Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Frontiers in Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fonc.2025.1498887
Ziting Peng, Jianhui Dong, Shuyao Tang, Jiaxu Shi, Tongdong Shi
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.","authors":"Ziting Peng, Jianhui Dong, Shuyao Tang, Jiaxu Shi, Tongdong Shi","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2025.1498887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of PD-1 and PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in managing advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of treatment data for patients with advanced ICC who received ICIs at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from the inception of the inpatient medical record database until 30 April 2024. The analysis concentrated on the safety and efficacy of the treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. The Kaplan-Meier method was employed to plot survival curves, and differences between groups were assessed using log-rank tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>96 patients diagnosed with ICC were included, comprising 60 males (62.50%) and 36 females (37.50%). 85 patients exhibited disease progression, 22 patients succumbed, and 38 patients were lost to follow-up finally. Those who initiated immunotherapy promptly following first-line antitumor treatment exhibited a notably prolonged PFS compared to those experiencing tumor progression (5.63 months (<i>95%CI:</i> 3.12~8.14) vs 2.50 months (<i>95%CI:</i> 1.83~3.17), <i>P=</i>0.002). However, no significant disparity in the PFS with immunotherapy in different lines therapy(<i>P=</i>0.406) and the OS was observed between the two groups(<i>P=</i>0.360). 18 patients (18.75%) experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), with 3 patients encountering AEs of grade ≥3. All patients returned to normal after symptomatic treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with advanced ICC, the timely initiation of ICIs as adjuvant therapy following first-line antitumor treatment can result in favorable efficacy and a good safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1498887"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11835659/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1498887","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To assess the efficacy and safety of PD-1 and PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in managing advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

Methods: A retrospective analysis of treatment data for patients with advanced ICC who received ICIs at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from the inception of the inpatient medical record database until 30 April 2024. The analysis concentrated on the safety and efficacy of the treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. The Kaplan-Meier method was employed to plot survival curves, and differences between groups were assessed using log-rank tests.

Results: 96 patients diagnosed with ICC were included, comprising 60 males (62.50%) and 36 females (37.50%). 85 patients exhibited disease progression, 22 patients succumbed, and 38 patients were lost to follow-up finally. Those who initiated immunotherapy promptly following first-line antitumor treatment exhibited a notably prolonged PFS compared to those experiencing tumor progression (5.63 months (95%CI: 3.12~8.14) vs 2.50 months (95%CI: 1.83~3.17), P=0.002). However, no significant disparity in the PFS with immunotherapy in different lines therapy(P=0.406) and the OS was observed between the two groups(P=0.360). 18 patients (18.75%) experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), with 3 patients encountering AEs of grade ≥3. All patients returned to normal after symptomatic treatment.

Conclusions: In patients with advanced ICC, the timely initiation of ICIs as adjuvant therapy following first-line antitumor treatment can result in favorable efficacy and a good safety profile.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Oncology
Frontiers in Oncology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cancer Research
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.60%
发文量
6641
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis is dedicated to the publication of results from clinical and research studies applied to cancer diagnosis and treatment. The section aims to publish studies from the entire field of cancer imaging: results from routine use of clinical imaging in both radiology and nuclear medicine, results from clinical trials, experimental molecular imaging in humans and small animals, research on new contrast agents in CT, MRI, ultrasound, publication of new technical applications and processing algorithms to improve the standardization of quantitative imaging and image guided interventions for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信