Treatment of recurrent shoulder dislocation by arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation using the long head of the Biceps tendon.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Jun Wang, Danlei Huang, Zhiyang Ye, Weizong Weng, Guangze Wang, Haoyuan Liu, Jianming Huang
{"title":"Treatment of recurrent shoulder dislocation by arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation using the long head of the Biceps tendon.","authors":"Jun Wang, Danlei Huang, Zhiyang Ye, Weizong Weng, Guangze Wang, Haoyuan Liu, Jianming Huang","doi":"10.1177/09287329241302741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation is a common shoulder problem, usually caused by a force from the front when the shoulder joint is abducted and externally rotated. In the present study, we investigated the effect of arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation using the long head of the biceps tendon on shoulder motion after restoring anterior stability of the joint in patients with 13.5-20% of scapular glenoid defects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty patients admitted to our department with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation between April 2017 and July 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups (groups A and B, n = 25 each) with comparable age, sex, hand dominance, and articular glenoid bone loss. Patients in group A were treated with arthroscopic Bankart repair and subscapularis augmentation, whereas those in group B underwent arthroscopic long head of the biceps transposition and subscapularis augmentation. All patients in both groups were followed up for more than 1 year, with a mean follow-up period of 20.1 ± 0.7 months (range, 13-28 months). The primary outcomes were changes in the visual analog scale score, Rowe classification, and Constant-Murley shoulder outcome score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>None of the patients in either group had experienced recurrent dislocation at 1-year follow-up. The visual analog scale scores decreased, and the Rowe and Constant-Murley scores improved significantly compared to the preoperative scores. Significant differences were observed in the forward flexion, abduction, and internal rotation angles of the shoulder joint in both groups at 1-year follow-up compared to baseline. The postoperative forward flexion (<i>P </i>= 0.143), abduction (<i>P </i>= 0.778), and internal rotation angles (<i>P </i>= 0.609) did not differ significantly between the two groups. At 1-year follow-up, the loss of angles of external rotation at the side and external rotation at 90° abduction in group B exhibited significantly less angular loss than group A.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation using the long head of the biceps transposition technique was effective at restoring anterior stability in patients with 13.5-20% scapular glenoid defects. It was more effective at restoring the external rotational function of the shoulder joint than arthroscopic Bankart repair and subscapularis augmentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48978,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"9287329241302741"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329241302741","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation is a common shoulder problem, usually caused by a force from the front when the shoulder joint is abducted and externally rotated. In the present study, we investigated the effect of arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation using the long head of the biceps tendon on shoulder motion after restoring anterior stability of the joint in patients with 13.5-20% of scapular glenoid defects.

Methods: Fifty patients admitted to our department with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation between April 2017 and July 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups (groups A and B, n = 25 each) with comparable age, sex, hand dominance, and articular glenoid bone loss. Patients in group A were treated with arthroscopic Bankart repair and subscapularis augmentation, whereas those in group B underwent arthroscopic long head of the biceps transposition and subscapularis augmentation. All patients in both groups were followed up for more than 1 year, with a mean follow-up period of 20.1 ± 0.7 months (range, 13-28 months). The primary outcomes were changes in the visual analog scale score, Rowe classification, and Constant-Murley shoulder outcome score.

Results: None of the patients in either group had experienced recurrent dislocation at 1-year follow-up. The visual analog scale scores decreased, and the Rowe and Constant-Murley scores improved significantly compared to the preoperative scores. Significant differences were observed in the forward flexion, abduction, and internal rotation angles of the shoulder joint in both groups at 1-year follow-up compared to baseline. The postoperative forward flexion (P = 0.143), abduction (P = 0.778), and internal rotation angles (P = 0.609) did not differ significantly between the two groups. At 1-year follow-up, the loss of angles of external rotation at the side and external rotation at 90° abduction in group B exhibited significantly less angular loss than group A.

Conclusion: Arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation using the long head of the biceps transposition technique was effective at restoring anterior stability in patients with 13.5-20% scapular glenoid defects. It was more effective at restoring the external rotational function of the shoulder joint than arthroscopic Bankart repair and subscapularis augmentation.

关节镜下肱二头肌肌腱长头增强肩胛下肌治疗复发性肩关节脱位。
背景:复发性肩关节前脱位是一种常见的肩关节问题,通常是由肩关节外展和外旋时来自前方的力引起的。在本研究中,我们研究了在13.5-20%肩胛盂关节缺损患者恢复关节前稳定性后,使用肱二头肌肌腱长头增强肩胛下肌对肩部运动的影响。方法:回顾性分析2017年4月至2021年7月间我科收治的50例复发性肩前脱位患者。患者被分为两组(A组和B组,各25例),年龄、性别、手部优势和关节盂骨丢失相似。A组患者行关节镜下Bankart修复和肩胛下肌提升术,B组患者行关节镜下肱二头长头移位和肩胛下肌提升术。两组患者均随访1年以上,平均随访时间20.1±0.7个月(范围13 ~ 28个月)。主要结果是视觉模拟量表评分、Rowe分类和Constant-Murley肩部结果评分的变化。结果:随访1年,两组患者均未发生复发性脱位。视觉模拟量表评分下降,Rowe和Constant-Murley评分与术前评分相比显著提高。在1年的随访中,两组患者肩关节的前屈、外展和内旋角度与基线相比有显著差异。两组术后前屈(P = 0.143)、外展(P = 0.778)、内旋角度(P = 0.609)差异无统计学意义。在1年的随访中,B组侧位外旋和外展90°外旋的角度损失明显小于a组。结论:关节镜下肩胛下肌增强术使用二头肌长头转位技术可有效恢复13.5-20%肩胛盂关节缺损患者的前路稳定性。在恢复肩关节外旋功能方面,它比关节镜下Bankart修复和肩胛下肌增强术更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Technology and Health Care
Technology and Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
282
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Health Care is intended to serve as a forum for the presentation of original articles and technical notes, observing rigorous scientific standards. Furthermore, upon invitation, reviews, tutorials, discussion papers and minisymposia are featured. The main focus of THC is related to the overlapping areas of engineering and medicine. The following types of contributions are considered: 1.Original articles: New concepts, procedures and devices associated with the use of technology in medical research and clinical practice are presented to a readership with a widespread background in engineering and/or medicine. In particular, the clinical benefit deriving from the application of engineering methods and devices in clinical medicine should be demonstrated. Typically, full length original contributions have a length of 4000 words, thereby taking duly into account figures and tables. 2.Technical Notes and Short Communications: Technical Notes relate to novel technical developments with relevance for clinical medicine. In Short Communications, clinical applications are shortly described. 3.Both Technical Notes and Short Communications typically have a length of 1500 words. Reviews and Tutorials (upon invitation only): Tutorial and educational articles for persons with a primarily medical background on principles of engineering with particular significance for biomedical applications and vice versa are presented. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of topics. 4.Minisymposia (upon invitation only): Under the leadership of a Special Editor, controversial or important issues relating to health care are highlighted and discussed by various authors. 5.Letters to the Editors: Discussions or short statements (not indexed).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信