The effects of test on associative memory depend on semantic relevancy levels: evidence of event-related potentials.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuroreport Pub Date : 2025-03-05 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1097/WNR.0000000000002143
Wenting Geng, Yan Wang, Xintong Liu, Chunping Yan, Yunbing Zhang, Tian Gao
{"title":"The effects of test on associative memory depend on semantic relevancy levels: evidence of event-related potentials.","authors":"Wenting Geng, Yan Wang, Xintong Liu, Chunping Yan, Yunbing Zhang, Tian Gao","doi":"10.1097/WNR.0000000000002143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to investigate how the level of semantic relevance influences the effects of test on associative memory through bottom-up cognitive processes. This study manipulated the levels of semantic relevancy using synonym and nonsynonym pairs in a three-phase testing effect paradigm (an initial encoding phase, a cued-recall test as retrieval practice, and a final test phase) to explore the effects of testing effect and semantic relevancy on associative recognition by bottom-up processes using the event-related potential (ERP). The behavioral results suggested that the test practice (relative to the restudy) significantly facilitated memory retrieval in high semantic relevancy pairs during the final test phase. The ERP results showed that the testing effect tended toward right laterality over time in the retrieval practice phase. Moreover, test practice (relative to the restudy) significantly enhanced FN400 for high semantic relevancy and intact pairs and significantly enhanced FN400 and late positive complex for high semantic relevancy and rearranged pairs in the final test phase. These results suggest that the test practice provided a greater boost in memory encoding and retrieval for high semantic relevancy items. Specifically, the effects of test on associative memory is modulated by the level of semantic relevancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19213,"journal":{"name":"Neuroreport","volume":" ","pages":"217-222"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroreport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000002143","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to investigate how the level of semantic relevance influences the effects of test on associative memory through bottom-up cognitive processes. This study manipulated the levels of semantic relevancy using synonym and nonsynonym pairs in a three-phase testing effect paradigm (an initial encoding phase, a cued-recall test as retrieval practice, and a final test phase) to explore the effects of testing effect and semantic relevancy on associative recognition by bottom-up processes using the event-related potential (ERP). The behavioral results suggested that the test practice (relative to the restudy) significantly facilitated memory retrieval in high semantic relevancy pairs during the final test phase. The ERP results showed that the testing effect tended toward right laterality over time in the retrieval practice phase. Moreover, test practice (relative to the restudy) significantly enhanced FN400 for high semantic relevancy and intact pairs and significantly enhanced FN400 and late positive complex for high semantic relevancy and rearranged pairs in the final test phase. These results suggest that the test practice provided a greater boost in memory encoding and retrieval for high semantic relevancy items. Specifically, the effects of test on associative memory is modulated by the level of semantic relevancy.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroreport
Neuroreport 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
150
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: NeuroReport is a channel for rapid communication of new findings in neuroscience. It is a forum for the publication of short but complete reports of important studies that require very fast publication. Papers are accepted on the basis of the novelty of their finding, on their significance for neuroscience and on a clear need for rapid publication. Preliminary communications are not suitable for the Journal. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. The core interest of the Journal is on studies that cast light on how the brain (and the whole of the nervous system) works. We aim to give authors a decision on their submission within 2-5 weeks, and all accepted articles appear in the next issue to press.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信