The Feasibility and Reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD-3) for Children with Disabilities in Regional Australia: A Pragmatic Pilot Study.
Georgina L Clutterbuck, Caroline Ho, Genevieve M Dwyer
{"title":"The Feasibility and Reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD-3) for Children with Disabilities in Regional Australia: A Pragmatic Pilot Study.","authors":"Georgina L Clutterbuck, Caroline Ho, Genevieve M Dwyer","doi":"10.1080/01942638.2025.2463350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Evaluate feasibility and preliminary inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development, third edition (TGMD-3) for children with disabilities in regional Australia; comparing \"live\" and videorecorded scoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three physiotherapists (one familiar with TGMD administration, two unfamiliar) completed \"live\" administration and scoring. Five raters (three physiotherapists, two familiar and one unfamiliar, and two unfamiliar student physiotherapists) scored video-recordings at normal and slow speed. Semi-structured interviews explored raters' experiences using the TGMD-3 for children with disabilities in a regional context, and/or scoring via videorecording. Agreement within and among raters were reported using intraclass correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Raters agreed that TGMD-3 was feasible in terms of acceptability (mean 22.5 min scoring, slow-speed assisted accuracy), practicality (minimal resources), demand (addressed client goals), and implementation and integration into practice in regional Australia. Subscale and total scores showed good-to-excellent intra-rater (ICC = 0.73-0.99), and moderate-to-good inter-rater reliability for all but one student rater (ICC = 0.29-0.88). Filming recommendations were developed to enhance scoring.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TGMD-3 is feasible and has acceptable reliability when measuring high-level gross-motor performance for children with disabilities in regional Australia using live or video scoring. Modifications to criterion descriptors and more disability-targeted training, are recommended to optimize scoring consistency for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":49138,"journal":{"name":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2025.2463350","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: Evaluate feasibility and preliminary inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development, third edition (TGMD-3) for children with disabilities in regional Australia; comparing "live" and videorecorded scoring.
Methods: Three physiotherapists (one familiar with TGMD administration, two unfamiliar) completed "live" administration and scoring. Five raters (three physiotherapists, two familiar and one unfamiliar, and two unfamiliar student physiotherapists) scored video-recordings at normal and slow speed. Semi-structured interviews explored raters' experiences using the TGMD-3 for children with disabilities in a regional context, and/or scoring via videorecording. Agreement within and among raters were reported using intraclass correlation coefficients.
Results: Raters agreed that TGMD-3 was feasible in terms of acceptability (mean 22.5 min scoring, slow-speed assisted accuracy), practicality (minimal resources), demand (addressed client goals), and implementation and integration into practice in regional Australia. Subscale and total scores showed good-to-excellent intra-rater (ICC = 0.73-0.99), and moderate-to-good inter-rater reliability for all but one student rater (ICC = 0.29-0.88). Filming recommendations were developed to enhance scoring.
Conclusions: The TGMD-3 is feasible and has acceptable reliability when measuring high-level gross-motor performance for children with disabilities in regional Australia using live or video scoring. Modifications to criterion descriptors and more disability-targeted training, are recommended to optimize scoring consistency for this population.
期刊介绍：
5 issues per year
Abstracted and/or indexed in: AMED; British Library Inside; Child Development Abstracts; CINAHL; Contents Pages in Education; EBSCO; Education Research Abstracts (ERA); Education Resources Information Center (ERIC); EMCARE; Excerpta Medica/EMBASE; Family and Society Studies Worldwide; Family Index Database; Google Scholar; HaPI Database; HINARI; Index Copernicus; Intute; JournalSeek; MANTIS; MEDLINE; NewJour; OCLC; OTDBASE; OT SEARCH; Otseeker; PEDro; ProQuest; PsycINFO; PSYCLINE; PubsHub; PubMed; REHABDATA; SCOPUS; SIRC; Social Work Abstracts; Speical Educational Needs Abstracts; SwetsWise; Zetoc (British Library); Science Citation Index Expanded (also known as SciSearch®); Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition; Social Sciences Citation Index®; Journal Citation Reports/ Social Sciences Edition; Current Contents®/Social and Behavioral Sciences; Current Contents®/Clinical Medicine
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
