Optimized control of gas temperature and relative humidity during non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants: A simple and low-cost intervention.

Q2 Medicine
Karina Segatto, Renata Monteiro Weigert, Mariane Ferreira da Silveira, Fabiano Frâncio, Kelen Salvagni, Simone Caldeira Silva, Sergio Tadeu Martins Marba, Guilherme Sant'Anna
{"title":"Optimized control of gas temperature and relative humidity during non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants: A simple and low-cost intervention.","authors":"Karina Segatto, Renata Monteiro Weigert, Mariane Ferreira da Silveira, Fabiano Frâncio, Kelen Salvagni, Simone Caldeira Silva, Sergio Tadeu Martins Marba, Guilherme Sant'Anna","doi":"10.1177/19345798241291348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> During non-invasive respiratory support, administration of gases at high flow rates requires proper air conditioning to avoid upper airways complications. However, closed-loop control of temperature & relative humidity (T&RH) of mixed gases systems with wired-heated circuits are not commonly available in low-middle income countries (LMIC). Thus, a policy for close control of gas T&RH to overcome our system limitations was implemented. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of this intervention.<b>Method:</b> Single center retrospective study including preterm infants admitted to a level II unit (June 2019-2020). Close control of gas T&RH was implemented in Dec 2019 and consisted of starting with the heater at a set number higher than previously and followed by adjustments every 6 h based on intermittent temperature checks (target: 36.5°C-37°C). Humidity was controlled by adjusting the water level every 6 h and checking for the presence of condensation. Two groups were identified: infants treated with or without the close T&RH control. Primary outcome was the occurrence of nasal bleeding. Secondary outcomes were adherence to the policy, need to change the original mode of respiratory support or endotracheal intubation. Appropriate statistical tests were applied.<b>Results:</b> A total of 128 neonates were included: 63 managed without and 65 with close gas T&RH control. Rates of nasal bleeding decreased significantly with the close T&RH control, from 30% to 14% (<i>p</i> = 0.026) despite longer duration of non-invasive support (CPAP: 1.8 ± 1.9 vs 4.3 ± 5.8 days; <i>p</i> = 0.002 and NIPPV: 1.8 ± 1.4 vs 4.2 ± 5.2; <i>p</i> = 0.009). Adherence to the policy was 93%. Changes of the original mode of respiratory support also decreased significantly (14% vs 3%; 0.024) with no intubation.<b>Conclusion:</b> In the absence of advanced and expensive systems, a simple and low-cost intervention to optimize gas T&RH during non-invasive respiratory support in LMIC is feasible and associated with clinical improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":16537,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine","volume":" ","pages":"19345798241291348"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19345798241291348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During non-invasive respiratory support, administration of gases at high flow rates requires proper air conditioning to avoid upper airways complications. However, closed-loop control of temperature & relative humidity (T&RH) of mixed gases systems with wired-heated circuits are not commonly available in low-middle income countries (LMIC). Thus, a policy for close control of gas T&RH to overcome our system limitations was implemented. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of this intervention.Method: Single center retrospective study including preterm infants admitted to a level II unit (June 2019-2020). Close control of gas T&RH was implemented in Dec 2019 and consisted of starting with the heater at a set number higher than previously and followed by adjustments every 6 h based on intermittent temperature checks (target: 36.5°C-37°C). Humidity was controlled by adjusting the water level every 6 h and checking for the presence of condensation. Two groups were identified: infants treated with or without the close T&RH control. Primary outcome was the occurrence of nasal bleeding. Secondary outcomes were adherence to the policy, need to change the original mode of respiratory support or endotracheal intubation. Appropriate statistical tests were applied.Results: A total of 128 neonates were included: 63 managed without and 65 with close gas T&RH control. Rates of nasal bleeding decreased significantly with the close T&RH control, from 30% to 14% (p = 0.026) despite longer duration of non-invasive support (CPAP: 1.8 ± 1.9 vs 4.3 ± 5.8 days; p = 0.002 and NIPPV: 1.8 ± 1.4 vs 4.2 ± 5.2; p = 0.009). Adherence to the policy was 93%. Changes of the original mode of respiratory support also decreased significantly (14% vs 3%; 0.024) with no intubation.Conclusion: In the absence of advanced and expensive systems, a simple and low-cost intervention to optimize gas T&RH during non-invasive respiratory support in LMIC is feasible and associated with clinical improvements.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine
Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信