Structural validity of the Anxiety Symptom Scale - a Danish validation study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1080/08039488.2025.2466642
Henrik Schou Pedersen, Karl Bang Christensen, Anders Prior, Kaj Sparle Christensen
{"title":"Structural validity of the Anxiety Symptom Scale - a Danish validation study.","authors":"Henrik Schou Pedersen, Karl Bang Christensen, Anders Prior, Kaj Sparle Christensen","doi":"10.1080/08039488.2025.2466642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Anxiety Symptom Scale (ASS) is a ten-item psychometric test, which is frequently used for screening purposes in Danish general practice. The ASS includes nine items on symptoms of anxiety disorders and one item on functional impairment caused by these symptoms. Previous research indicates that reducing the number of response categories may benefit the test and that it may provide a unidimensional measure of global anxiety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We made a modified version of the ASS with fewer response categories per item. We compared the structure of the two versions in a cohort of respondents recruited from three different settings: general practitioner during a consultation (setting 1), mental health associations (setting 2), and waiting room in a single general practice (setting 3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both versions were fitted to a bifactor model; the nine anxiety items loaded on a general factor, and the individual items addressing specific anxiety disorders loaded on their specific factor. The original version provided a better fit than the modified version. The model suggests that the ASS measures primarily a single underlying trait. Functional impairment was well predicted by the general factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The first nine items of the ASS can be considered a unidimensional measure of global anxiety, showing a substantial correlation with functional impairment. This makes the instrument useful for general practitioners in making initial treatment decisions. The performance of the instrument did not improve by reducing the number of response categories or removing one of the panic anxiety attack items.</p>","PeriodicalId":19201,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"166-174"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2025.2466642","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Anxiety Symptom Scale (ASS) is a ten-item psychometric test, which is frequently used for screening purposes in Danish general practice. The ASS includes nine items on symptoms of anxiety disorders and one item on functional impairment caused by these symptoms. Previous research indicates that reducing the number of response categories may benefit the test and that it may provide a unidimensional measure of global anxiety.

Methods: We made a modified version of the ASS with fewer response categories per item. We compared the structure of the two versions in a cohort of respondents recruited from three different settings: general practitioner during a consultation (setting 1), mental health associations (setting 2), and waiting room in a single general practice (setting 3).

Results: Both versions were fitted to a bifactor model; the nine anxiety items loaded on a general factor, and the individual items addressing specific anxiety disorders loaded on their specific factor. The original version provided a better fit than the modified version. The model suggests that the ASS measures primarily a single underlying trait. Functional impairment was well predicted by the general factor.

Conclusion: The first nine items of the ASS can be considered a unidimensional measure of global anxiety, showing a substantial correlation with functional impairment. This makes the instrument useful for general practitioners in making initial treatment decisions. The performance of the instrument did not improve by reducing the number of response categories or removing one of the panic anxiety attack items.

焦虑症状量表的结构效度——丹麦的一项验证研究。
简介:焦虑症状量表(ASS)是一个十项心理测试,在丹麦的一般实践中经常用于筛查目的。该量表包括9个焦虑障碍症状项目和1个由这些症状引起的功能障碍项目。先前的研究表明,减少反应类别的数量可能有利于测试,并且它可能提供对全球焦虑的单向度测量。方法:我们制作了一个改进版的问卷,减少了每个条目的回答类别。我们比较了从三个不同环境中招募的受访者的两个版本的结构:全科医生在咨询期间(设置1),心理健康协会(设置2)和单一全科医生的候诊室(设置3)。结果:两个版本都符合双因素模型;九个焦虑项目加载在一个一般因素上,而针对特定焦虑障碍的个别项目加载在它们的特定因素上。原来的版本比修改后的版本更适合。该模型表明,ASS主要测量单一的潜在特征。一般因子能较好地预测功能损害。结论:ASS的前9个项目可以被认为是整体焦虑的单维测量,显示出与功能障碍的显著相关性。这使得该仪器对全科医生做出初步治疗决定很有用。通过减少反应类别的数量或删除一个惊恐焦虑发作项目,该工具的性能并没有得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
86
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Nordic Journal of Psychiatry publishes international research on all areas of psychiatry. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry is the official journal for the eight psychiatry associations in the Nordic and Baltic countries. The journal aims to provide a leading international forum for high quality research on all themes of psychiatry including: Child psychiatry Adult psychiatry Psychotherapy Pharmacotherapy Social psychiatry Psychosomatic medicine Nordic Journal of Psychiatry accepts original research articles, review articles, brief reports, editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信