Widening the diversity of clinical academic staff: an enquiry.

IF 1.5 Q3 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Education for Primary Care Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1080/14739879.2024.2435611
Sajni Chopra, Charlotte Petrie, Hugh Alberti
{"title":"Widening the diversity of clinical academic staff: an enquiry.","authors":"Sajni Chopra, Charlotte Petrie, Hugh Alberti","doi":"10.1080/14739879.2024.2435611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lack of diversity in academic staff is a national problem. At an interview for academic GP positions at our institution, there were no applicants of ethnic minority background. This does not represent our undergraduate GP teacher workforce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To understand reasons behind the lack of applicant diversity, we held two focus groups of GP teachers at our institution's annual GP teaching fora. These were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six key themes emerged. The major theme attributed the barriers to applying for an academic GP post to individual, institutional and cultural factors. Individual factors included a concern of being under-qualified, out of comfort-zone as well as a lack of awareness of the role. Institutional factors noted insufficient ethnic minority academic role models and inaccessible advertising. Cultural factors illustrate increased challenge, disproportionate stress and paucity of contacts. Our participants discussed their recommendations for change and reflected on their positive experiences.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our research highlights the interplay of factors affecting applicant diversity in academic GP posts. Intersectional theory helps explain the disadvantage, and role modelling is a mechanism to break free. Change is achievable. Interventions can be targeted at both individuals and institutions, to provide momentum for cultural rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46436,"journal":{"name":"Education for Primary Care","volume":" ","pages":"40-46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2024.2435611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Lack of diversity in academic staff is a national problem. At an interview for academic GP positions at our institution, there were no applicants of ethnic minority background. This does not represent our undergraduate GP teacher workforce.

Methods: To understand reasons behind the lack of applicant diversity, we held two focus groups of GP teachers at our institution's annual GP teaching fora. These were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed.

Results: Six key themes emerged. The major theme attributed the barriers to applying for an academic GP post to individual, institutional and cultural factors. Individual factors included a concern of being under-qualified, out of comfort-zone as well as a lack of awareness of the role. Institutional factors noted insufficient ethnic minority academic role models and inaccessible advertising. Cultural factors illustrate increased challenge, disproportionate stress and paucity of contacts. Our participants discussed their recommendations for change and reflected on their positive experiences.

Discussion: Our research highlights the interplay of factors affecting applicant diversity in academic GP posts. Intersectional theory helps explain the disadvantage, and role modelling is a mechanism to break free. Change is achievable. Interventions can be targeted at both individuals and institutions, to provide momentum for cultural rehabilitation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education for Primary Care
Education for Primary Care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Education for Primary Care aims to reflect the best experience, expertise and innovative ideas in the development of undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing primary care education. The journal is UK based but welcomes contributions from all over the world. Readers will benefit from the broader perspectives on educational activities provided through the contributions of all health professionals, including general practitioners, nurses, midwives, health visitors, community nurses and managers. This sharing of experiences has the potential for enhancing healthcare delivery and for promoting interprofessional working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信