Molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Dissemination of multidrug-resistant community-associated MRSA and emergence of LA-MRSA, in a healthcare setting

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Vijayan Priya, S. Nagarathna, Kumari HB. Veena
{"title":"Molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Dissemination of multidrug-resistant community-associated MRSA and emergence of LA-MRSA, in a healthcare setting","authors":"Vijayan Priya,&nbsp;S. Nagarathna,&nbsp;Kumari HB. Veena","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmmb.2025.100810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Methicillin-resistant <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (MRSA) continues to be a significant cause of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). In this study, we aimed to characterize the MRSA isolates obtained from HAIs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 200 clinical and 13 nasal MRSA isolates were collected and tested. The samples were analyzed for SCC<em>mec</em> typing by using multiplex PCR. Microtiter for biofilm formation were performed and molecular typing for the samples were performed for spa and agr typing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The isolates showed 100 % sensitivity to vancomycin and linezolid, while 92.5 % were multidrug-resistant. Strong biofilm-forming ability was observed in 47 % of the isolates. SCC mec typing identified 52.5 % of the isolates as classical hospital-associated MRSA or HA-MRSA (SCC mec type III), 23.5 % as community-associated MRSA or CA-MRSA (type IV and V), and 16.5 % as non-typeable, with 7.5 % having multiple SCCmec types.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Comparison of HA and CA-MRSA traits revealed that both groups had multidrug resistance, but HA-MRSA was distinguished by its strong capacity for biofilm formation, whereas CA-MRSA was marked by a high count of toxin gene. Our study, to the best of our awareness, documents the presence of LA-MRSA (SCCmec V- t127-agr III) causing HAIs in Indian patients for the first time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13284,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 100810"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0255085725000234","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) continues to be a significant cause of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). In this study, we aimed to characterize the MRSA isolates obtained from HAIs.

Methods

A total of 200 clinical and 13 nasal MRSA isolates were collected and tested. The samples were analyzed for SCCmec typing by using multiplex PCR. Microtiter for biofilm formation were performed and molecular typing for the samples were performed for spa and agr typing.

Results

The isolates showed 100 % sensitivity to vancomycin and linezolid, while 92.5 % were multidrug-resistant. Strong biofilm-forming ability was observed in 47 % of the isolates. SCC mec typing identified 52.5 % of the isolates as classical hospital-associated MRSA or HA-MRSA (SCC mec type III), 23.5 % as community-associated MRSA or CA-MRSA (type IV and V), and 16.5 % as non-typeable, with 7.5 % having multiple SCCmec types.

Conclusion

Comparison of HA and CA-MRSA traits revealed that both groups had multidrug resistance, but HA-MRSA was distinguished by its strong capacity for biofilm formation, whereas CA-MRSA was marked by a high count of toxin gene. Our study, to the best of our awareness, documents the presence of LA-MRSA (SCCmec V- t127-agr III) causing HAIs in Indian patients for the first time.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
73 days
期刊介绍: Manuscripts of high standard in the form of original research, multicentric studies, meta analysis, are accepted. Current reports can be submitted as brief communications. Case reports must include review of current literature, clinical details, outcome and follow up. Letters to the editor must be a comment on or pertain to a manuscript already published in the IJMM or in relation to preliminary communication of a larger study. Review articles, Special Articles or Guest Editorials are accepted on invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信