiaojing Fan, Sha Lai, Peter C Coyte","doi":"10.1186/s41256-024-00398-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the implementation of a hierarchical medical system (HMS) has been shown to improve the allocation of medical resources and patient health-seeking behaviour, its role in patient's perceived quality of primary care remains unexplored. This study aimed to assess the impact of HMS implementation on rural and urban residents' perceived quality of primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from the China Family Panel Study for 2012, 2014, 2016, and 2018. A total of 40,011 rural and 22,482 urban residents were included in the research participants for analysis. This study adopted a quasi-natural experimental design, and the multiple-period difference-in-differences method was used to capture changes in patient's perceived quality of primary care before and after the introduction of HMS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that HMS implementation declined the perceived quality of primary care by an average of 18% among rural residents (OR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99), while there was no significant change among urban residents (OR: 1.13, 95% CI 0.87-1.46). There was a 24% reduction in the perceived quality of primary care (OR: 0.76, 95% CI 0.61-0.96) one year after HMS among rural residents, and there was no statistically significant difference two years after HMS. After HMS implementation, the level of perceived quality of primary care by rural patients with chronic diseases decreased by 72% (OR: 0.28, 95% CI 0.11-0.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HMS has a limited effect on improving residents' perceived quality of primary care, especially for those living in rural areas. Policymakers are suggested to establish a quality monitoring system that incorporates patient experience as an essential standard to systematically evaluate the impacts of the HMS, with more efforts being put into helping vulnerable groups such as residents under 60 years old and patients with chronic diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":52405,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Research and Policy","volume":"10 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-024-00398-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although the implementation of a hierarchical medical system (HMS) has been shown to improve the allocation of medical resources and patient health-seeking behaviour, its role in patient's perceived quality of primary care remains unexplored. This study aimed to assess the impact of HMS implementation on rural and urban residents' perceived quality of primary care.

Methods: Data were obtained from the China Family Panel Study for 2012, 2014, 2016, and 2018. A total of 40,011 rural and 22,482 urban residents were included in the research participants for analysis. This study adopted a quasi-natural experimental design, and the multiple-period difference-in-differences method was used to capture changes in patient's perceived quality of primary care before and after the introduction of HMS.

Results: We found that HMS implementation declined the perceived quality of primary care by an average of 18% among rural residents (OR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99), while there was no significant change among urban residents (OR: 1.13, 95% CI 0.87-1.46). There was a 24% reduction in the perceived quality of primary care (OR: 0.76, 95% CI 0.61-0.96) one year after HMS among rural residents, and there was no statistically significant difference two years after HMS. After HMS implementation, the level of perceived quality of primary care by rural patients with chronic diseases decreased by 72% (OR: 0.28, 95% CI 0.11-0.78).

Conclusions: HMS has a limited effect on improving residents' perceived quality of primary care, especially for those living in rural areas. Policymakers are suggested to establish a quality monitoring system that incorporates patient experience as an essential standard to systematically evaluate the impacts of the HMS, with more efforts being put into helping vulnerable groups such as residents under 60 years old and patients with chronic diseases.

分级医疗制度对中国初级保健感知质量的影响:一项准实验研究。
背景:虽然分级医疗系统(HMS)的实施已被证明可以改善医疗资源的分配和患者的求医行为,但其在患者感知的初级保健质量中的作用仍未被探索。本研究旨在评估医疗服务管理系统实施对城乡居民初级保健感知质量的影响。方法:数据来自2012年、2014年、2016年和2018年的中国家庭面板研究。共有4011名农村居民和22482名城市居民被纳入研究对象进行分析。本研究采用准自然实验设计,采用多期差中差法捕捉HMS引入前后患者对初级保健感知质量的变化。结果:我们发现HMS的实施使农村居民对初级保健的感知质量平均下降了18% (OR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99),而在城市居民中没有显著变化(OR: 1.13, 95% CI 0.87-1.46)。在HMS后1年,农村居民对初级保健质量的感知下降了24% (OR: 0.76, 95% CI 0.61-0.96),而在HMS后2年,差异无统计学意义。实施HMS后,农村慢性病患者对初级保健的感知质量水平下降了72% (OR: 0.28, 95% CI 0.11-0.78)。结论:HMS对提高居民初级保健感知质量的作用有限,特别是对农村地区的居民。建议政策制定者建立一个质量监测体系,将患者体验作为系统评估医疗卫生服务影响的重要标准,并加大对60岁以下居民和慢性病患者等弱势群体的帮助力度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Health Research and Policy
Global Health Research and Policy Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
1.10%
发文量
43
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health Research and Policy, an open-access, multidisciplinary journal, publishes research on various aspects of global health, addressing topics like health equity, health systems and policy, social determinants of health, disease burden, population health, and other urgent global health issues. It serves as a forum for high-quality research focused on regional and global health improvement, emphasizing solutions for health equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信