Association Between Smoking Status and Prevalence of Advanced Outcomes in Patients With and Without Positive Stool Test Prior to Colonoscopy: Data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Joseph C Anderson, William M Hisey, Christina M Robinson, Paul J Limburg, Bonny L Kneedler, Lynn F Butterly
{"title":"Association Between Smoking Status and Prevalence of Advanced Outcomes in Patients With and Without Positive Stool Test Prior to Colonoscopy: Data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.","authors":"Joseph C Anderson, William M Hisey, Christina M Robinson, Paul J Limburg, Bonny L Kneedler, Lynn F Butterly","doi":"10.1007/s10620-025-08918-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Our goal was to examine the association between smoking status (current, former, and never) and prevalence of advanced findings in patients with colonoscopy after a positive multi-target stool DNA test (mt-sDNA), patients with colonoscopy after a positive Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT), and patients with colonoscopy only (no prior stool test).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our main outcome was prevalence of advanced lesions (any colorectal cancer (CRC), advanced adenoma, or advanced serrated polyp). We also looked at advanced adenomas and advanced serrated polyps separately. We performed logistic regressions comparing findings by smoking status within mt-sDNA + , FIT + , and colonoscopy-only patients, adjusting for age, sex, and CRC risk. We also performed logistic regressions within all current smokers comparing outcome odds between each screening method cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our sample included 967 mt-sDNA + , 498 FIT + , and 58,682 colonoscopy-only patients. Within the FIT + (OR = 2.46; 95%CI 1.16-5.26) and mt-sDNA + (OR = 1.65; 95%CI 1.05-2.59) groups, current smokers had higher odds of advanced serrated polyps than never-smokers (reference). In addition, FIT + current smokers (OR = 1.97; 95%CI 1.11-3.50) or mt-sDNA (OR = 3.27; 95%CI 2.25-4.74) current smokers had higher odds of advanced lesions than colonoscopy-only smokers (reference).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within stool-test-positive patients, current smokers have higher odds of advanced serrated polyps than never-smokers, reinforcing the heightened importance of a follow-up colonoscopy in smokers with positive stool tests. We also found higher yields of advanced outcomes in FIT + and mt-sDNA + smokers vs. smokers who underwent colonoscopy without a prior stool test. Endoscopists need to be particularly vigilant in detecting advanced serrated polyps in patients who smoke and have a positive stool test.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-08918-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Our goal was to examine the association between smoking status (current, former, and never) and prevalence of advanced findings in patients with colonoscopy after a positive multi-target stool DNA test (mt-sDNA), patients with colonoscopy after a positive Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT), and patients with colonoscopy only (no prior stool test).

Methods: Our main outcome was prevalence of advanced lesions (any colorectal cancer (CRC), advanced adenoma, or advanced serrated polyp). We also looked at advanced adenomas and advanced serrated polyps separately. We performed logistic regressions comparing findings by smoking status within mt-sDNA + , FIT + , and colonoscopy-only patients, adjusting for age, sex, and CRC risk. We also performed logistic regressions within all current smokers comparing outcome odds between each screening method cohort.

Results: Our sample included 967 mt-sDNA + , 498 FIT + , and 58,682 colonoscopy-only patients. Within the FIT + (OR = 2.46; 95%CI 1.16-5.26) and mt-sDNA + (OR = 1.65; 95%CI 1.05-2.59) groups, current smokers had higher odds of advanced serrated polyps than never-smokers (reference). In addition, FIT + current smokers (OR = 1.97; 95%CI 1.11-3.50) or mt-sDNA (OR = 3.27; 95%CI 2.25-4.74) current smokers had higher odds of advanced lesions than colonoscopy-only smokers (reference).

Conclusions: Within stool-test-positive patients, current smokers have higher odds of advanced serrated polyps than never-smokers, reinforcing the heightened importance of a follow-up colonoscopy in smokers with positive stool tests. We also found higher yields of advanced outcomes in FIT + and mt-sDNA + smokers vs. smokers who underwent colonoscopy without a prior stool test. Endoscopists need to be particularly vigilant in detecting advanced serrated polyps in patients who smoke and have a positive stool test.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信