National variation in delayed cord clamping implementation - A survey of the challenges in universal adoption of DCC in the United Kingdom.

Q2 Medicine
Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1177/19345798251318596
Ahmed Marya, Claudia Chetcuti Ganado
{"title":"National variation in delayed cord clamping implementation - A survey of the challenges in universal adoption of DCC in the United Kingdom.","authors":"Ahmed Marya, Claudia Chetcuti Ganado","doi":"10.1177/19345798251318596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundEvidence shows that allowing the umbilical cord to pulsate for 1-3 minutes before clamping greatly improves newborn outcomes. In preterm infants, DCC reduces mortality by a third, reduces sepsis, bowel inflammation, and severe brain bleeds yet uptake has been variable in the latter cohort. Our survey aimed to understand the challenges faced when implementing DCC.MethodsSurvey questions were designed and user tested prior to dissemination. An electronic and word format of the questionnaire were sent through emails to units in England and Wales. The survey was also disseminated via social media.ResultsA total of 116 responses were obtained with 44% being from level three units and 50% from level two and the remainder from Level one. Although all but 1 respondent said they implemented DCC in their hospital, 30% respondents said they only apply DCC for stable term babies. The remaining 70% implement DCC for both preterm and term stable babies. While 21% of respondents said they implemented cord intact stabilisation for planned deliveries, only 3% implemented it in emergency scenarios. 71% of respondents undertaking cord intact stabilisation use the Lifestart TM trolley. Respondents highlighted several challenges when using Lifestart particularly the lack of familiarity with its use, need for advance planning and ineffective heating surface.ConclusionThe survey highlights that challenges in adopting DCC in extreme preterm and sick infants remain unaddressed. More research is required to enable delivery of placental transfusion safely allowing the needs of all newborns to be met.</p>","PeriodicalId":16537,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine","volume":" ","pages":"150-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19345798251318596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundEvidence shows that allowing the umbilical cord to pulsate for 1-3 minutes before clamping greatly improves newborn outcomes. In preterm infants, DCC reduces mortality by a third, reduces sepsis, bowel inflammation, and severe brain bleeds yet uptake has been variable in the latter cohort. Our survey aimed to understand the challenges faced when implementing DCC.MethodsSurvey questions were designed and user tested prior to dissemination. An electronic and word format of the questionnaire were sent through emails to units in England and Wales. The survey was also disseminated via social media.ResultsA total of 116 responses were obtained with 44% being from level three units and 50% from level two and the remainder from Level one. Although all but 1 respondent said they implemented DCC in their hospital, 30% respondents said they only apply DCC for stable term babies. The remaining 70% implement DCC for both preterm and term stable babies. While 21% of respondents said they implemented cord intact stabilisation for planned deliveries, only 3% implemented it in emergency scenarios. 71% of respondents undertaking cord intact stabilisation use the Lifestart TM trolley. Respondents highlighted several challenges when using Lifestart particularly the lack of familiarity with its use, need for advance planning and ineffective heating surface.ConclusionThe survey highlights that challenges in adopting DCC in extreme preterm and sick infants remain unaddressed. More research is required to enable delivery of placental transfusion safely allowing the needs of all newborns to be met.

延迟脐带夹紧实施的国家差异-对英国普遍采用DCC的挑战的调查。
背景:有证据表明,在夹紧脐带前让脐带脉动1-3分钟可大大改善新生儿结局。在早产儿中,DCC降低了三分之一的死亡率,减少了败血症、肠道炎症和严重的脑出血,但在后一组中,摄取情况有所不同。我们的调查旨在了解在实施DCC时面临的挑战。方法:在传播前设计调查问题并对用户进行测试。电子和文字格式的调查问卷通过电子邮件发送给英格兰和威尔士的单位。该调查还通过社交媒体传播。结果:共获得116份答复,其中44%来自三级单位,50%来自二级单位,其余来自一级单位。尽管除1名受访者外,所有受访者都表示他们在医院实施了DCC,但30%的受访者表示他们只对稳定的足月婴儿实施DCC。其余70%对早产儿和足月稳定婴儿实施DCC。虽然21%的受访者表示,他们在计划分娩时实施了脐带完整稳定,但只有3%的受访者在紧急情况下实施了脐带完整稳定。71%的受访者使用Lifestart TM台车进行脐带完整稳定。受访者强调了使用Lifestart时面临的几个挑战,特别是对其使用方法不熟悉、需要提前规划以及加热表面无效。结论:调查强调了在极端早产儿和患病婴儿中采用DCC的挑战仍然没有得到解决。需要更多的研究来确保胎盘输血的安全,从而满足所有新生儿的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine
Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信