Mingxia Ji, Linlin Zhu, Mengyan Chen, Yi Wang, Weiyong Qiu, Ning Zhang
{"title":"Predictive value of mNUTRIC score for chronic critical illness in patients of sepsis complicated with ARDS.","authors":"Mingxia Ji, Linlin Zhu, Mengyan Chen, Yi Wang, Weiyong Qiu, Ning Zhang","doi":"10.1177/09287329241296430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo explore the predictive value of the modified NUTrition Risk in the Critically ill (mNUTRIC) for patients with sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) developing into chronic critical illness (CCI).BackgroundSepsis is an important risk factor for Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and sepsis induced ARDS accounts for 32% of patients. Patients with this subtype of ARDS have a worse prognosis than those with sepsis alone or ARDS, usually facing higher mortality rates and lower success rates of extubation, and have received more attention in clinical practice.MethodsA retrospective observational study was conducted on 118 patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Yiwu Central Hospital from January 2020 to May 2022. Patients were categorized into two groups: CCI and rapid recovery (RAP), based on the occurrence of CCI. Age, gender, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, albumin, serum creatinine, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), mNUTRIC score, ICU length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) were compared between the two groups. The association between mNUTRIC and CCI in patients with sepsis complicated by ARDS was further examined using three models and multivariate logistic regression.The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was utilized to analyze the predictive values of mNUTRIC score, SOFA score, and APACHE II score for predicting the occurrence of CCI in patients with sepsis complicated by ARDS.ResultsThe age, mNUTRIC score, SOFA score, APACHE II score, ICU length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and CRRT ratio were significantly higher in the CCI group compared to the RAP group (all P < 0.05). Conversely, there were no statistically significant differences in white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, and albumin levels between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the mNUTRIC score as an independent risk factor for CCI in patients with sepsis complicated by ARDS. The constructed models showed that the mNUTRIC score remained significant, while the SOFA score and APACHE II score did not.The area under the ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the mNUTRIC score had the highest AUC of 0.880, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.808-0.933. The AUC for the SOFA score was 0.864, and for the APACHE II score was 0.825, all of which were statistically significant.ConclusionsThe mNUTRIC score is valuable in predicting the progression of sepsis combined with ARDS to CCI, and may even be superior to the SOFA score and APACHE II score.</p>","PeriodicalId":48978,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"831-837"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329241296430","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectiveTo explore the predictive value of the modified NUTrition Risk in the Critically ill (mNUTRIC) for patients with sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) developing into chronic critical illness (CCI).BackgroundSepsis is an important risk factor for Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and sepsis induced ARDS accounts for 32% of patients. Patients with this subtype of ARDS have a worse prognosis than those with sepsis alone or ARDS, usually facing higher mortality rates and lower success rates of extubation, and have received more attention in clinical practice.MethodsA retrospective observational study was conducted on 118 patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Yiwu Central Hospital from January 2020 to May 2022. Patients were categorized into two groups: CCI and rapid recovery (RAP), based on the occurrence of CCI. Age, gender, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, albumin, serum creatinine, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), mNUTRIC score, ICU length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) were compared between the two groups. The association between mNUTRIC and CCI in patients with sepsis complicated by ARDS was further examined using three models and multivariate logistic regression.The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was utilized to analyze the predictive values of mNUTRIC score, SOFA score, and APACHE II score for predicting the occurrence of CCI in patients with sepsis complicated by ARDS.ResultsThe age, mNUTRIC score, SOFA score, APACHE II score, ICU length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and CRRT ratio were significantly higher in the CCI group compared to the RAP group (all P < 0.05). Conversely, there were no statistically significant differences in white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, and albumin levels between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the mNUTRIC score as an independent risk factor for CCI in patients with sepsis complicated by ARDS. The constructed models showed that the mNUTRIC score remained significant, while the SOFA score and APACHE II score did not.The area under the ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the mNUTRIC score had the highest AUC of 0.880, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.808-0.933. The AUC for the SOFA score was 0.864, and for the APACHE II score was 0.825, all of which were statistically significant.ConclusionsThe mNUTRIC score is valuable in predicting the progression of sepsis combined with ARDS to CCI, and may even be superior to the SOFA score and APACHE II score.
期刊介绍:
Technology and Health Care is intended to serve as a forum for the presentation of original articles and technical notes, observing rigorous scientific standards. Furthermore, upon invitation, reviews, tutorials, discussion papers and minisymposia are featured. The main focus of THC is related to the overlapping areas of engineering and medicine. The following types of contributions are considered:
1.Original articles: New concepts, procedures and devices associated with the use of technology in medical research and clinical practice are presented to a readership with a widespread background in engineering and/or medicine. In particular, the clinical benefit deriving from the application of engineering methods and devices in clinical medicine should be demonstrated. Typically, full length original contributions have a length of 4000 words, thereby taking duly into account figures and tables.
2.Technical Notes and Short Communications: Technical Notes relate to novel technical developments with relevance for clinical medicine. In Short Communications, clinical applications are shortly described. 3.Both Technical Notes and Short Communications typically have a length of 1500 words.
Reviews and Tutorials (upon invitation only): Tutorial and educational articles for persons with a primarily medical background on principles of engineering with particular significance for biomedical applications and vice versa are presented. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of topics.
4.Minisymposia (upon invitation only): Under the leadership of a Special Editor, controversial or important issues relating to health care are highlighted and discussed by various authors.
5.Letters to the Editors: Discussions or short statements (not indexed).