Effect of breed composition in genomic prediction using crossbred pig reference population.

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Journal of Animal Science and Technology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.5187/jast.2025.e2
Euiseo Hong, Yoonji Chung, Phuong Thanh N Dinh, Yoonsik Kim, Suyeon Maeng, Young Jae Choi, Jaeho Lee, Woonyoung Jeong, Hyunji Choi, Seung Hwan Lee
{"title":"Effect of breed composition in genomic prediction using crossbred pig reference population.","authors":"Euiseo Hong, Yoonji Chung, Phuong Thanh N Dinh, Yoonsik Kim, Suyeon Maeng, Young Jae Choi, Jaeho Lee, Woonyoung Jeong, Hyunji Choi, Seung Hwan Lee","doi":"10.5187/jast.2025.e2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In contrast to conventional genomic prediction, which typically targets a single breed and circumvents the necessity for population structure adjustments, multi-breed genomic prediction necessitates accounting for population structure to mitigate potential bias. The presence of this structure in multi-breed datasets can influence prediction accuracy, rendering proper modeling crucial for achieving unbiased results. This study aimed to address the effect of population structure on multi-breed genomic prediction, particularly focusing on crossbred reference populations. The prediction accuracy of genomic models was assessed by incorporating genomic breed composition (GBC) or principal component analysis (PCA) into the genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model. The accuracy of five different genomic prediction models was evaluated using data from 354 Duroc × Korean native pig crossbreds, 1,105 Landrace × Korean native pig crossbreds, and 1,107 Landrace × Yorkshire × Duroc crossbreds. The models tested were GBLUP without population structure adjustment, GBLUP with PCA as a fixed effect, GBLUP with GBC as a fixed effect, GBLUP with PCA as a random effect, and GBLUP with GBC as a random effect. The highest prediction accuracies for backfat thickness (0.59) and carcass weight (0.50) were observed in Models 1, 4, and 5. In contrast, Models 2 and 3, which included population structure as a fixed effect, exhibited lower accuracies, with backfat thickness accuracies of 0.40 and 0.53 and carcass weight accuracies of 0.34 and 0.38, respectively. These findings suggest that in multi-breed genomic prediction, the most efficient and accurate approach is either to forgo adjusting for population structure or, if adjustments are necessary, to model it as a random effect. This study provides a robust framework for multi-breed genomic prediction, highlighting the critical role of appropriately accounting for population structure. Moreover, our findings have important implications for improving genomic selection efficiency, ultimately enhancing commercial production by optimizing prediction accuracy in crossbred populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Science and Technology","volume":"67 1","pages":"56-68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2025.e2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In contrast to conventional genomic prediction, which typically targets a single breed and circumvents the necessity for population structure adjustments, multi-breed genomic prediction necessitates accounting for population structure to mitigate potential bias. The presence of this structure in multi-breed datasets can influence prediction accuracy, rendering proper modeling crucial for achieving unbiased results. This study aimed to address the effect of population structure on multi-breed genomic prediction, particularly focusing on crossbred reference populations. The prediction accuracy of genomic models was assessed by incorporating genomic breed composition (GBC) or principal component analysis (PCA) into the genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model. The accuracy of five different genomic prediction models was evaluated using data from 354 Duroc × Korean native pig crossbreds, 1,105 Landrace × Korean native pig crossbreds, and 1,107 Landrace × Yorkshire × Duroc crossbreds. The models tested were GBLUP without population structure adjustment, GBLUP with PCA as a fixed effect, GBLUP with GBC as a fixed effect, GBLUP with PCA as a random effect, and GBLUP with GBC as a random effect. The highest prediction accuracies for backfat thickness (0.59) and carcass weight (0.50) were observed in Models 1, 4, and 5. In contrast, Models 2 and 3, which included population structure as a fixed effect, exhibited lower accuracies, with backfat thickness accuracies of 0.40 and 0.53 and carcass weight accuracies of 0.34 and 0.38, respectively. These findings suggest that in multi-breed genomic prediction, the most efficient and accurate approach is either to forgo adjusting for population structure or, if adjustments are necessary, to model it as a random effect. This study provides a robust framework for multi-breed genomic prediction, highlighting the critical role of appropriately accounting for population structure. Moreover, our findings have important implications for improving genomic selection efficiency, ultimately enhancing commercial production by optimizing prediction accuracy in crossbred populations.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Animal Science and Technology
Journal of Animal Science and Technology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.70%
发文量
96
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Animal Science and Technology (J. Anim. Sci. Technol. or JAST) is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing original research, review articles and notes in all fields of animal science. Topics covered by the journal include: genetics and breeding, physiology, nutrition of monogastric animals, nutrition of ruminants, animal products (milk, meat, eggs and their by-products) and their processing, grasslands and roughages, livestock environment, animal biotechnology, animal behavior and welfare. Articles generally report research involving beef cattle, dairy cattle, pigs, companion animals, goats, horses, and sheep. However, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will also be considered for publication. The Journal of Animal Science and Technology (J. Anim. Technol. or JAST) has been the official journal of The Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) since 2000, formerly known as The Korean Journal of Animal Sciences (launched in 1956).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信