Diabetic foot ulcer classification assessment employing an improved machine learning algorithm.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Raj Kumar Gudivaka, Rajya Lakshmi Gudivaka, Basava Ramanjaneyulu Gudivaka, Dinesh Kumar Reddy Basani, Sri Harsha Grandhi, Faheem Khan
{"title":"Diabetic foot ulcer classification assessment employing an improved machine learning algorithm.","authors":"Raj Kumar Gudivaka, Rajya Lakshmi Gudivaka, Basava Ramanjaneyulu Gudivaka, Dinesh Kumar Reddy Basani, Sri Harsha Grandhi, Faheem Khan","doi":"10.1177/09287329241296417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are a severe consequence of diabetes that, if left untreated, can lead to amputation, blindness, renal failure, and other serious complications. The high treatment expense and length of treatment for this therapeutic technique are both disadvantages. Despite the effectiveness of this strategy, a distant, cost-effective, and comfortable DFU diagnostic therapy is necessary.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study proposed the Advanced Machine Learning Practical Method for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Classification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This unique and cost-effective healthcare solution uses Practical Methodologies with the reinforcement learning algorithm for DFU imaging. The categorization was based on constant technological advancements, and the benefits of Machine Learning (ML) for use in DFU treatment are numerous, including enhanced clinical decision-making based on Ulcer classification and healing progress. The ML greatly impacted DFU data analysis, with categorization and risk assessment among the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The machine-learning technique can potentially create a paradigm shift by providing a 92.5% classification accuracy evaluation in the diabetic foot Ulcer problem. According to Clustering Scenario Analysis of Diabetic Foot Ulcer, when compared to Mild To Moderate Localized Cellulitis (Cluster 1 produces classification efficiency from 71% to 88%), Moderate To Severe Cellulitis (Cluster 2 delivers classification efficiency from 85% to 97%), Moderate To Severe Cellulitis With Ischemia (Cluster 3 produces classification efficiency from 90% to 98%), and Life-Or Limb-Threatening Infection (Cluster 4), the results were promising (Cluster 4 makes classification efficiency from 93.5% to 98.2%). The efficiency of this is Cluster 78.45 percent higher than the existing procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed Advanced Machine Learning Practical Method demonstrates significant improvements in DFU classification accuracy and efficiency, presenting a cost-effective and effective alternative to traditional diagnostic approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":48978,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"9287329241296417"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329241296417","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are a severe consequence of diabetes that, if left untreated, can lead to amputation, blindness, renal failure, and other serious complications. The high treatment expense and length of treatment for this therapeutic technique are both disadvantages. Despite the effectiveness of this strategy, a distant, cost-effective, and comfortable DFU diagnostic therapy is necessary.

Objective: This study proposed the Advanced Machine Learning Practical Method for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Classification.

Methods: This unique and cost-effective healthcare solution uses Practical Methodologies with the reinforcement learning algorithm for DFU imaging. The categorization was based on constant technological advancements, and the benefits of Machine Learning (ML) for use in DFU treatment are numerous, including enhanced clinical decision-making based on Ulcer classification and healing progress. The ML greatly impacted DFU data analysis, with categorization and risk assessment among the findings.

Results: The machine-learning technique can potentially create a paradigm shift by providing a 92.5% classification accuracy evaluation in the diabetic foot Ulcer problem. According to Clustering Scenario Analysis of Diabetic Foot Ulcer, when compared to Mild To Moderate Localized Cellulitis (Cluster 1 produces classification efficiency from 71% to 88%), Moderate To Severe Cellulitis (Cluster 2 delivers classification efficiency from 85% to 97%), Moderate To Severe Cellulitis With Ischemia (Cluster 3 produces classification efficiency from 90% to 98%), and Life-Or Limb-Threatening Infection (Cluster 4), the results were promising (Cluster 4 makes classification efficiency from 93.5% to 98.2%). The efficiency of this is Cluster 78.45 percent higher than the existing procedure.

Conclusions: The proposed Advanced Machine Learning Practical Method demonstrates significant improvements in DFU classification accuracy and efficiency, presenting a cost-effective and effective alternative to traditional diagnostic approaches.

采用改进机器学习算法的糖尿病足溃疡分类评估。
背景:糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)是糖尿病的严重后果,如果不及时治疗,可导致截肢、失明、肾衰竭和其他严重并发症。这种治疗方法的缺点是治疗费用高,治疗时间长。尽管该策略有效,但远程、经济、舒适的DFU诊断治疗是必要的。目的:提出一种用于糖尿病足溃疡分类的先进机器学习实用方法。方法:这种独特的和具有成本效益的医疗解决方案使用实用的方法与强化学习算法的DFU成像。分类是基于不断的技术进步,机器学习(ML)用于DFU治疗的好处很多,包括基于溃疡分类和愈合进展的增强临床决策。ML极大地影响了DFU数据分析,并在研究结果中进行了分类和风险评估。结果:机器学习技术可以通过在糖尿病足溃疡问题中提供92.5%的分类准确性评估来潜在地创造范式转变。根据糖尿病足溃疡的聚类情景分析,与轻度至中度局限性蜂窝织炎(聚类1的分类效率为71%至88%)、中度至重度蜂窝织炎(聚类2的分类效率为85%至97%)、中度至重度蜂窝织炎伴缺血(聚类3的分类效率为90%至98%)和危及生命或肢体的感染(聚类4)相比,聚类4的分类效率为93.5% ~ 98.2%。该方法的效率比现有程序高出78.45%。结论:提出的先进机器学习实用方法在DFU分类精度和效率方面有显著提高,是传统诊断方法的一种经济有效的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Technology and Health Care
Technology and Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
282
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Health Care is intended to serve as a forum for the presentation of original articles and technical notes, observing rigorous scientific standards. Furthermore, upon invitation, reviews, tutorials, discussion papers and minisymposia are featured. The main focus of THC is related to the overlapping areas of engineering and medicine. The following types of contributions are considered: 1.Original articles: New concepts, procedures and devices associated with the use of technology in medical research and clinical practice are presented to a readership with a widespread background in engineering and/or medicine. In particular, the clinical benefit deriving from the application of engineering methods and devices in clinical medicine should be demonstrated. Typically, full length original contributions have a length of 4000 words, thereby taking duly into account figures and tables. 2.Technical Notes and Short Communications: Technical Notes relate to novel technical developments with relevance for clinical medicine. In Short Communications, clinical applications are shortly described. 3.Both Technical Notes and Short Communications typically have a length of 1500 words. Reviews and Tutorials (upon invitation only): Tutorial and educational articles for persons with a primarily medical background on principles of engineering with particular significance for biomedical applications and vice versa are presented. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of topics. 4.Minisymposia (upon invitation only): Under the leadership of a Special Editor, controversial or important issues relating to health care are highlighted and discussed by various authors. 5.Letters to the Editors: Discussions or short statements (not indexed).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信