[Pelvic floor reconstruction with gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap in the treatment of perineal wound healing failure after pelvic exenteration].

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the value of pelvic floor reconstruction with gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap in second-stage surgery for patients with failed perineal wound healing after pelvic exenteration (PE). Methods: This was a descriptive case series study. The clinical data of 24 patients with locally advanced (LARC) or recurrent (LRRC) rectal cancer who underwent PE and had long-term nonunion of postoperative perineal wounds were collected from the department of colorectal surgery of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Navy Medical University (Shanghai Changzheng Hospital) from January 2022 to January 2023. The specific operation methods of pelvic reconstruction by gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap are as follows: the necrotic tissue of the perineal wound was debrided and rinsed repeatedly, the gluteus maximus muscle was cut and separated from the gluteus superior and inferior arteries, the middle muscle pedicle was retained, part of the skin and muscle were separated from the medial margin, part of the epidermis was removed, the muscle and subcutaneous tissue at the medial margin of the flap were fixed to the medial edge of the wound, negative pressure suction tubes were placed above and below the wound cavity and in the muscle space on the right side, and the subcutaneous muscle and fat layer were sutured. The skin was sutured intersegmentally, and a negative pressure suction device was placed on the wound surface. After surgery, the patient should remain prone, and the drainage tube should be placed for at least 7 days. The drainage tube can be removed after 24-hour drainage is less than 30 ml. Perineal wound healing and complications related to gluteal major myocutaneous flap were observed. Result: The median reconstruction time of 24 patients was 180 (150 ~ 230) minutes, and the median intraoperative blood loss was 100 (30 ~ 200) ml. 91.7% (22/24) patients had successful healing of perineal wound within 30 d after operation. After a follow-up of 6 months, no complete or partial flap necrosis occurred. The incidence of complications related to gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap was 8.3% (2/24). One patient had flap infection and sinus tract, and one patient had flap sinus tract. All patients healed after debridement under local anesthesia. Conclusion: For LARC/LRRC patients with poor perineal wound healing after PE, pelvic floor reconstruction with gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap in second-stage operation is safe and feasible, and could successfully close the perineal wound, and has a low incidence of postoperative flap-related complications.