Progression-free survival as a potential surrogate end point for overall survival in advanced cervical carcinoma.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ramon Yarza, Melpomeni Kountouri, Helena Guedes, Catherine O'Gorman, Jose Manuel Estrada-Lorenzo, Corneel Coens, Judith Kroep, Fernanda Herrera, Ainhoa Madariaga
{"title":"Progression-free survival as a potential surrogate end point for overall survival in advanced cervical carcinoma.","authors":"Ramon Yarza, Melpomeni Kountouri, Helena Guedes, Catherine O'Gorman, Jose Manuel Estrada-Lorenzo, Corneel Coens, Judith Kroep, Fernanda Herrera, Ainhoa Madariaga","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to study the potential of progression-free survival as a surrogate end point for trials evaluating the use of systemic therapy in advanced cervical cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review selecting phase II and III randomized trials including locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic cervical cancer, with mature progression-free survival and overall survival data. Our study adhered to the Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist and was registered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023405604). Exclusions comprised trials involving adjuvant treatment as the primary end point. The magnitude of progression-free survival and overall survival was assessed using standardized z-scores. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on treatment type, line of treatment, and prior radiotherapy exposure. Surrogacy was evaluated according to the recommendations by the Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 studies were included in the final analysis. In the overall population, a moderate correlation between progression-free survival and overall survival was observed (r = 0.75, p < .001). The surrogate threshold effect (STE) indicated a threshold for progression-free survival z-score (z-progression-free survival of 2.53), intersecting with null overall survival outcome (z = 1.96). Subgroup analysis revealed a weak and nonsignificant correlation in chemotherapy trials (r = 0.5, p = .12) with a higher STE (z-progression-free survival = 2.83). Conversely, chemoimmunotherapy combinations exhibited a robust and statistically significant correlation (r = 0.99, p = 0.01) with a lower STE (z-progression-free survival = 2.39). Trials exploring advanced therapy lines demonstrated a higher and more significant correlation (r = 0.98, p = .02) with a lower STE at 2.08, whereas upfront-line therapy trials showed a moderate correlation (r = 0.67, p = 0.01) with an STE magnitude of 2.58.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Progression-free survival exhibits a moderate correlation with a modest STE. For chemoimmunotherapy combinations, there is a strong correlation between overall survival and progression-free survival, with a notably lower STE. This suggests that the relationship between progression-free survival and overall survival may vary significantly based on the treatment strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 2","pages":"100012"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to study the potential of progression-free survival as a surrogate end point for trials evaluating the use of systemic therapy in advanced cervical cancer.

Methods: We performed a systematic review selecting phase II and III randomized trials including locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic cervical cancer, with mature progression-free survival and overall survival data. Our study adhered to the Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist and was registered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023405604). Exclusions comprised trials involving adjuvant treatment as the primary end point. The magnitude of progression-free survival and overall survival was assessed using standardized z-scores. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on treatment type, line of treatment, and prior radiotherapy exposure. Surrogacy was evaluated according to the recommendations by the Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen.

Results: A total of 20 studies were included in the final analysis. In the overall population, a moderate correlation between progression-free survival and overall survival was observed (r = 0.75, p < .001). The surrogate threshold effect (STE) indicated a threshold for progression-free survival z-score (z-progression-free survival of 2.53), intersecting with null overall survival outcome (z = 1.96). Subgroup analysis revealed a weak and nonsignificant correlation in chemotherapy trials (r = 0.5, p = .12) with a higher STE (z-progression-free survival = 2.83). Conversely, chemoimmunotherapy combinations exhibited a robust and statistically significant correlation (r = 0.99, p = 0.01) with a lower STE (z-progression-free survival = 2.39). Trials exploring advanced therapy lines demonstrated a higher and more significant correlation (r = 0.98, p = .02) with a lower STE at 2.08, whereas upfront-line therapy trials showed a moderate correlation (r = 0.67, p = 0.01) with an STE magnitude of 2.58.

Conclusion: Progression-free survival exhibits a moderate correlation with a modest STE. For chemoimmunotherapy combinations, there is a strong correlation between overall survival and progression-free survival, with a notably lower STE. This suggests that the relationship between progression-free survival and overall survival may vary significantly based on the treatment strategy.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信