Depression levels of the general public increases during the COVID-19 pandemic in China: A web-based cross-sectional survey.

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Qin-Ming Qiu, Yu Xiao
{"title":"Depression levels of the general public increases during the COVID-19 pandemic in China: A web-based cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Qin-Ming Qiu, Yu Xiao","doi":"10.5498/wjp.v15.i2.97971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak lasted several months, having started in December 2019. This study aimed to report the impacts of various factors on the depression levels of the general public and ascertain how emotional measures could be affected by psychosocial factors during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the depression levels of the general public in China during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2001 self-reported questionnaires about Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were collected on August 22, 2022 <i>via</i> the website. Each questionnaire included four levels of depression and other demographic information. The BDI scores and incidences of different depression levels were compared between various groups of respondents. <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> analysis and the two-tailed <i>t</i>-test were used to assess categorical and continuous data, respectively. Multiple linear regressions and logistic regressions were employed for correlation analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The averaged BDI score in this study was higher than that for the non-epidemic periods, as reported in previous studies. Even higher BDI scores and incidences of moderate and severe depression were recorded for people who were quarantined for suspected COVID-19 infection, compared to the respondents who were not quarantined. The participants who did not take protective measures were associated with higher BDI scores than those who made efforts to keep themselves relatively safer. Similarly, the people who did not return to work had higher BDI scores compared to those managed to. A significant association existed between the depression levels of the subgroups and each of the factors, except gender and location of residence. However, quarantine was the most relative predictor for depression levels, followed by failure to take preventive measures and losing a partner, either through divorce or death.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on these data, psychological interventions for the various subpopulations in the general public can be implemented during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Other countries can also use the data as a reference.</p>","PeriodicalId":23896,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"15 2","pages":"97971"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758042/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i2.97971","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak lasted several months, having started in December 2019. This study aimed to report the impacts of various factors on the depression levels of the general public and ascertain how emotional measures could be affected by psychosocial factors during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Aim: To investigate the depression levels of the general public in China during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: A total of 2001 self-reported questionnaires about Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were collected on August 22, 2022 via the website. Each questionnaire included four levels of depression and other demographic information. The BDI scores and incidences of different depression levels were compared between various groups of respondents. χ 2 analysis and the two-tailed t-test were used to assess categorical and continuous data, respectively. Multiple linear regressions and logistic regressions were employed for correlation analysis.

Results: The averaged BDI score in this study was higher than that for the non-epidemic periods, as reported in previous studies. Even higher BDI scores and incidences of moderate and severe depression were recorded for people who were quarantined for suspected COVID-19 infection, compared to the respondents who were not quarantined. The participants who did not take protective measures were associated with higher BDI scores than those who made efforts to keep themselves relatively safer. Similarly, the people who did not return to work had higher BDI scores compared to those managed to. A significant association existed between the depression levels of the subgroups and each of the factors, except gender and location of residence. However, quarantine was the most relative predictor for depression levels, followed by failure to take preventive measures and losing a partner, either through divorce or death.

Conclusion: Based on these data, psychological interventions for the various subpopulations in the general public can be implemented during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Other countries can also use the data as a reference.

新冠肺炎大流行期间中国公众抑郁水平上升:一项基于网络的横断面调查
背景:2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情始于2019年12月,持续了几个月。本研究旨在报告各种因素对公众抑郁水平的影响,并确定在COVID-19大流行期间,心理社会因素如何影响情绪测量。目的:了解新冠肺炎大流行期间中国公众的抑郁水平。方法:于2022年8月22日通过网站收集2001份贝克抑郁量表(BDI)自述问卷。每份调查问卷包括四个抑郁水平和其他人口统计信息。比较各组被调查者的BDI得分和不同抑郁程度的发生率。分别采用χ 2分析和双尾t检验对分类资料和连续资料进行评估。相关分析采用多元线性回归和logistic回归。结果:与以往的研究报告一样,本研究的平均BDI评分高于非流行时期。与未被隔离的受访者相比,因疑似COVID-19感染而被隔离的受访者的BDI评分和中度和重度抑郁症的发生率更高。没有采取保护措施的参与者比那些努力使自己相对安全的参与者BDI得分更高。同样,没有重返工作岗位的人比那些成功重返工作岗位的人BDI得分更高。除性别和居住地外,亚组的抑郁水平与每个因素之间存在显著关联。然而,隔离是抑郁程度最相关的预测指标,其次是未能采取预防措施和失去伴侣(无论是离婚还是死亡)。结论:基于这些数据,可以在COVID-19大流行期间和之后对公众中不同亚群实施心理干预。其他国家也可以将这些数据作为参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
6.50%
发文量
110
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Psychiatry (WJP) is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJP is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of psychiatry. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJP is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJP are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信