A scoping review of librarian involvement in competency-based medical education.

IF 5.1 4区 医学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
John W Cyrus, Laura Zeigen, Molly Knapp, Amy E Blevins, Brandon Patterson
{"title":"A scoping review of librarian involvement in competency-based medical education.","authors":"John W Cyrus, Laura Zeigen, Molly Knapp, Amy E Blevins, Brandon Patterson","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2025.1965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A scoping review was undertaken to understand the extent of literature on librarian involvement in competency-based medical education (CBME).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We followed Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. A search of peer-reviewed literature was conducted on December 31, 2022, in Medline, Embase, ERIC, CINAHL Complete, SCOPUS, LISS, LLIS, and LISTA. Studies were included if they described librarian involvement in the planning, delivery, or assessment of CBME in an LCME-accredited medical school and were published in English. Outcomes included characteristics of the inventions (duration, librarian role, content covered) and of the outcomes and measures (level on Kirkpatrick Model of Training Evaluation, direction of findings, measure used).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty studies were included of 11,051 screened: 46 empirical studies or program evaluations and four literature reviews. Studies were published in eight journals with two-thirds published after 2010. Duration of the intervention ranged from 30 minutes to a semester long. Librarians served as collaborators, leaders, curriculum designers, and evaluators. Studies primarily covered asking clinical questions and finding information and most often assessed reaction or learning outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A solid base of literature on librarian involvement in CBME exists; however, few studies measure user behavior or use validated outcomes measures. When librarians are communicating their value to stakeholders, having evidence for the contributions of librarians is essential. Existing publications may not capture the extent of work done in this area. Additional research is needed to quantify the impact of librarian involvement in competency-based medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":47690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","volume":"113 1","pages":"9-23"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11835034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2025.1965","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: A scoping review was undertaken to understand the extent of literature on librarian involvement in competency-based medical education (CBME).

Methods: We followed Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. A search of peer-reviewed literature was conducted on December 31, 2022, in Medline, Embase, ERIC, CINAHL Complete, SCOPUS, LISS, LLIS, and LISTA. Studies were included if they described librarian involvement in the planning, delivery, or assessment of CBME in an LCME-accredited medical school and were published in English. Outcomes included characteristics of the inventions (duration, librarian role, content covered) and of the outcomes and measures (level on Kirkpatrick Model of Training Evaluation, direction of findings, measure used).

Results: Fifty studies were included of 11,051 screened: 46 empirical studies or program evaluations and four literature reviews. Studies were published in eight journals with two-thirds published after 2010. Duration of the intervention ranged from 30 minutes to a semester long. Librarians served as collaborators, leaders, curriculum designers, and evaluators. Studies primarily covered asking clinical questions and finding information and most often assessed reaction or learning outcomes.

Conclusions: A solid base of literature on librarian involvement in CBME exists; however, few studies measure user behavior or use validated outcomes measures. When librarians are communicating their value to stakeholders, having evidence for the contributions of librarians is essential. Existing publications may not capture the extent of work done in this area. Additional research is needed to quantify the impact of librarian involvement in competency-based medical education.

Abstract Image

基于能力的医学教育中图书馆员参与的范围审查。
目的:本研究旨在了解图书馆员参与能力本位医学教育(CBME)的文献范围。方法:我们遵循Joanna Briggs研究所的方法和PRISMA-ScR报告指南。我们于2022年12月31日在Medline、Embase、ERIC、CINAHL Complete、SCOPUS、LISS、LLIS和LISTA中对同行评议文献进行了检索。如果研究描述图书管理员参与lcme认可的医学院CBME的计划、交付或评估,并以英文发表,则纳入研究。结果包括发明的特征(持续时间、图书馆员的角色、涵盖的内容)以及结果和测量的特征(柯克帕特里克培训评估模型的水平、发现的方向、使用的测量)。结果:共纳入研究50篇,共筛选11051篇,其中实证研究或项目评估46篇,文献综述4篇。研究发表在8个期刊上,其中三分之二是在2010年之后发表的。干预的持续时间从30分钟到一个学期不等。图书馆员扮演合作者、领导者、课程设计者和评估者的角色。研究主要包括询问临床问题和寻找信息,最常见的是评估反应或学习成果。结论:关于图书馆员参与CBME的文献基础较好;然而,很少有研究测量用户行为或使用有效的结果测量。当图书馆员向利益相关者传达他们的价值时,有证据证明图书馆员的贡献是必不可少的。现有出版物可能无法反映在这一领域所做的工作的程度。需要进一步的研究来量化图书馆员参与能力为基础的医学教育的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Medical Library Association
Journal of the Medical Library Association INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Medical Library Association (JMLA) is an international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly that aims to advance the practice and research knowledgebase of health sciences librarianship. The most current impact factor for the JMLA (from the 2007 edition of Journal Citation Reports) is 1.392.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信