Caregiving outcomes among informal caregivers of persons with multimorbidity and dementia: a scoping review.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
European Geriatric Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1007/s41999-024-01150-3
Ruotong Liu, Katherine Peak, Em Trubits, Ana R Quiñones
{"title":"Caregiving outcomes among informal caregivers of persons with multimorbidity and dementia: a scoping review.","authors":"Ruotong Liu, Katherine Peak, Em Trubits, Ana R Quiñones","doi":"10.1007/s41999-024-01150-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>An emerging field of research involves caregiving outcomes for persons with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) and co-occurring multimorbidity (ADRD-multimorbidity). This scoping review aims to assess and synthesize the body of literature on caregiving outcomes among informal caregivers of individuals with ADRD-multimorbidity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We adhered to the scoping review framework by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and Levac and colleagues (2010), which encompassed five steps: (1) identify the research question(s), delineate the inclusion and exclusion criteria, (2) search for relevant studies, (3) select studies, (4) chart the data, and (5) collate, summarize, and report results. Electronic databases including Ovid Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO were employed to identify relevant studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,856 articles were identified and 29 were included in the final review. The majority of studies were quantitative, cross-sectional studies. The two most commonly examined caregiving outcomes were caregiver burden and psychological well-being. Most research on caregiver outcomes treated care recipients' cognitive impairment and chronic conditions separately, rather than exploring their interaction. Most studies examining caregiver burden utilized Zarit Burden Index and its variants. Specific psychological well-being outcomes displayed great variability across studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite challenges in synthesizing the extensive variability in the way cognitive status, ADRD-multimorbidity, and caregiving outcomes were measured, included, and reported, this review underscores the intricate challenges of caregiving, especially when dealing with both cognitive impairments and co-occurring chronic conditions. This complexity underscores the need for a deeper understanding of the diverse needs facing caregivers of people with ADRD-multimorbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":49287,"journal":{"name":"European Geriatric Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"485-524"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-024-01150-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: An emerging field of research involves caregiving outcomes for persons with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) and co-occurring multimorbidity (ADRD-multimorbidity). This scoping review aims to assess and synthesize the body of literature on caregiving outcomes among informal caregivers of individuals with ADRD-multimorbidity.

Methods: We adhered to the scoping review framework by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and Levac and colleagues (2010), which encompassed five steps: (1) identify the research question(s), delineate the inclusion and exclusion criteria, (2) search for relevant studies, (3) select studies, (4) chart the data, and (5) collate, summarize, and report results. Electronic databases including Ovid Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO were employed to identify relevant studies.

Results: A total of 1,856 articles were identified and 29 were included in the final review. The majority of studies were quantitative, cross-sectional studies. The two most commonly examined caregiving outcomes were caregiver burden and psychological well-being. Most research on caregiver outcomes treated care recipients' cognitive impairment and chronic conditions separately, rather than exploring their interaction. Most studies examining caregiver burden utilized Zarit Burden Index and its variants. Specific psychological well-being outcomes displayed great variability across studies.

Conclusion: Despite challenges in synthesizing the extensive variability in the way cognitive status, ADRD-multimorbidity, and caregiving outcomes were measured, included, and reported, this review underscores the intricate challenges of caregiving, especially when dealing with both cognitive impairments and co-occurring chronic conditions. This complexity underscores the need for a deeper understanding of the diverse needs facing caregivers of people with ADRD-multimorbidity.

多病和痴呆患者非正式照护者的照护结果:范围综述
目的:一个新兴的研究领域涉及阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆(ADRD)和并发多病(ADRD-多病)患者的护理结果。本综述旨在评估和综合有关adhd多重发病个体的非正式照护者的照护结果的文献。方法:我们遵循Arksey和O'Malley(2005)和Levac及其同事(2010)的范围审查框架,该框架包括五个步骤:(1)确定研究问题,描述纳入和排除标准,(2)搜索相关研究,(3)选择研究,(4)绘制数据图表,(5)整理、总结和报告结果。采用Ovid Medline、CINAHL、Embase、PsycINFO等电子数据库对相关研究进行检索。结果:共纳入文献1856篇,最终纳入文献29篇。大多数研究是定量的、横断面的研究。最常被检查的两个照护结果是照护者负担和心理健康。大多数关于照顾者结果的研究将被照顾者的认知障碍和慢性疾病分开处理,而不是探索它们之间的相互作用。大多数研究检查照顾者负担使用Zarit负担指数及其变体。具体的心理健康结果在不同的研究中表现出很大的差异。结论:尽管在认知状态、adrd多病和护理结果的测量、纳入和报告中存在广泛的变异性,但本综述强调了护理的复杂挑战,特别是在处理认知障碍和并发慢性疾病时。这种复杂性强调需要更深入地了解多动症多发病患者护理人员面临的不同需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Geriatric Medicine
European Geriatric Medicine GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Geriatric Medicine is the official journal of the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS). Launched in 2010, this journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of Geriatric Medicine. The EUGMS is interested in the promotion of Geriatric Medicine in any setting (acute or subacute care, rehabilitation, nursing homes, primary care, fall clinics, ambulatory assessment, dementia clinics..), and also in functionality in old age, comprehensive geriatric assessment, geriatric syndromes, geriatric education, old age psychiatry, models of geriatric care in health services, and quality assurance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信