Impact of a USMLE Step 2 Prediction Model on Medical Student Motivations.

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Anthony Shanks, Ben Steckler, Sarah Smith, Debra Rusk, Emily Walvoord, Erin Dafoe, Paul Wallach
{"title":"Impact of a USMLE Step 2 Prediction Model on Medical Student Motivations.","authors":"Anthony Shanks, Ben Steckler, Sarah Smith, Debra Rusk, Emily Walvoord, Erin Dafoe, Paul Wallach","doi":"10.1177/23821205251321812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>With the transition of USMLE Step 1 to Pass/Fail, Step 2 CK carries added weight in the residency selection process. Our goal was to develop a Step 2 predicted score to provide to students earlier in medical school to assist with career mentoring. We also sought to understand how the predicted scores affected student's plans.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Traditional statistical models and machine learning algorithms to identify predictors of Step 2 CK performance were utilized. Predicted scores were provided to all students in the Class of 2024 at a large allopathic medical school. A cross-sectional survey was conducted to assess if the estimated score influenced career or study plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The independent variables that resulted in the most predictive model included CBSE score, Organ System course exam scores and Phase 2 (Third Year Clinical Clerkships) NBME percentile scores (Step2CK = 191.984 + 0.42 (CBSE score) + 0.294 (Organ Systems) + 0.409 (Average NBME). The standard error of the prediction model was 7.6 with better accuracy for predicted scores greater than 230 (SE 8.1) as compared to less than 230 (SE 12.8). Nineteen percent of respondents changed their study plan based on the predicted score result. Themes identified from the predicted score included reassurance for career planning and the creation of anxiety and stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A Step 2 Predicted Score, created from pre-existing metrics, was a good estimator of Step 2 CK performance. Given the timing of Step 2 CK, a predicted score would be a useful tool to counsel students during the specialty and residency selection process.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"12 ","pages":"23821205251321812"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251321812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: With the transition of USMLE Step 1 to Pass/Fail, Step 2 CK carries added weight in the residency selection process. Our goal was to develop a Step 2 predicted score to provide to students earlier in medical school to assist with career mentoring. We also sought to understand how the predicted scores affected student's plans.

Method: Traditional statistical models and machine learning algorithms to identify predictors of Step 2 CK performance were utilized. Predicted scores were provided to all students in the Class of 2024 at a large allopathic medical school. A cross-sectional survey was conducted to assess if the estimated score influenced career or study plans.

Results: The independent variables that resulted in the most predictive model included CBSE score, Organ System course exam scores and Phase 2 (Third Year Clinical Clerkships) NBME percentile scores (Step2CK = 191.984 + 0.42 (CBSE score) + 0.294 (Organ Systems) + 0.409 (Average NBME). The standard error of the prediction model was 7.6 with better accuracy for predicted scores greater than 230 (SE 8.1) as compared to less than 230 (SE 12.8). Nineteen percent of respondents changed their study plan based on the predicted score result. Themes identified from the predicted score included reassurance for career planning and the creation of anxiety and stress.

Conclusion: A Step 2 Predicted Score, created from pre-existing metrics, was a good estimator of Step 2 CK performance. Given the timing of Step 2 CK, a predicted score would be a useful tool to counsel students during the specialty and residency selection process.

USMLE第二步预测模型对医学生动机的影响
目的:随着USMLE步骤1向通过/失败过渡,步骤2 CK在住院医师选择过程中具有更大的权重。我们的目标是开发一个第二步预测分数,提供给医学院早期的学生,以帮助他们进行职业指导。我们还试图了解预测分数如何影响学生的计划。方法:利用传统的统计模型和机器学习算法来识别步骤2 CK性能的预测因子。预测分数提供给了一所大型对抗疗法医学院2024届的所有学生。我们进行了一项横断面调查,以评估估计分数是否会影响职业或学习计划。结果:导致最具预测性模型的自变量包括CBSE评分、器官系统课程考试分数和2期(临床实习3年)NBME百分位数分数(Step2CK = 191.984 + 0.42 (CBSE评分)+ 0.294(器官系统)+ 0.409(平均NBME))。预测模型的标准误差为7.6,预测分数大于230 (SE 8.1)比小于230 (SE 12.8)的准确率更高。19%的回答者根据预测的成绩改变了学习计划。从预测分数中确定的主题包括对职业规划的保证以及焦虑和压力的产生。结论:从预先存在的指标创建的第2步预测分数是第2步CK性能的良好估计。考虑到第二步CK的时间,预测分数将是在专业和住院医师选择过程中为学生提供咨询的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信