Cochlear Implantation in Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery: Diagnostic Accuracy Analysis of Intraoperative Monitoring with Intracochlear Electrode.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004437
Elisabetta Zanoletti, Stefano Concheri, Giulia Tealdo, Diego Cazzador, Valerio M Di Pasquale Fiasca, Sebastiano Franchella, Giuseppe Impala', Davide Brotto
{"title":"Cochlear Implantation in Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery: Diagnostic Accuracy Analysis of Intraoperative Monitoring with Intracochlear Electrode.","authors":"Elisabetta Zanoletti, Stefano Concheri, Giulia Tealdo, Diego Cazzador, Valerio M Di Pasquale Fiasca, Sebastiano Franchella, Giuseppe Impala', Davide Brotto","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the role of intraoperative cochlear nerve (CN) electric monitoring with MED-EL intracochlear test electrode (ITE) in assessing the CN functional integrity.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients with intrameatal or 2 to 13 mm in the cerebello-pontine angle vestibular schwannoma (VS), not suitable for hearing preservation surgery but eligible for tumor resection via translabyrinthine approach and simultaneous cochlear implant (CI) rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>ITE was used to register electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (eABR) before and after VS resection. All patients with anatomical preservation of CN underwent CI, regardless of eABR results, which served as the index test and was compared with postoperative sound perception by CI stimuli (gold standard test).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve of seventeen cases allowed anatomical preservation of CN and were considered for the study. Seven of twelve cases demonstrated sound detection with CI, and six of twelve showed some degree of speech discrimination. eABR test with ITE achieved an accuracy of 66.7%, a sensitivity of 42.9%, and a specificity of 100%. Positive and negative predictive values were 100% and 55.6%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When eABR can be evoked with ITE, the attempt of CI was likely to be successful, whereas in cases of eABR absence, other factors should be considered to reduce unsuccessful CI and not preclude rehabilitation in patients who would benefit from CI. Further studies and longer follow-up are needed to analyze the role of ITE in VS surgery with CI.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":"437-445"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11939092/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004437","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the role of intraoperative cochlear nerve (CN) electric monitoring with MED-EL intracochlear test electrode (ITE) in assessing the CN functional integrity.

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

Patients: Patients with intrameatal or 2 to 13 mm in the cerebello-pontine angle vestibular schwannoma (VS), not suitable for hearing preservation surgery but eligible for tumor resection via translabyrinthine approach and simultaneous cochlear implant (CI) rehabilitation.

Intervention: ITE was used to register electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (eABR) before and after VS resection. All patients with anatomical preservation of CN underwent CI, regardless of eABR results, which served as the index test and was compared with postoperative sound perception by CI stimuli (gold standard test).

Results: Twelve of seventeen cases allowed anatomical preservation of CN and were considered for the study. Seven of twelve cases demonstrated sound detection with CI, and six of twelve showed some degree of speech discrimination. eABR test with ITE achieved an accuracy of 66.7%, a sensitivity of 42.9%, and a specificity of 100%. Positive and negative predictive values were 100% and 55.6%, respectively.

Conclusion: When eABR can be evoked with ITE, the attempt of CI was likely to be successful, whereas in cases of eABR absence, other factors should be considered to reduce unsuccessful CI and not preclude rehabilitation in patients who would benefit from CI. Further studies and longer follow-up are needed to analyze the role of ITE in VS surgery with CI.

前庭神经鞘瘤人工耳蜗植入术:术中耳蜗内电极监测诊断准确性分析。
目的:探讨MED-EL型耳蜗内试验电极(ITE)术中耳蜗神经电监测在评估耳蜗神经功能完整性中的作用。单位:三级转诊中心。患者:颅内或小脑-桥脑角2 ~ 13mm前庭神经鞘瘤(VS),不适合行保听手术,但符合经迷路入路肿瘤切除及同时人工耳蜗(CI)康复的患者。干预:在VS切除术前后使用ITE记录电诱发听觉脑干反应(eABR)。无论eABR结果如何,所有CN解剖保存的患者都进行了CI,作为指标测试,并与CI刺激的术后声音感知(金标准测试)进行比较。结果:17例病例中有12例允许CN的解剖保存,并考虑进行研究。12个病例中有7个表现出了CI的声音检测,12个病例中有6个表现出了一定程度的言语辨别。结合ITE的eABR检测准确率为66.7%,灵敏度为42.9%,特异性为100%。阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为55.6%。结论:当ITE能诱发eABR时,CI的尝试有可能成功,而在eABR缺失的情况下,应考虑其他因素来减少CI的失败,不排除患者从CI中获益的康复。需要进一步的研究和更长时间的随访来分析ITE在合并CI的VS手术中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信