Raising a child bereaved by domestic homicide: caregivers' experiences.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Eva Alisic, Arend Groot, Hanneke Snetselaar, Tielke Stroeken
{"title":"Raising a child bereaved by domestic homicide: caregivers' experiences.","authors":"Eva Alisic, Arend Groot, Hanneke Snetselaar, Tielke Stroeken","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2463277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Optimising support for children and families affected by fatal family violence requires understanding all aspects of their experience. So far, little is known regarding the views of those who provide a home to children bereaved due to parental intimate partner homicide.<b>Objective:</b> The aim of the current study was to provide an in-depth exploration of the experiences of caregivers raising children after the loss of a parent due to intimate partner homicide.<b>Method:</b> Within the context of a mixed-methods study among 22 caregivers (16 female, 6 male, aged 33 to 71 years old) related to 35 children and young people (19 female, 16 male), bereaved due to parental intimate partner homicide in the Netherlands, we conducted a reflexive thematic analysis of the qualitative caregiver interviews.<b>Results:</b> Based on caregivers' accounts, we conceptualised four interrelated and ongoing challenges: (1) bringing the children into the family fold; (2) dealing with the perpetrator and relatives; (3) managing underprepared services; and (4) enduring it, mentally and physically. Sticking with their commitment to the children despite these challenges, caregivers also pointed to the potential for positive outcomes or turns of events, and recounted experiences of finding or making meaning.<b>Conclusions:</b> The complexity of the challenges the caregivers in our study faced and their remarkable commitment and perseverance underscore the importance of concerted, continuing efforts to understand and respond to families' needs in the aftermath of parental intimate partner homicide. We discuss practical implications regarding caregivers' assessment of children's needs, mental health care, information provision and agency, mediation of family conflict, provision of respite care, addressing financial and practical needs, and long-term and equitable access to support. We also propose a research agenda involving evaluation of current protocols, in-depth qualitative research, quantitative analyses (where possible based on pooled data), and intervention studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2463277"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2463277","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Optimising support for children and families affected by fatal family violence requires understanding all aspects of their experience. So far, little is known regarding the views of those who provide a home to children bereaved due to parental intimate partner homicide.Objective: The aim of the current study was to provide an in-depth exploration of the experiences of caregivers raising children after the loss of a parent due to intimate partner homicide.Method: Within the context of a mixed-methods study among 22 caregivers (16 female, 6 male, aged 33 to 71 years old) related to 35 children and young people (19 female, 16 male), bereaved due to parental intimate partner homicide in the Netherlands, we conducted a reflexive thematic analysis of the qualitative caregiver interviews.Results: Based on caregivers' accounts, we conceptualised four interrelated and ongoing challenges: (1) bringing the children into the family fold; (2) dealing with the perpetrator and relatives; (3) managing underprepared services; and (4) enduring it, mentally and physically. Sticking with their commitment to the children despite these challenges, caregivers also pointed to the potential for positive outcomes or turns of events, and recounted experiences of finding or making meaning.Conclusions: The complexity of the challenges the caregivers in our study faced and their remarkable commitment and perseverance underscore the importance of concerted, continuing efforts to understand and respond to families' needs in the aftermath of parental intimate partner homicide. We discuss practical implications regarding caregivers' assessment of children's needs, mental health care, information provision and agency, mediation of family conflict, provision of respite care, addressing financial and practical needs, and long-term and equitable access to support. We also propose a research agenda involving evaluation of current protocols, in-depth qualitative research, quantitative analyses (where possible based on pooled data), and intervention studies.

抚养因家庭谋杀而失去的孩子:看护人的经历。
背景:优化对受致命家庭暴力影响的儿童和家庭的支持需要了解他们经历的各个方面。到目前为止,对于那些为因父母亲密伴侣谋杀而失去亲人的孩子提供住所的人的观点,我们知之甚少。目的:本研究旨在深入探讨因亲密伴侣谋杀而失去父母的照顾者抚养孩子的经验。方法:在一项混合方法研究的背景下,我们对荷兰因父母亲密伴侣杀人而失去亲人的35名儿童和年轻人(19名女性,16名男性)的22名照顾者(16名女性,6名男性)进行了一项反身性主题分析。结果:根据照顾者的描述,我们概念化了四个相互关联且持续的挑战:(1)将儿童带入家庭;(二)处理行为人及其亲属的;(3)管理准备不足的服务;(4)在精神上和身体上忍受它。尽管面临这些挑战,但照顾者仍坚持对孩子的承诺,他们还指出了积极结果或事件转折的可能性,并讲述了发现或创造意义的经历。结论:在我们的研究中,照顾者所面临的挑战的复杂性以及他们非凡的承诺和毅力强调了协调一致、持续努力理解和回应父母亲密伴侣被杀后家庭需求的重要性。我们讨论了关于照顾者对儿童需求的评估、心理健康护理、信息提供和代理、家庭冲突的调解、临时护理的提供、解决经济和实际需求以及长期和公平获得支持的实际意义。我们还提出了一个研究议程,包括对当前协议的评估、深入的定性研究、定量分析(在可能的情况下基于汇总数据)和干预研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信