Barriers and Facilitators to Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Health Fair Attendees in Utah.

IF 3 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Jordan E Johnson, Svenja Pauleck, Andrea J H Williamson, Maranda Pahlkotter, Federica S Brecha, Nathaniel Ferre, Nancy Ortiz, Robin L Marcus, Sheetal Hardikar, Jessica N Cohan
{"title":"Barriers and Facilitators to Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Health Fair Attendees in Utah.","authors":"Jordan E Johnson, Svenja Pauleck, Andrea J H Williamson, Maranda Pahlkotter, Federica S Brecha, Nathaniel Ferre, Nancy Ortiz, Robin L Marcus, Sheetal Hardikar, Jessica N Cohan","doi":"10.1177/21501319251316659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake remains suboptimal despite the importance and effectiveness of various testing options. The purpose of our study was to identify barriers and facilitators to CRC screening in a community-based sample in Salt Lake County, Utah to inform future efforts to develop effective interventions to increase CRC screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled adults eligible for CRC screening at 6 community health events. Participants completed targeted questionnaires based on whether they had discussed screening with a provider and whether they had received screening. We identified participant-reported barriers to CRC screening using descriptive analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify participant characteristics associated with receipt of screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 117 participants who completed the questionnaires, 43.6% were 50 to 60 years old, 36.8% identified as white, and 51.3% identified as non-Hispanic. The most common barrier to colonoscopy was the need for extensive bowel preparation (30.8%). For stool tests, common barriers included handling stool (20.5%) and not understanding how to do the test (20.5%). For virtual colonoscopy, barriers included the need for extensive bowel preparation (21.4%) and cost (21.4%). Most participants (67.5%) believed that they should know about all CRC screening options available, and their importance. The majority of participants (68.4%) preferred to learn about CRC screening from their doctor or healthcare provider. Younger age was associated with non-screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed that study participants faced procedural barriers to complete CRC screening and preferred to learn about CRC screening options through their providers. Younger age groups were less likely to receive screening within our study sample. Future, targeted interventions to increase CRC screening should focus on increasing the awareness of the importance of CRC screening and educating patients on the various screening options available and their benefits, especially as they pertain to less invasive tests and targeting younger individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":46723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","volume":"16 ","pages":"21501319251316659"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843725/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319251316659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake remains suboptimal despite the importance and effectiveness of various testing options. The purpose of our study was to identify barriers and facilitators to CRC screening in a community-based sample in Salt Lake County, Utah to inform future efforts to develop effective interventions to increase CRC screening.

Methods: This study enrolled adults eligible for CRC screening at 6 community health events. Participants completed targeted questionnaires based on whether they had discussed screening with a provider and whether they had received screening. We identified participant-reported barriers to CRC screening using descriptive analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify participant characteristics associated with receipt of screening.

Results: Of the 117 participants who completed the questionnaires, 43.6% were 50 to 60 years old, 36.8% identified as white, and 51.3% identified as non-Hispanic. The most common barrier to colonoscopy was the need for extensive bowel preparation (30.8%). For stool tests, common barriers included handling stool (20.5%) and not understanding how to do the test (20.5%). For virtual colonoscopy, barriers included the need for extensive bowel preparation (21.4%) and cost (21.4%). Most participants (67.5%) believed that they should know about all CRC screening options available, and their importance. The majority of participants (68.4%) preferred to learn about CRC screening from their doctor or healthcare provider. Younger age was associated with non-screening.

Conclusion: We observed that study participants faced procedural barriers to complete CRC screening and preferred to learn about CRC screening options through their providers. Younger age groups were less likely to receive screening within our study sample. Future, targeted interventions to increase CRC screening should focus on increasing the awareness of the importance of CRC screening and educating patients on the various screening options available and their benefits, especially as they pertain to less invasive tests and targeting younger individuals.

犹他州健康博览会参会者中结直肠癌筛查的障碍和促进因素
背景:尽管各种检测选择的重要性和有效性,结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的摄取仍然不是最佳的。本研究的目的是在犹他州盐湖城县以社区为基础的样本中确定结直肠癌筛查的障碍和促进因素,为未来开发有效的干预措施以增加结直肠癌筛查提供信息。方法:本研究招募了在6个社区健康活动中符合CRC筛查条件的成年人。参与者根据他们是否与提供者讨论过筛查以及他们是否接受过筛查完成了有针对性的问卷调查。我们使用描述性分析确定了参与者报告的CRC筛查障碍。单变量和多变量分析用于确定与接受筛查相关的参与者特征。结果:在117名完成问卷的参与者中,43.6%的人年龄在50至60岁之间,36.8%的人为白人,51.3%的人为非西班牙裔。结肠镜检查最常见的障碍是需要广泛的肠道准备(30.8%)。对于粪便检查,常见的障碍包括处理粪便(20.5%)和不了解如何进行测试(20.5%)。对于虚拟结肠镜检查,障碍包括需要广泛的肠道准备(21.4%)和费用(21.4%)。大多数参与者(67.5%)认为他们应该了解所有可用的CRC筛查方案及其重要性。大多数参与者(68.4%)倾向于从他们的医生或医疗保健提供者那里了解结直肠癌筛查。年龄越小,未进行筛查的患者越少。结论:我们观察到,研究参与者在完成结直肠癌筛查时面临程序障碍,他们更愿意通过其提供者了解结直肠癌筛查方案。在我们的研究样本中,年龄较小的群体接受筛查的可能性较小。未来,增加CRC筛查的有针对性的干预措施应侧重于提高对CRC筛查重要性的认识,并教育患者各种可用的筛查选择及其益处,特别是因为它们涉及侵入性较小的检查和针对年轻人的筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
183
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信