Determining the optimal hematoma volume-based thresholds for surgical and medical strategies in basal ganglia hemorrhage.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Chonnawee Chaisawasthomrong, Atthaporn Boongird
{"title":"Determining the optimal hematoma volume-based thresholds for surgical and medical strategies in basal ganglia hemorrhage.","authors":"Chonnawee Chaisawasthomrong, Atthaporn Boongird","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03403-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hematoma volume is a significant concern in basal ganglia hemorrhage, with no clear cutoff to guide the choice between conservative and surgical management, particularly for larger hematomas where the optimal approach remains controversial. This study aimed to determine the maximum hematoma volume suitable for conservative treatment and the volume that necessitates surgical intervention in patients with basal ganglia hemorrhage. A total of 387 cases of basal ganglia hemorrhage from 2019 to 2021 were analyzed, evaluating patient demographics, medical history, and initial CT brain scans to assess hematoma volume. Outcomes of medical and surgical treatments were compared using multivariate logistic and Cox regression analysis. For patients treated with medical management alone, mortality rates did not differ significantly between hematoma volumes of 10-39.9 mL and those under 10 mL. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified a cutoff volume of 45.3 mL, with a sensitivity of 80.82% and specificity of 91.67% for predicting survival. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a reduced mortality hazard ratio (0.17) with surgical intervention for hematomas exceeding 45.3 mL. However, surgical treatment for volumes under 30 mL was associated with higher mortality compared to medical management. Surgical intervention showed a clear survival benefit for hematoma volumes of at least 60 mL, while conservative treatment remained appropriate for volumes up to 45.3 mL. For volumes between 45.3 mL and 59.9 mL, the decision to operate should be guided by the surgeon's judgment and patient-specific factors such as comorbidities, brain atrophy. In conclusion, conservative management is effective for hematomas up to 45.3 mL, while surgical intervention is absolutely indicated for volumes of 60 mL or more. These findings provide valuable guidance for optimizing treatment strategies in basal ganglia hemorrhage.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"255"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11839887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03403-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hematoma volume is a significant concern in basal ganglia hemorrhage, with no clear cutoff to guide the choice between conservative and surgical management, particularly for larger hematomas where the optimal approach remains controversial. This study aimed to determine the maximum hematoma volume suitable for conservative treatment and the volume that necessitates surgical intervention in patients with basal ganglia hemorrhage. A total of 387 cases of basal ganglia hemorrhage from 2019 to 2021 were analyzed, evaluating patient demographics, medical history, and initial CT brain scans to assess hematoma volume. Outcomes of medical and surgical treatments were compared using multivariate logistic and Cox regression analysis. For patients treated with medical management alone, mortality rates did not differ significantly between hematoma volumes of 10-39.9 mL and those under 10 mL. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified a cutoff volume of 45.3 mL, with a sensitivity of 80.82% and specificity of 91.67% for predicting survival. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a reduced mortality hazard ratio (0.17) with surgical intervention for hematomas exceeding 45.3 mL. However, surgical treatment for volumes under 30 mL was associated with higher mortality compared to medical management. Surgical intervention showed a clear survival benefit for hematoma volumes of at least 60 mL, while conservative treatment remained appropriate for volumes up to 45.3 mL. For volumes between 45.3 mL and 59.9 mL, the decision to operate should be guided by the surgeon's judgment and patient-specific factors such as comorbidities, brain atrophy. In conclusion, conservative management is effective for hematomas up to 45.3 mL, while surgical intervention is absolutely indicated for volumes of 60 mL or more. These findings provide valuable guidance for optimizing treatment strategies in basal ganglia hemorrhage.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信