{"title":"Implantation of Autologous Skeletal Muscle-Derived Cells Combined with Electrical Stimulation in Patients with Stress Urinary Incontinence.","authors":"Achim Rose, Herbert Rübben","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06079-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Intrasphincteric injection of autologous skeletal muscle-derived cells (aSMDCs) is a minimally invasive treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). This study investigated two cell counts (high/low dose) for functional urethral sphincter regeneration in combination with electrical stimulation, treatment safety and efficacy, and its potential superiority to duloxetine-placebo or duloxetine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This phase II, placebo-controlled trial randomised women with SUI to cell implantation (low or high cell number) and to control groups (duloxetine-placebo or duloxetine), each treatment combined with electrical stimulation. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean reduction of incontinence episode frequency (IEF) at 12 weeks post-treatment compared with baseline. Secondary efficacy parameters included 1-h pad test, visual analogue scale (VAS), Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire, clinical global impression score and frequency of responders based on IEF. Adverse events were analysed for safety evaluation. Additional follow-up data on IEF and selected secondary efficacy variables were obtained in a sub-population of patients after 12 and 48 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean reduction ± SD in IEF after 12 weeks was: low cells: -16.4 ± 13.3 (61 patients), high cells: -18.5 ± 18.7 (56), placebo: -9.7 ± 13.7 (68), duloxetine -11.2 ± 19.6 (32). Cell treatments were significantly superior over placebo regarding IEF reduction and all secondary endpoints except for VAS. No safety issues were observed following cell implantation. Improvements were sustained over 12 and 48 months, with no difference between low and high cell implantation groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therapy for SUI with aSMDCs in combination with electrical stimulation is safe, effective and sustained over at least 48 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06079-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: Intrasphincteric injection of autologous skeletal muscle-derived cells (aSMDCs) is a minimally invasive treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). This study investigated two cell counts (high/low dose) for functional urethral sphincter regeneration in combination with electrical stimulation, treatment safety and efficacy, and its potential superiority to duloxetine-placebo or duloxetine.
Methods: This phase II, placebo-controlled trial randomised women with SUI to cell implantation (low or high cell number) and to control groups (duloxetine-placebo or duloxetine), each treatment combined with electrical stimulation. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean reduction of incontinence episode frequency (IEF) at 12 weeks post-treatment compared with baseline. Secondary efficacy parameters included 1-h pad test, visual analogue scale (VAS), Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire, clinical global impression score and frequency of responders based on IEF. Adverse events were analysed for safety evaluation. Additional follow-up data on IEF and selected secondary efficacy variables were obtained in a sub-population of patients after 12 and 48 months.
Results: The mean reduction ± SD in IEF after 12 weeks was: low cells: -16.4 ± 13.3 (61 patients), high cells: -18.5 ± 18.7 (56), placebo: -9.7 ± 13.7 (68), duloxetine -11.2 ± 19.6 (32). Cell treatments were significantly superior over placebo regarding IEF reduction and all secondary endpoints except for VAS. No safety issues were observed following cell implantation. Improvements were sustained over 12 and 48 months, with no difference between low and high cell implantation groups.
Conclusions: Therapy for SUI with aSMDCs in combination with electrical stimulation is safe, effective and sustained over at least 48 months.
期刊介绍:
The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion