Rethinking Psychotherapy Training and Supervision: The Case for Deliberate Practice.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Alexandre Vaz, Julia McLeod, Helene A Nissen-Lie
{"title":"Rethinking Psychotherapy Training and Supervision: The Case for Deliberate Practice.","authors":"Alexandre Vaz, Julia McLeod, Helene A Nissen-Lie","doi":"10.1002/jclp.23777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychotherapy supervision research has led to mixed, often disappointing results as to its effects on clinicians' skills acquisition and final treatment outcomes. Put simply, it is unclear if traditional supervision methods reliably increase therapist effectiveness. To answer this longstanding challenge, Deliberate Practice (DP) is now increasingly being recognized by leading authors and researchers as an effective method for enhancing therapists' skills. Despite this growing agreement about the potential advantages of DP methods, there remains a shortage of research, guidelines and real-world case presentations for their implementation in clinical supervision. In this introductory paper, we present an issue of the Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session that showcases diverse modalities and approaches through which DP can be integrated into clinical supervision. To set the stage, this paper presents the major definitions, research evidence, and potential benefits and challenges of a DP-informed psychotherapy supervision. We highlight that while available research is promising, much is still needed to elevate the promise of DP into an evidence-based learning method that reliable increases therapist's skills and outcomes. As such, we conclude with a call encouraging clinicians, trainers and researchers alike to experiment with the methods here described and contribute to this exciting new development in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23777","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psychotherapy supervision research has led to mixed, often disappointing results as to its effects on clinicians' skills acquisition and final treatment outcomes. Put simply, it is unclear if traditional supervision methods reliably increase therapist effectiveness. To answer this longstanding challenge, Deliberate Practice (DP) is now increasingly being recognized by leading authors and researchers as an effective method for enhancing therapists' skills. Despite this growing agreement about the potential advantages of DP methods, there remains a shortage of research, guidelines and real-world case presentations for their implementation in clinical supervision. In this introductory paper, we present an issue of the Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session that showcases diverse modalities and approaches through which DP can be integrated into clinical supervision. To set the stage, this paper presents the major definitions, research evidence, and potential benefits and challenges of a DP-informed psychotherapy supervision. We highlight that while available research is promising, much is still needed to elevate the promise of DP into an evidence-based learning method that reliable increases therapist's skills and outcomes. As such, we conclude with a call encouraging clinicians, trainers and researchers alike to experiment with the methods here described and contribute to this exciting new development in the field.

再思考心理治疗训练与监督:以刻意练习为例。
心理治疗监督研究对临床医生技能获得和最终治疗结果的影响好坏参半,往往令人失望。简而言之,目前尚不清楚传统的监督方法是否能可靠地提高治疗师的有效性。为了回答这个长期存在的挑战,刻意练习(DP)现在越来越多地被主要作者和研究人员认可为提高治疗师技能的有效方法。尽管越来越多的人认同DP方法的潜在优势,但在临床监督中实施的研究、指南和实际病例报告仍然缺乏。在这篇介绍性的论文中,我们介绍了《临床心理学杂志:会议》的一期,展示了DP可以整合到临床监督中的多种模式和方法。在此基础上,本文介绍了主要的定义,研究证据,以及dp知情心理治疗监督的潜在好处和挑战。我们强调,虽然现有的研究是有希望的,但仍需要将DP的承诺提升为一种基于证据的学习方法,以可靠地提高治疗师的技能和结果。因此,我们呼吁临床医生、培训师和研究人员都尝试这里描述的方法,并为这一令人兴奋的新发展做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Journal of Clinical Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信