Correlation of predelivery Rotational Thromboelastometry readings with the risk of postpartum hemorrhage during delivery: The ROTEM Study.

Q2 Medicine
Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-03 DOI:10.1177/19345798241291327
Joaquin A Calderon, Ahmed M Ebeid, Sean M Lee, Homa K Ahmadzia
{"title":"Correlation of predelivery Rotational Thromboelastometry readings with the risk of postpartum hemorrhage during delivery: The ROTEM Study.","authors":"Joaquin A Calderon, Ahmed M Ebeid, Sean M Lee, Homa K Ahmadzia","doi":"10.1177/19345798241291327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundInconsistency in defining postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), and the inability of current tools and approaches to accurately predict PPH have led to the exploration of innovative methods. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) point-of-care technology provides real-time assessment of the clotting process facilitating time-efficient hemostatic interventions. Our study investigates the utility of ROTEM parameters for predicting individual risk of PPH.MethodsThis multi-site, prospective observational cohort study recruited 92 women who underwent scheduled cesarean delivery and normal spontaneous vaginal delivery at university-affiliated hospitals from 2018 to 2023. We included women between 18 and 50 years old at ≥34 weeks of gestation. Subjects were approached in the hospital pre-admission testing unit during their routine pre-operative blood draws, typically at least 72 h in advance of their planned cesarean delivery. Participants were also enrolled at the hospital once they arrived for admission a few hours before their procedure. ROTEM parameters EXTEM clotting time (CT), clot formation time (CFT), alpha angle, A10, A20, maximum clot formation (MCF), maximum lysis, were measured preoperative.ResultsWe found significant effects of age, blood loss type, delivery mode, gestational age, and maximum lysis on blood loss. The reduced model predicted that every one-percent increase in maximum lysis was associated with a 44-milliliter increase in blood loss and every one-year increase in age was associated with a 19-milliliter increase in blood loss. On average, cesarean deliveries resulted in 522 more milliliters of blood loss than normal spontaneous vaginal delivery.ConclusionThe ROTEM EXTEM maximum lysis parameter has a significant effect on blood loss. Larger prospective clinical trials in conjunction with a prompt definition of the ranges of reference values will strengthen these advances to provide a rapid assessment and guide early interventions to prevent severe obstetric bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":16537,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine","volume":" ","pages":"18-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19345798241291327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundInconsistency in defining postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), and the inability of current tools and approaches to accurately predict PPH have led to the exploration of innovative methods. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) point-of-care technology provides real-time assessment of the clotting process facilitating time-efficient hemostatic interventions. Our study investigates the utility of ROTEM parameters for predicting individual risk of PPH.MethodsThis multi-site, prospective observational cohort study recruited 92 women who underwent scheduled cesarean delivery and normal spontaneous vaginal delivery at university-affiliated hospitals from 2018 to 2023. We included women between 18 and 50 years old at ≥34 weeks of gestation. Subjects were approached in the hospital pre-admission testing unit during their routine pre-operative blood draws, typically at least 72 h in advance of their planned cesarean delivery. Participants were also enrolled at the hospital once they arrived for admission a few hours before their procedure. ROTEM parameters EXTEM clotting time (CT), clot formation time (CFT), alpha angle, A10, A20, maximum clot formation (MCF), maximum lysis, were measured preoperative.ResultsWe found significant effects of age, blood loss type, delivery mode, gestational age, and maximum lysis on blood loss. The reduced model predicted that every one-percent increase in maximum lysis was associated with a 44-milliliter increase in blood loss and every one-year increase in age was associated with a 19-milliliter increase in blood loss. On average, cesarean deliveries resulted in 522 more milliliters of blood loss than normal spontaneous vaginal delivery.ConclusionThe ROTEM EXTEM maximum lysis parameter has a significant effect on blood loss. Larger prospective clinical trials in conjunction with a prompt definition of the ranges of reference values will strengthen these advances to provide a rapid assessment and guide early interventions to prevent severe obstetric bleeding.

产前旋转血栓弹性测量读数与分娩期间产后出血风险的相关性:ROTEM研究。
背景:产后出血(PPH)的定义不一致,以及现有工具和方法无法准确预测PPH,导致了创新方法的探索。旋转血栓弹性测量(ROTEM)点护理技术提供了凝血过程的实时评估,促进了时间效率的止血干预。我们的研究探讨了ROTEM参数在预测PPH个体风险方面的效用。方法:这项多地点、前瞻性观察队列研究招募了2018年至2023年在大学附属医院接受剖宫产和正常自然阴道分娩的92名妇女。我们纳入了年龄在18 - 50岁、妊娠≥34周的妇女。受试者在常规术前抽血期间在医院入院前测试单元接触,通常在计划剖宫产前至少72小时。参与者在手术前几个小时到达医院时也被登记。术前测定ROTEM参数:EXTEM凝血时间(CT)、凝块形成时间(CFT)、α角、A10、A20、最大凝块形成(MCF)、最大溶解。结果:年龄、失血类型、分娩方式、胎龄、最大溶解对出血量有显著影响。简化后的模型预测,最大酵解每增加1%,就会增加44毫升的失血,年龄每增加一年,就会增加19毫升的失血。平均而言,剖腹产比自然阴道分娩多出522毫升的出血量。结论:ROTEM EXTEM最大溶解参数对出血量有显著影响。更大规模的前瞻性临床试验,结合迅速确定参考值范围,将加强这些进展,提供快速评估和指导早期干预措施,以预防严重产科出血。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine
Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信