The morphology of the oval window in Paranthropus robustus compared to humans and other modern primates.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Ruy Fernandez, José Braga
{"title":"The morphology of the oval window in Paranthropus robustus compared to humans and other modern primates.","authors":"Ruy Fernandez, José Braga","doi":"10.1002/ar.25644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The oval window (OW) is an opening connecting the inner and middle ear. Its area has been shown to consistently scale with body mass (BM) in primates, and has been used alongside semi-circular canal (SCC) size to differentiate Homo sapiens and fossil hominins, including Paranthropus robustus. However, while the morphology of other inner ear elements, such as cochlea and SCCs, has been extensively studied in primates, OW shape has received little attention. In this study, we assess OW morphological variability in extant primates, and compare P. robustus to extant hominids. The potential of OW size to predict BM is also assessed. For this, measurements were performed on 3D scans from extant primate species and of P. robustus from the sites of Kromdraai, Swartkrans, and Drimolen. Size was assessed using perimeter (OWP), area (OWA), and centroid size (OWCS). Shape was assessed using geometric morphometric methods. The OW has no sexual dimorphism; there is no size difference between juveniles and adults, but there is a slight shape difference between human juveniles and adults, with a seemingly opposite ontogenetic trajectory compared to other primates. P. robustus has an intermediary OW shape between apes and humans, with more ape-like specimens from Kromdraai and more human-like ones from Drimolen. Overall, OW morphology discriminates primate species well enough, especially H. sapiens. BM is well explained by OWA, but OWA is not reliable as a BM proxy due to high prediction errors. Nonetheless, the OWA of P. robustus suggests a BM close to that of a chimpanzee.</p>","PeriodicalId":50965,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.25644","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The oval window (OW) is an opening connecting the inner and middle ear. Its area has been shown to consistently scale with body mass (BM) in primates, and has been used alongside semi-circular canal (SCC) size to differentiate Homo sapiens and fossil hominins, including Paranthropus robustus. However, while the morphology of other inner ear elements, such as cochlea and SCCs, has been extensively studied in primates, OW shape has received little attention. In this study, we assess OW morphological variability in extant primates, and compare P. robustus to extant hominids. The potential of OW size to predict BM is also assessed. For this, measurements were performed on 3D scans from extant primate species and of P. robustus from the sites of Kromdraai, Swartkrans, and Drimolen. Size was assessed using perimeter (OWP), area (OWA), and centroid size (OWCS). Shape was assessed using geometric morphometric methods. The OW has no sexual dimorphism; there is no size difference between juveniles and adults, but there is a slight shape difference between human juveniles and adults, with a seemingly opposite ontogenetic trajectory compared to other primates. P. robustus has an intermediary OW shape between apes and humans, with more ape-like specimens from Kromdraai and more human-like ones from Drimolen. Overall, OW morphology discriminates primate species well enough, especially H. sapiens. BM is well explained by OWA, but OWA is not reliable as a BM proxy due to high prediction errors. Nonetheless, the OWA of P. robustus suggests a BM close to that of a chimpanzee.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
15.00%
发文量
266
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Anatomical Record
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信