Xue-Mei Qin, Meng-Qi Xu, Ya-Qi Qin, Fang-Zhou Shao, Mo-Han Ma, Wen-Wen Ou, Guan-Yi Lv, Qian-Qian Zhang, Wen-Tao Chen, Xiao-Tian Zhao, Ao-Qian Deng, Jin-Tao Xiong, Ling-Si Zeng, Yi-Lin Peng, Mei Huang, Shu-Yin Xu, Mei Liao, Li Zhang, Ling-Jiang Li, Yu-Meng Ju, Jin Liu, Bang-Shan Liu, Yan Zhang
{"title":"Cumulative effects of stress-sensitivity factors on depressive symptoms and suicide risk: A prospective study.","authors":"Xue-Mei Qin, Meng-Qi Xu, Ya-Qi Qin, Fang-Zhou Shao, Mo-Han Ma, Wen-Wen Ou, Guan-Yi Lv, Qian-Qian Zhang, Wen-Tao Chen, Xiao-Tian Zhao, Ao-Qian Deng, Jin-Tao Xiong, Ling-Si Zeng, Yi-Lin Peng, Mei Huang, Shu-Yin Xu, Mei Liao, Li Zhang, Ling-Jiang Li, Yu-Meng Ju, Jin Liu, Bang-Shan Liu, Yan Zhang","doi":"10.5498/wjp.v15.i2.99996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sensitivity to stress is essential in the onset, clinical symptoms, course, and prognosis of major depressive disorder (MDD). Meanwhile, it was unclear how variously classified but connected stress-sensitivity variables affect MDD. We hypothesize that high-level trait- and state-related stress-sensitivity factors may have different cumulative effects on the clinical symptoms and follow-up outcomes of MDD.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate how stress-sensitivity factors added up and affected MDD clinical symptoms and follow-up results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, 281 MDD patients were enrolled from a tertiary care setting. High-level stress-sensitivity factors were classified as trait anxiety, state anxiety, perceived stress, and neuroticism, with a total score in the top quartile of the research cohort. The cumulative effects of stress-sensitivity factors on cognitive dysfunction, disability and functional impairment, suicide risk, and depressive and anxiety symptoms were examined using an analysis of variance with linear trend analysis. Correlations were investigated further using multiple regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding high-level stress-sensitivity factors, 53.40% of patients had at least one at baseline, and 29.61% had two or more. Four high-level stress-sensitivity components had significant cumulative impacts on MDD symptoms at baseline (all <i>P</i> < 0.001). Perceived stress predicted the greatest effect sizes of state-related factors on depressive symptoms (partial <i>η</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.153; standardized <i>β</i> = 0.195; <i>P</i> < 0.05). The follow-up outcomes were significantly impacted only by the high-level trait-related components, mainly when it came to depressive symptoms and suicide risk, which were predicted by trait anxiety and neuroticism, respectively (partial <i>η</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.204 and 0.156; standardized <i>β</i> = 0.247 and 0.392; <i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To enhance outcomes of MDD and lower the suicide risk, screening for stress-sensitivity factors and considering multifaceted measures, mainly focusing on trait-related ones, should be addressed clinically.</p>","PeriodicalId":23896,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"15 2","pages":"99996"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758051/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i2.99996","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Sensitivity to stress is essential in the onset, clinical symptoms, course, and prognosis of major depressive disorder (MDD). Meanwhile, it was unclear how variously classified but connected stress-sensitivity variables affect MDD. We hypothesize that high-level trait- and state-related stress-sensitivity factors may have different cumulative effects on the clinical symptoms and follow-up outcomes of MDD.
Aim: To investigate how stress-sensitivity factors added up and affected MDD clinical symptoms and follow-up results.
Methods: In this prospective study, 281 MDD patients were enrolled from a tertiary care setting. High-level stress-sensitivity factors were classified as trait anxiety, state anxiety, perceived stress, and neuroticism, with a total score in the top quartile of the research cohort. The cumulative effects of stress-sensitivity factors on cognitive dysfunction, disability and functional impairment, suicide risk, and depressive and anxiety symptoms were examined using an analysis of variance with linear trend analysis. Correlations were investigated further using multiple regression analysis.
Results: Regarding high-level stress-sensitivity factors, 53.40% of patients had at least one at baseline, and 29.61% had two or more. Four high-level stress-sensitivity components had significant cumulative impacts on MDD symptoms at baseline (all P < 0.001). Perceived stress predicted the greatest effect sizes of state-related factors on depressive symptoms (partial η2 = 0.153; standardized β = 0.195; P < 0.05). The follow-up outcomes were significantly impacted only by the high-level trait-related components, mainly when it came to depressive symptoms and suicide risk, which were predicted by trait anxiety and neuroticism, respectively (partial η2 = 0.204 and 0.156; standardized β = 0.247 and 0.392; P < 0.05).
Conclusion: To enhance outcomes of MDD and lower the suicide risk, screening for stress-sensitivity factors and considering multifaceted measures, mainly focusing on trait-related ones, should be addressed clinically.
期刊介绍:
The World Journal of Psychiatry (WJP) is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJP is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of psychiatry. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJP is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJP are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in psychiatry.