Implantation of Autologous Skeletal Muscle-Derived Cells Combined with Electrical Stimulation in Patients with Stress Urinary Incontinence.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Achim Rose, Herbert Rübben
{"title":"Implantation of Autologous Skeletal Muscle-Derived Cells Combined with Electrical Stimulation in Patients with Stress Urinary Incontinence.","authors":"Achim Rose, Herbert Rübben","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06079-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Intrasphincteric injection of autologous skeletal muscle-derived cells (aSMDCs) is a minimally invasive treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). This study investigated two cell counts (high/low dose) for functional urethral sphincter regeneration in combination with electrical stimulation, treatment safety and efficacy, and its potential superiority to duloxetine-placebo or duloxetine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This phase II, placebo-controlled trial randomised women with SUI to cell implantation (low or high cell number) and to control groups (duloxetine-placebo or duloxetine), each treatment combined with electrical stimulation. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean reduction of incontinence episode frequency (IEF) at 12 weeks post-treatment compared with baseline. Secondary efficacy parameters included 1-h pad test, visual analogue scale (VAS), Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire, clinical global impression score and frequency of responders based on IEF. Adverse events were analysed for safety evaluation. Additional follow-up data on IEF and selected secondary efficacy variables were obtained in a sub-population of patients after 12 and 48 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean reduction ± SD in IEF after 12 weeks was: low cells: -16.4 ± 13.3 (61 patients), high cells: -18.5 ± 18.7 (56), placebo: -9.7 ± 13.7 (68), duloxetine -11.2 ± 19.6 (32). Cell treatments were significantly superior over placebo regarding IEF reduction and all secondary endpoints except for VAS. No safety issues were observed following cell implantation. Improvements were sustained over 12 and 48 months, with no difference between low and high cell implantation groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therapy for SUI with aSMDCs in combination with electrical stimulation is safe, effective and sustained over at least 48 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06079-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Intrasphincteric injection of autologous skeletal muscle-derived cells (aSMDCs) is a minimally invasive treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). This study investigated two cell counts (high/low dose) for functional urethral sphincter regeneration in combination with electrical stimulation, treatment safety and efficacy, and its potential superiority to duloxetine-placebo or duloxetine.

Methods: This phase II, placebo-controlled trial randomised women with SUI to cell implantation (low or high cell number) and to control groups (duloxetine-placebo or duloxetine), each treatment combined with electrical stimulation. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean reduction of incontinence episode frequency (IEF) at 12 weeks post-treatment compared with baseline. Secondary efficacy parameters included 1-h pad test, visual analogue scale (VAS), Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire, clinical global impression score and frequency of responders based on IEF. Adverse events were analysed for safety evaluation. Additional follow-up data on IEF and selected secondary efficacy variables were obtained in a sub-population of patients after 12 and 48 months.

Results: The mean reduction ± SD in IEF after 12 weeks was: low cells: -16.4 ± 13.3 (61 patients), high cells: -18.5 ± 18.7 (56), placebo: -9.7 ± 13.7 (68), duloxetine -11.2 ± 19.6 (32). Cell treatments were significantly superior over placebo regarding IEF reduction and all secondary endpoints except for VAS. No safety issues were observed following cell implantation. Improvements were sustained over 12 and 48 months, with no difference between low and high cell implantation groups.

Conclusions: Therapy for SUI with aSMDCs in combination with electrical stimulation is safe, effective and sustained over at least 48 months.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信