The use of pre-endoscopic metoclopramide in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Syed Muhammad Mehdi Zaidi, Mustafa Hassan Alvi, Qunoot Irfan, Laraib Abbasi, Muhammad Zohair, Zainab Abbas, Ahsan Qyoum, Rabee Danish
{"title":"The use of pre-endoscopic metoclopramide in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Syed Muhammad Mehdi Zaidi, Mustafa Hassan Alvi, Qunoot Irfan, Laraib Abbasi, Muhammad Zohair, Zainab Abbas, Ahsan Qyoum, Rabee Danish","doi":"10.1097/MEG.0000000000002927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a critical condition with an incidence of 80-150 cases per 100 000 annually and a mortality rate of 2-15%. Endoscopy is crucial for diagnosis and treatment. Prokinetic agents like metoclopramide are studied for their potential to improve visualization by promoting gastric motility. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of intravenous metoclopramide in enhancing endoscopic visualization and clinical outcomes in UGIB patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus up to July 2024. We included randomized controlled trials involving UGIB patients who received intravenous metoclopramide vs placebo. Primary outcome was endoscopy visualization score (EMV). Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4. This review was registered in PROSPERO RD42024552979.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies with 515 patients were included. The pooled analysis for overall EMV scores indicated significant improvement in metoclopramide group [standardized mean difference 0.47 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.12-0.82)]. Repeat endoscopy showed no significant difference 0.70 (95% CI: 0.38-1.29). The mean difference for hospital stay was minimal and not significant [mean difference -0.06 (95% CI: -0.24 to 0.12)]. The mean number of red blood cell transfusions was slightly higher but not significant [mean difference 0.04 (95% CI: -0.14 to 0.22)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intravenous metoclopramide before endoscopy in UGIB patients improved EMV scores, while the other clinical outcomes were not significant. These findings suggest potential benefits of metoclopramide in UGIB, highlighting the need for further research with larger studies to confirm its effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":11999,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000002927","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a critical condition with an incidence of 80-150 cases per 100 000 annually and a mortality rate of 2-15%. Endoscopy is crucial for diagnosis and treatment. Prokinetic agents like metoclopramide are studied for their potential to improve visualization by promoting gastric motility. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of intravenous metoclopramide in enhancing endoscopic visualization and clinical outcomes in UGIB patients.

Materials and methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus up to July 2024. We included randomized controlled trials involving UGIB patients who received intravenous metoclopramide vs placebo. Primary outcome was endoscopy visualization score (EMV). Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4. This review was registered in PROSPERO RD42024552979.

Results: Five studies with 515 patients were included. The pooled analysis for overall EMV scores indicated significant improvement in metoclopramide group [standardized mean difference 0.47 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.12-0.82)]. Repeat endoscopy showed no significant difference 0.70 (95% CI: 0.38-1.29). The mean difference for hospital stay was minimal and not significant [mean difference -0.06 (95% CI: -0.24 to 0.12)]. The mean number of red blood cell transfusions was slightly higher but not significant [mean difference 0.04 (95% CI: -0.14 to 0.22)].

Conclusion: Intravenous metoclopramide before endoscopy in UGIB patients improved EMV scores, while the other clinical outcomes were not significant. These findings suggest potential benefits of metoclopramide in UGIB, highlighting the need for further research with larger studies to confirm its effectiveness.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
269
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology publishes papers reporting original clinical and scientific research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes three types of manuscript: in-depth reviews (by invitation only), full papers and case reports. Manuscripts submitted to the journal will be accepted on the understanding that the author has not previously submitted the paper to another journal or had the material published elsewhere. Authors are asked to disclose any affiliations, including financial, consultant, or institutional associations, that might lead to bias or a conflict of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信