Disfluencies reflect a... uh... competition between response options: Evidence from a drift diffusion analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Aurélie Pistono, Mehdi Senoussi, Robert J Hartsuiker
{"title":"Disfluencies reflect a... uh... competition between response options: Evidence from a drift diffusion analysis.","authors":"Aurélie Pistono, Mehdi Senoussi, Robert J Hartsuiker","doi":"10.3758/s13423-024-02638-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disfluency can occur when a speaker faces difficulty in language production, but it is also as a strategy to stall for time and create an illusion of continuity in speech. To better understand the origin of disfluency, the current study used a drift diffusion model (DDM) in a context of semantic competition. We developed a speeded version of the picture-word interference paradigm, in which participants name pictures while ignoring distractor words. We applied the DDM approach to data from related vs. unrelated distractors but also from fluent versus disfluent answers in the related condition (e.g., \"apple\" vs. \"hm... a-apple\"). All differences between conditions were mapped onto the drift rate parameter. Unrelated distractor words resulted in a higher drift rate compared with semantic distractors, and correct fluent answers resulted in a higher drift rate compared with correct disfluent answers. Our findings suggest that semantic interference taps into the process of spreading activation through the lexical-semantic system. Most importantly, disfluency in the picture-naming task reflects competition between response options and is not a strategy from the speaker to stall for time to accurately name the picture.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-024-02638-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disfluency can occur when a speaker faces difficulty in language production, but it is also as a strategy to stall for time and create an illusion of continuity in speech. To better understand the origin of disfluency, the current study used a drift diffusion model (DDM) in a context of semantic competition. We developed a speeded version of the picture-word interference paradigm, in which participants name pictures while ignoring distractor words. We applied the DDM approach to data from related vs. unrelated distractors but also from fluent versus disfluent answers in the related condition (e.g., "apple" vs. "hm... a-apple"). All differences between conditions were mapped onto the drift rate parameter. Unrelated distractor words resulted in a higher drift rate compared with semantic distractors, and correct fluent answers resulted in a higher drift rate compared with correct disfluent answers. Our findings suggest that semantic interference taps into the process of spreading activation through the lexical-semantic system. Most importantly, disfluency in the picture-naming task reflects competition between response options and is not a strategy from the speaker to stall for time to accurately name the picture.

不流畅反映了…嗯…反应选项之间的竞争:来自漂移扩散分析的证据。
当说话者在语言表达上遇到困难时,就会出现不流利的情况,但它也是一种拖延时间的策略,创造一种语言连贯的错觉。为了更好地理解非流畅性的起源,本研究在语义竞争的背景下使用了漂移扩散模型(DDM)。我们开发了一个快速版本的图片-单词干扰范式,参与者在忽略干扰词的同时说出图片。我们将DDM方法应用于相关与不相关干扰因素的数据,以及相关条件下流利与不流利答案的数据(例如,“苹果”与“苹果”)。“嗯…个苹果”)。所有条件之间的差异都映射到漂移率参数上。不相关干扰词的漂移率高于语义干扰词,正确流利答案的漂移率高于不流利答案。我们的研究结果表明,语义干扰通过词汇-语义系统进入了扩散激活的过程。最重要的是,图片命名任务中的不流畅反映了反应选项之间的竞争,而不是说话者拖延时间以准确命名图片的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: The journal provides coverage spanning a broad spectrum of topics in all areas of experimental psychology. The journal is primarily dedicated to the publication of theory and review articles and brief reports of outstanding experimental work. Areas of coverage include cognitive psychology broadly construed, including but not limited to action, perception, & attention, language, learning & memory, reasoning & decision making, and social cognition. We welcome submissions that approach these issues from a variety of perspectives such as behavioral measurements, comparative psychology, development, evolutionary psychology, genetics, neuroscience, and quantitative/computational modeling. We particularly encourage integrative research that crosses traditional content and methodological boundaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信