Machine learning for improved medical device management: A focus on defibrillator performance.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Technology and Health Care Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1177/09287329241290944
Lemana Spahić, Luka Jeremić, Ivana Lalatović, Tatjana Muratović, Amra Džuho, Lejla Gurbeta Pokvić, Almir Badnjević
{"title":"Machine learning for improved medical device management: A focus on defibrillator performance.","authors":"Lemana Spahić, Luka Jeremić, Ivana Lalatović, Tatjana Muratović, Amra Džuho, Lejla Gurbeta Pokvić, Almir Badnjević","doi":"10.1177/09287329241290944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPoorly regulated and insufficiently maintained medical devices (MDs) carry high risk on safety and performance parameters impacting the clinical effectiveness and efficiency of patient diagnosis and treatment. After the MD directive (MDD) had been in force for 25 years, in 2017 the new MD Regulation (MDR) was introduced. One of the more stringent requirement is a need for better control of MD safety and performance post-market surveillance mechanisms.ObjectiveTo address this, we have developed an automated system for management of MDs, based on their safety and performance measurement parameters, that use machine learning algorithm as a core of its functioning.MethodsIn total, 1997 samples were collected during the inspection process of defibrillator inspections performed by an ISO 17020 accredited laboratory at various healthcare institutions in Bosnia and Herzegovina. This paper presents solution developed for defibrillators, but proposed system is scalable to any other type of MDs, both diagnostic and therapeutic.ResultsVarious machine learning algorithms were considered, including Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Naïve Bayes (NB) and Logistic Regression (LR). In addition, random forest regressor and XG Boost algorithms were tested for their predictive capabilities in the field of defibrillator output error prediction. These algorithms were selected because of their ability to handle large datasets and their potential for achieving high prediction accuracy. The highest accuracy achieved on this dataset was 94.8% using the Naive Bayes algorithm. The XGBoost Regressor with its r<sup>2</sup> of 0.99 emerged as a powerful tool, showcasing exceptional predictive accuracy and the ability to capture a substantial portion of the dataset's variability.ConclusionThe results of this study demonstrate that clinical engineering (CE) and health technology management (HTM) departments in healthcare institutions can benefit from proposed automatization of defibrillator maintenance scheduling in terms of increased safety and treatment of patients, on one side, and cost optimization in MD management departments, on the other side.</p>","PeriodicalId":48978,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"737-743"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329241290944","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundPoorly regulated and insufficiently maintained medical devices (MDs) carry high risk on safety and performance parameters impacting the clinical effectiveness and efficiency of patient diagnosis and treatment. After the MD directive (MDD) had been in force for 25 years, in 2017 the new MD Regulation (MDR) was introduced. One of the more stringent requirement is a need for better control of MD safety and performance post-market surveillance mechanisms.ObjectiveTo address this, we have developed an automated system for management of MDs, based on their safety and performance measurement parameters, that use machine learning algorithm as a core of its functioning.MethodsIn total, 1997 samples were collected during the inspection process of defibrillator inspections performed by an ISO 17020 accredited laboratory at various healthcare institutions in Bosnia and Herzegovina. This paper presents solution developed for defibrillators, but proposed system is scalable to any other type of MDs, both diagnostic and therapeutic.ResultsVarious machine learning algorithms were considered, including Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Naïve Bayes (NB) and Logistic Regression (LR). In addition, random forest regressor and XG Boost algorithms were tested for their predictive capabilities in the field of defibrillator output error prediction. These algorithms were selected because of their ability to handle large datasets and their potential for achieving high prediction accuracy. The highest accuracy achieved on this dataset was 94.8% using the Naive Bayes algorithm. The XGBoost Regressor with its r2 of 0.99 emerged as a powerful tool, showcasing exceptional predictive accuracy and the ability to capture a substantial portion of the dataset's variability.ConclusionThe results of this study demonstrate that clinical engineering (CE) and health technology management (HTM) departments in healthcare institutions can benefit from proposed automatization of defibrillator maintenance scheduling in terms of increased safety and treatment of patients, on one side, and cost optimization in MD management departments, on the other side.

用于改进医疗设备管理的机器学习:关注除颤器性能。
背景:监管不力和维护不足的医疗器械(MDs)在安全性和性能参数方面存在高风险,影响患者诊断和治疗的临床有效性和效率。在MD指令(MDD)生效25年后,2017年引入了新的MD法规(MDR)。更严格的要求之一是需要更好地控制药物的安全性和上市后的监测机制。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了一个自动化的md管理系统,基于他们的安全和性能测量参数,使用机器学习算法作为其功能的核心。方法:在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那各医疗机构的ISO 17020认证实验室进行除颤器检查过程中,共收集了1997个样本。本文提出了为除颤器开发的解决方案,但提出的系统可扩展到任何其他类型的MDs,包括诊断和治疗。结果:考虑了各种机器学习算法,包括决策树(DT)、随机森林(RF)、Naïve贝叶斯(NB)和逻辑回归(LR)。此外,随机森林回归和XG Boost算法在除颤器输出误差预测领域的预测能力进行了测试。选择这些算法是因为它们处理大型数据集的能力和实现高预测精度的潜力。使用朴素贝叶斯算法在该数据集上实现的最高准确率为94.8%。r2为0.99的XGBoost回归器成为了一个强大的工具,展示了卓越的预测准确性和捕获数据集变异性的很大一部分的能力。结论:本研究结果表明,医疗机构的临床工程(CE)和卫生技术管理(HTM)部门可以从拟议的除颤器维护计划自动化中获益,一方面可以提高患者的安全性和治疗,另一方面可以优化MD管理部门的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Technology and Health Care
Technology and Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
282
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Health Care is intended to serve as a forum for the presentation of original articles and technical notes, observing rigorous scientific standards. Furthermore, upon invitation, reviews, tutorials, discussion papers and minisymposia are featured. The main focus of THC is related to the overlapping areas of engineering and medicine. The following types of contributions are considered: 1.Original articles: New concepts, procedures and devices associated with the use of technology in medical research and clinical practice are presented to a readership with a widespread background in engineering and/or medicine. In particular, the clinical benefit deriving from the application of engineering methods and devices in clinical medicine should be demonstrated. Typically, full length original contributions have a length of 4000 words, thereby taking duly into account figures and tables. 2.Technical Notes and Short Communications: Technical Notes relate to novel technical developments with relevance for clinical medicine. In Short Communications, clinical applications are shortly described. 3.Both Technical Notes and Short Communications typically have a length of 1500 words. Reviews and Tutorials (upon invitation only): Tutorial and educational articles for persons with a primarily medical background on principles of engineering with particular significance for biomedical applications and vice versa are presented. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of topics. 4.Minisymposia (upon invitation only): Under the leadership of a Special Editor, controversial or important issues relating to health care are highlighted and discussed by various authors. 5.Letters to the Editors: Discussions or short statements (not indexed).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信