Comparing Maintenance Therapy Achievement for Opioid-Experienced Patients Converted to Buprenorphine for Chronic Pain Management.

IF 0.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Caylee Sams, Serena Cheng
{"title":"Comparing Maintenance Therapy Achievement for Opioid-Experienced Patients Converted to Buprenorphine for Chronic Pain Management.","authors":"Caylee Sams, Serena Cheng","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2025.2464686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treatment of chronic, non-cancer pain can be challenging in the presence of long-term opioid therapy (LTOT). Buprenorphine products can provide a unique option for chronic pain treatment due to the improved safety profile with a ceiling effect on respiratory depression. Drug manufacturers provide recommendations for conversion from full mu agonist to buprenorphine which typically includes tapering to lower morphine equivalent doses (MEDD). This study will attempt to compare if there is a difference in the ability of achieving buprenorphine maintenance therapy for chronic pain based on the starting opioid MEDD. This study's primary endpoint is the difference in ability to achieve buprenorphine maintenance therapy for chronic, non-cancer pain based on baseline MEDD (i.e., ≤30 MEDD vs >30 MEDD). Secondary endpoints will describe method of conversion to buprenorphine, difference in frequency of follow up and average time to achieve maintenance doses. There was no difference in ability to achieve buprenorphine maintenance doses between either group. Approximately 40% of patients in each group achieved maintenance doses regardless of baseline MEDD. Patients on higher MEDDs had the same likelihood of achieving buprenorphine maintenance therapy for chronic pain as those were at 30 MEDD and can be considered for buprenorphine therapy without tapering first.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2025.2464686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Treatment of chronic, non-cancer pain can be challenging in the presence of long-term opioid therapy (LTOT). Buprenorphine products can provide a unique option for chronic pain treatment due to the improved safety profile with a ceiling effect on respiratory depression. Drug manufacturers provide recommendations for conversion from full mu agonist to buprenorphine which typically includes tapering to lower morphine equivalent doses (MEDD). This study will attempt to compare if there is a difference in the ability of achieving buprenorphine maintenance therapy for chronic pain based on the starting opioid MEDD. This study's primary endpoint is the difference in ability to achieve buprenorphine maintenance therapy for chronic, non-cancer pain based on baseline MEDD (i.e., ≤30 MEDD vs >30 MEDD). Secondary endpoints will describe method of conversion to buprenorphine, difference in frequency of follow up and average time to achieve maintenance doses. There was no difference in ability to achieve buprenorphine maintenance doses between either group. Approximately 40% of patients in each group achieved maintenance doses regardless of baseline MEDD. Patients on higher MEDDs had the same likelihood of achieving buprenorphine maintenance therapy for chronic pain as those were at 30 MEDD and can be considered for buprenorphine therapy without tapering first.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信