Wagner Araújo de Negreiros, Romulo Rocha Regis, Ana Cristina de Mello Fiallos, José Eugênio Teixeira Rocha, Isaac Augusto Dantas Nogueira, Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva, Raniel Fernandes Peixoto
{"title":"Effect of mandibular exercises in the control of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders: a randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Wagner Araújo de Negreiros, Romulo Rocha Regis, Ana Cristina de Mello Fiallos, José Eugênio Teixeira Rocha, Isaac Augusto Dantas Nogueira, Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva, Raniel Fernandes Peixoto","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b5984433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of mandibular exercises (ME) in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) diagnosed by Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirty-two patients seeking clinical treatment for TMD were randomly assigned to groups based on the treatment modality: conservative therapy (CT), including occlusal splint therapy and counseling; and ME. Muscle and joint pain were assessed using a 4-point scale (0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain, and 3 = severe pain). The maximum unassisted mouth opening (MUMO) was measured in millimeters, both with and pain-free. Outcomes were evaluated at baseline (T0) and after a 3-months intervention period (T1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both treatments significantly reduced muscle and joint pain intensity at most assessed sites. The reduction in pain with ME compared to CT was statistically significant at the right lateral pole of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) (p = 0.048; rrb = 0.348). After three months, ME resulted in greater pain-free MUMO (T0 vs. T1; p = 0.004; rrb = 0.594), and the increase in MUMO was greater than that observed with CT (p < 0.001; rrb = 0.742).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ME and CT similarly reduced palpatory pain, with ME showing greater clinical impact at the right lateral pole. Both treatments led to significant improvements in the masseter and TMJ pole. ME also provided superior, clinically meaningful gains in pain-free MUMO, positioning it as a preferred option when enhancing jaw mobility is a primary goal in TMD management.</p>","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"0 0","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b5984433","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of mandibular exercises (ME) in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) diagnosed by Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD).
Material and methods: Thirty-two patients seeking clinical treatment for TMD were randomly assigned to groups based on the treatment modality: conservative therapy (CT), including occlusal splint therapy and counseling; and ME. Muscle and joint pain were assessed using a 4-point scale (0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain, and 3 = severe pain). The maximum unassisted mouth opening (MUMO) was measured in millimeters, both with and pain-free. Outcomes were evaluated at baseline (T0) and after a 3-months intervention period (T1).
Results: Both treatments significantly reduced muscle and joint pain intensity at most assessed sites. The reduction in pain with ME compared to CT was statistically significant at the right lateral pole of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) (p = 0.048; rrb = 0.348). After three months, ME resulted in greater pain-free MUMO (T0 vs. T1; p = 0.004; rrb = 0.594), and the increase in MUMO was greater than that observed with CT (p < 0.001; rrb = 0.742).
Conclusion: ME and CT similarly reduced palpatory pain, with ME showing greater clinical impact at the right lateral pole. Both treatments led to significant improvements in the masseter and TMJ pole. ME also provided superior, clinically meaningful gains in pain-free MUMO, positioning it as a preferred option when enhancing jaw mobility is a primary goal in TMD management.
期刊介绍:
QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.