Intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics using multi-phase contrast-enhanced CT for diagnosis of renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Frontiers in Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fonc.2025.1501084
Yongsong Ye, Bei Weng, Yan Guo, Lesheng Huang, Shanghuang Xie, Guimian Zhong, Wenhui Feng, Wenxiang Lin, Zhixuan Song, Huanjun Wang, Tianzhu Liu
{"title":"Intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics using multi-phase contrast-enhanced CT for diagnosis of renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.","authors":"Yongsong Ye, Bei Weng, Yan Guo, Lesheng Huang, Shanghuang Xie, Guimian Zhong, Wenhui Feng, Wenxiang Lin, Zhixuan Song, Huanjun Wang, Tianzhu Liu","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2025.1501084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To construct diagnostic models that distinguish renal oncocytoma (RO) from chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (CRCC) using intratumoral and peritumoral radiomic features from the corticomedullary phase (CMP) and nephrographic phase (NP) of computed tomography, and compare model results with manual and radiological results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The RO and CRCC cases from five centers were split into a training set (70%) and a validation set (30%). CMP and NP intratumoral and peritumoral (1-3 mm) radiomic features were extracted. Segmentation was performed by radiologists and software. Features with high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC>0.75) were selected through univariate analysis, followed by the LASSO method to determine the final features for the SVM model. All images were assessed by two radiologists, and radiological reports were also examined. The diagnostic performances of the different methods were compared using several statistical methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The training set had 65 cases (29 RO, 36 CRCC) and the validation set had 27 cases (12 RO, 15 CRCC). All the training models had excellent performance (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.828-0.942); the AUC values of the validation models ranged from 0.900 (Model 4) to 0.600 (Model 2). CMP models (AUC: 0.811-0.900) generally outperformed NP and fusion models (AUC: 0.728-0.756). SVM models (sensitivity: 62.50-88.89%; specificity: 63.16-77.78%; accuracy: 62.96-81.48%) outperformed manual diagnosis (sensitivity: 46.74-70.59%; specificity: 41.67-46.34%; accuracy: 52.27-59.78%). The clinical reports alone had no diagnostic value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CMP intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics models reliably distinguished RO from CRCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1501084"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11835681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1501084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To construct diagnostic models that distinguish renal oncocytoma (RO) from chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (CRCC) using intratumoral and peritumoral radiomic features from the corticomedullary phase (CMP) and nephrographic phase (NP) of computed tomography, and compare model results with manual and radiological results.

Methods: The RO and CRCC cases from five centers were split into a training set (70%) and a validation set (30%). CMP and NP intratumoral and peritumoral (1-3 mm) radiomic features were extracted. Segmentation was performed by radiologists and software. Features with high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC>0.75) were selected through univariate analysis, followed by the LASSO method to determine the final features for the SVM model. All images were assessed by two radiologists, and radiological reports were also examined. The diagnostic performances of the different methods were compared using several statistical methods.

Results: The training set had 65 cases (29 RO, 36 CRCC) and the validation set had 27 cases (12 RO, 15 CRCC). All the training models had excellent performance (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.828-0.942); the AUC values of the validation models ranged from 0.900 (Model 4) to 0.600 (Model 2). CMP models (AUC: 0.811-0.900) generally outperformed NP and fusion models (AUC: 0.728-0.756). SVM models (sensitivity: 62.50-88.89%; specificity: 63.16-77.78%; accuracy: 62.96-81.48%) outperformed manual diagnosis (sensitivity: 46.74-70.59%; specificity: 41.67-46.34%; accuracy: 52.27-59.78%). The clinical reports alone had no diagnostic value.

Conclusion: CMP intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics models reliably distinguished RO from CRCC.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Oncology
Frontiers in Oncology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cancer Research
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.60%
发文量
6641
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis is dedicated to the publication of results from clinical and research studies applied to cancer diagnosis and treatment. The section aims to publish studies from the entire field of cancer imaging: results from routine use of clinical imaging in both radiology and nuclear medicine, results from clinical trials, experimental molecular imaging in humans and small animals, research on new contrast agents in CT, MRI, ultrasound, publication of new technical applications and processing algorithms to improve the standardization of quantitative imaging and image guided interventions for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信