Gamma-aminobutyric acid and glutamate/glutamine associations with tinnitus and hearing loss.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuroreport Pub Date : 2025-03-05 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1097/WNR.0000000000002137
Rafay Ali Khan, Zepeng Wang, Ruiyang Zhao, Gibbeum Kim, Fan Lam, Fatima Tazeena Husain
{"title":"Gamma-aminobutyric acid and glutamate/glutamine associations with tinnitus and hearing loss.","authors":"Rafay Ali Khan, Zepeng Wang, Ruiyang Zhao, Gibbeum Kim, Fan Lam, Fatima Tazeena Husain","doi":"10.1097/WNR.0000000000002137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study aimed to evaluate the association between concentrations of the metabolites gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate/glutamine (Glx), which have predominantly inhibitory and excitatory effects on neural function, respectively, in adults with tinnitus and hearing loss, those with only hearing loss, and controls with neither condition. Metabolite concentrations in all three participant groups were assessed via magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in auditory and fronto-parietal regions. The concentration of a third metabolite, creatine (Cre) was also acquired. Ratios of GABA/Cre, Glx/Cre, and Glx/GABA were compared across six manually delineated regions of interest (ROIs). Neither GABA/Cre nor Glx/Cre showed significant group differences in any of the six ROIs. For the Glx/GABA ratio, group-level differences were seen only in the right auditory cortex, where the control group had a significantly larger ratio than the group with tinnitus and hearing loss. While results largely did not replicate previous human work in this area, we cannot exclude the possibility of a neurochemical mechanism underlying any causal relationship between hearing loss and tinnitus, particularly given the finding of altered balance in excitatory/inhibitory metabolites in the right auditory cortex. In the context of previous work, the right auditory cortex is highlighted as a particular region of interest for further investigation. Methodological differences in human studies and inconsistent findings in animal studies have thus far impeded the field's ability to gain direct insight into the relationship between tinnitus and hearing loss, and so we make some suggestions to help design future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19213,"journal":{"name":"Neuroreport","volume":" ","pages":"196-201"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroreport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000002137","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the association between concentrations of the metabolites gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate/glutamine (Glx), which have predominantly inhibitory and excitatory effects on neural function, respectively, in adults with tinnitus and hearing loss, those with only hearing loss, and controls with neither condition. Metabolite concentrations in all three participant groups were assessed via magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in auditory and fronto-parietal regions. The concentration of a third metabolite, creatine (Cre) was also acquired. Ratios of GABA/Cre, Glx/Cre, and Glx/GABA were compared across six manually delineated regions of interest (ROIs). Neither GABA/Cre nor Glx/Cre showed significant group differences in any of the six ROIs. For the Glx/GABA ratio, group-level differences were seen only in the right auditory cortex, where the control group had a significantly larger ratio than the group with tinnitus and hearing loss. While results largely did not replicate previous human work in this area, we cannot exclude the possibility of a neurochemical mechanism underlying any causal relationship between hearing loss and tinnitus, particularly given the finding of altered balance in excitatory/inhibitory metabolites in the right auditory cortex. In the context of previous work, the right auditory cortex is highlighted as a particular region of interest for further investigation. Methodological differences in human studies and inconsistent findings in animal studies have thus far impeded the field's ability to gain direct insight into the relationship between tinnitus and hearing loss, and so we make some suggestions to help design future studies.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroreport
Neuroreport 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
150
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: NeuroReport is a channel for rapid communication of new findings in neuroscience. It is a forum for the publication of short but complete reports of important studies that require very fast publication. Papers are accepted on the basis of the novelty of their finding, on their significance for neuroscience and on a clear need for rapid publication. Preliminary communications are not suitable for the Journal. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. The core interest of the Journal is on studies that cast light on how the brain (and the whole of the nervous system) works. We aim to give authors a decision on their submission within 2-5 weeks, and all accepted articles appear in the next issue to press.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信