Privacy, Care-seeking, and Stigma: A Qualitative Investigation of Patient Perspectives on Sharing Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
James Aluri, Evelyn Gurule, Tulha Dobler Siddiqi, Camryn R Upson, Adam D'Sa, Eric C Strain, Denis G Antoine
{"title":"Privacy, Care-seeking, and Stigma: A Qualitative Investigation of Patient Perspectives on Sharing Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records.","authors":"James Aluri, Evelyn Gurule, Tulha Dobler Siddiqi, Camryn R Upson, Adam D'Sa, Eric C Strain, Denis G Antoine","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine, among persons with substance use disorders (SUDs), how their decision-making to seek care is influenced by concerns about the privacy of their treatment records, how they weigh the risks and benefits of record sharing, and their awareness of how records are shared and regulated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study followed the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research and analyzed semi-structured interviews of 13 men and 14 women recruited from inpatient and residential SUD treatment programs. Due to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, recruitment took place over an extended period (between May 2020 and July 2023). Interview transcripts were analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis. Saturation was checked using established quantitative methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants reported that privacy concerns about their records were not a significant factor in the decision to seek treatment. Participants identified many benefits to record sharing, and stigma was viewed as a primary risk. Several women reported that health care professionals, particularly in emergency or perinatal care contexts, treated them differently or negatively after learning about their substance use history. Most participants were unaware of how their substance use treatment records were protected or who had access to their records.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sharing of SUD treatment records with health care professionals was generally viewed positively and privacy concerns did not appear to deter participants from seeking care. Stigma was a concern among participants, especially women. The unawareness of how records are shared highlights the need to better engage persons with SUDs in clinical conversations about their records.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001460","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To examine, among persons with substance use disorders (SUDs), how their decision-making to seek care is influenced by concerns about the privacy of their treatment records, how they weigh the risks and benefits of record sharing, and their awareness of how records are shared and regulated.

Methods: This qualitative study followed the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research and analyzed semi-structured interviews of 13 men and 14 women recruited from inpatient and residential SUD treatment programs. Due to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, recruitment took place over an extended period (between May 2020 and July 2023). Interview transcripts were analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis. Saturation was checked using established quantitative methods.

Results: Most participants reported that privacy concerns about their records were not a significant factor in the decision to seek treatment. Participants identified many benefits to record sharing, and stigma was viewed as a primary risk. Several women reported that health care professionals, particularly in emergency or perinatal care contexts, treated them differently or negatively after learning about their substance use history. Most participants were unaware of how their substance use treatment records were protected or who had access to their records.

Conclusions: Sharing of SUD treatment records with health care professionals was generally viewed positively and privacy concerns did not appear to deter participants from seeking care. Stigma was a concern among participants, especially women. The unawareness of how records are shared highlights the need to better engage persons with SUDs in clinical conversations about their records.

隐私、求医和病耻感:一项关于分享物质使用障碍治疗记录的患者观点的定性调查。
目的:研究在物质使用障碍(sud)患者中,他们寻求治疗的决策如何受到对其治疗记录隐私的担忧的影响,他们如何权衡记录共享的风险和利益,以及他们对如何共享和监管记录的认识。方法:本定性研究遵循定性研究报告标准,对从住院和住院SUD治疗项目中招募的13名男性和14名女性进行半结构化访谈。由于2019冠状病毒病大流行的爆发,招聘工作进行了很长一段时间(2020年5月至2023年7月)。访谈记录采用定性专题分析进行分析。饱和度用既定的定量方法测定。结果:大多数参与者报告说,他们记录的隐私问题并不是决定寻求治疗的重要因素。参与者确定了记录共享的许多好处,污名被视为主要风险。一些妇女报告说,保健专业人员,特别是在急诊或围产期护理方面,在了解她们的药物使用历史后,对她们采取不同的或消极的态度。大多数参与者不知道他们的药物使用治疗记录是如何受到保护的,也不知道谁能看到他们的记录。结论:与卫生保健专业人员分享SUD治疗记录通常是积极的,隐私问题似乎并没有阻止参与者寻求治疗。污名是参与者,尤其是女性担心的问题。对如何共享记录的不了解突出了需要更好地让患有sud的人参与有关其记录的临床对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Journal of Addiction Medicine 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
260
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Addiction Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, is to promote excellence in the practice of addiction medicine and in clinical research as well as to support Addiction Medicine as a mainstream medical sub-specialty. Under the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board, peer-reviewed articles published in the Journal focus on developments in addiction medicine as well as on treatment innovations and ethical, economic, forensic, and social topics including: •addiction and substance use in pregnancy •adolescent addiction and at-risk use •the drug-exposed neonate •pharmacology •all psychoactive substances relevant to addiction, including alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, marijuana, opioids, stimulants and other prescription and illicit substances •diagnosis •neuroimaging techniques •treatment of special populations •treatment, early intervention and prevention of alcohol and drug use disorders •methodological issues in addiction research •pain and addiction, prescription drug use disorder •co-occurring addiction, medical and psychiatric disorders •pathological gambling disorder, sexual and other behavioral addictions •pathophysiology of addiction •behavioral and pharmacological treatments •issues in graduate medical education •recovery •health services delivery •ethical, legal and liability issues in addiction medicine practice •drug testing •self- and mutual-help.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信