Dental Arch Relationship Outcomes of 5-Year-Olds Born With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Following the Centralization of Cleft Services.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Batol K Alattar, Anthony J Ireland, Jonathan R Sandy, Peter V Fowler
{"title":"Dental Arch Relationship Outcomes of 5-Year-Olds Born With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Following the Centralization of Cleft Services.","authors":"Batol K Alattar, Anthony J Ireland, Jonathan R Sandy, Peter V Fowler","doi":"10.1177/10556656251322610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To investigate the interdental arch relationship outcomes of 5-year-old children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) before and after centralization of cleft services in the United Kingdom (UK) using the modified Huddart-Bodenham index (MHBI) and to investigate any differences in MHBI by cleft laterality.</p><p><p>Retrospective cross-sectional study.</p><p><p>Evaluation of three-dimensional study models of children with a complete UCLP.</p><p><p>All available 5-year-old orthodontic study models of participants with UCLP from the precentralization Clinical Standard Advisory Group (CSAG <i>n</i> = 107) and postcentralization cleft care UK (CCUK <i>n</i> = 195) studies. The models were also grouped by cleft laterality (left and right sided).</p><p><p>Differences between the interdental arch relationship outcomes were assessed using the MHBI. This index scored the buccal/palatal or labial/palatal relationships of 8 maxillary deciduous teeth with the opposing mandibular dentition. The anterior segment, buccal cleft segment, and noncleft segment scores were calculated and combined to calculate the MBHI total arch scores.</p><p><p>Inter and intraexaminer reliability demonstrated high levels of agreement. Statistically significant differences in the anterior segment, buccal noncleft segment, and total arch MHBI scores were found, with postcentralization CCUK performing better. Right-sided UCLP had statistically significantly better buccal cleft segments, but no differences were found for the other MBHI segments or total arch scores.</p><p><p>There were improved interdental arch relationships postcentralization of cleft services in the United Kingdom. Cleft laterality differences were limited to the buccal cleft segment with right-sided UCLP having better MBHI scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"10556656251322610"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656251322610","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate the interdental arch relationship outcomes of 5-year-old children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) before and after centralization of cleft services in the United Kingdom (UK) using the modified Huddart-Bodenham index (MHBI) and to investigate any differences in MHBI by cleft laterality.

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

Evaluation of three-dimensional study models of children with a complete UCLP.

All available 5-year-old orthodontic study models of participants with UCLP from the precentralization Clinical Standard Advisory Group (CSAG n = 107) and postcentralization cleft care UK (CCUK n = 195) studies. The models were also grouped by cleft laterality (left and right sided).

Differences between the interdental arch relationship outcomes were assessed using the MHBI. This index scored the buccal/palatal or labial/palatal relationships of 8 maxillary deciduous teeth with the opposing mandibular dentition. The anterior segment, buccal cleft segment, and noncleft segment scores were calculated and combined to calculate the MBHI total arch scores.

Inter and intraexaminer reliability demonstrated high levels of agreement. Statistically significant differences in the anterior segment, buccal noncleft segment, and total arch MHBI scores were found, with postcentralization CCUK performing better. Right-sided UCLP had statistically significantly better buccal cleft segments, but no differences were found for the other MBHI segments or total arch scores.

There were improved interdental arch relationships postcentralization of cleft services in the United Kingdom. Cleft laterality differences were limited to the buccal cleft segment with right-sided UCLP having better MBHI scores.

唇腭裂服务集中化后 5 岁单侧唇腭裂患儿的牙弓关系结果。
利用改良的Huddart-Bodenham指数(MHBI)调查英国5岁单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)患儿在唇裂集中治疗前后的牙间弓关系结果,并探讨唇裂偏侧性在MHBI方面的差异。回顾性横断面研究。完全性UCLP患儿三维学习模型的评价。所有来自集中前临床标准咨询小组(CSAG n = 107)和集中后英国唇裂护理(CCUK n = 195)研究的5岁UCLP参与者的正畸研究模型。模型按裂侧性(左、右)分组。使用MHBI评估牙间弓关系结果的差异。该指标对8颗与下颌牙列相对的上颌乳牙的颊/腭或唇/腭关系进行评分。计算前节段、颊裂节段和非裂节段评分,并将其合并计算MBHI总弓评分。审查员之间和审查员内部的信度表现出高度的一致性。前节段、颊部非裂节段和总弓MHBI评分差异有统计学意义,中心化后的CCUK表现更好。右侧UCLP的颊裂节段有统计学意义上的改善,但其他MBHI节段和总弓评分没有差异。在英国,唇腭裂集中治疗后,牙间弓关系得到了改善。裂侧性差异仅限于颊裂节段,右侧UCLP具有更好的MBHI评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信