Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Inner Ear and Internal Auditory Canal Structures in the Presence of a Cochlear Implant.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004445
Rebecca Susan Dewey, Robert A Dineen, Matthew Clemence, Nitin Menon, Richard Bowtell, Patrick Boyle, Douglas E H Hartley
{"title":"Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Inner Ear and Internal Auditory Canal Structures in the Presence of a Cochlear Implant.","authors":"Rebecca Susan Dewey, Robert A Dineen, Matthew Clemence, Nitin Menon, Richard Bowtell, Patrick Boyle, Douglas E H Hartley","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether the internal auditory canal (IAC) can be visualized using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in users of a cochlear implant (CI) model that can safely undergo MRI at 3 T.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Four normally hearing controls and three individuals unilaterally implanted with a HiRes Ultra 3D (Advanced Bionics LLC, California, USA).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants underwent 3 T MRI using sequences appropriate for the postoperative surveillance of the IAC. Images in normally hearing individuals were acquired after placing a fully functional, unpowered, CI underneath a swimming cap at each of eight candidate scalp positions, four on each side of the head. Images were compared to a control condition without a CI present. and CI users were imaged with similar sequences.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>In normally hearing controls, the likely impact of the artifact on detection of pathology for multiple neuroradiological locations as rated by two independent radiologists. In CI users, a qualitative assessment of the diagnostic usability of images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Visibility of the ipsilateral IAC and cochlea varied among the three CI users, with images from one participant deemed largely usable, while those from the other two participants exhibited less diagnostic certainty, likely due to differences in implant locations and cranial/neuroanatomical variations. Ratings of images in normally hearing participants showed that more middle-to-anterior CI locations were associated with reduced likelihood of overlooking gross abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Through meticulous surgical placement, bilateral IAC visualization may be achievable for monitoring chronic health conditions such as tumor surveillance in high-risk patients, and as a safety monitoring outcome measure in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":"e105-e108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11939083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004445","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether the internal auditory canal (IAC) can be visualized using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in users of a cochlear implant (CI) model that can safely undergo MRI at 3 T.

Patients: Four normally hearing controls and three individuals unilaterally implanted with a HiRes Ultra 3D (Advanced Bionics LLC, California, USA).

Interventions: Participants underwent 3 T MRI using sequences appropriate for the postoperative surveillance of the IAC. Images in normally hearing individuals were acquired after placing a fully functional, unpowered, CI underneath a swimming cap at each of eight candidate scalp positions, four on each side of the head. Images were compared to a control condition without a CI present. and CI users were imaged with similar sequences.

Main outcome measures: In normally hearing controls, the likely impact of the artifact on detection of pathology for multiple neuroradiological locations as rated by two independent radiologists. In CI users, a qualitative assessment of the diagnostic usability of images.

Results: Visibility of the ipsilateral IAC and cochlea varied among the three CI users, with images from one participant deemed largely usable, while those from the other two participants exhibited less diagnostic certainty, likely due to differences in implant locations and cranial/neuroanatomical variations. Ratings of images in normally hearing participants showed that more middle-to-anterior CI locations were associated with reduced likelihood of overlooking gross abnormalities.

Conclusion: Through meticulous surgical placement, bilateral IAC visualization may be achievable for monitoring chronic health conditions such as tumor surveillance in high-risk patients, and as a safety monitoring outcome measure in clinical trials.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信