Reduced-volume radiotherapy versus conventional-volume radiotherapy after induction chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An open-label, noninferiority, multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial.

IF 503.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Ling-Long Tang, Lin Chen, Gui-Qiong Xu, Ning Zhang, Cheng-Long Huang, Wen-Fei Li, Yan-Ping Mao, Guan-Qun Zhou, Feng Lei, Lu-Si Chen, Shao Hui Huang, Lei Chen, Yu-Pei Chen, Yuan Zhang, Xu Liu, Cheng Xu, Yin Zhao, Ji-Bin Li, Na Liu, Fang-Yun Xie, Rui Guo, Ying Sun, Jun Ma
{"title":"Reduced-volume radiotherapy versus conventional-volume radiotherapy after induction chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An open-label, noninferiority, multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial.","authors":"Ling-Long Tang, Lin Chen, Gui-Qiong Xu, Ning Zhang, Cheng-Long Huang, Wen-Fei Li, Yan-Ping Mao, Guan-Qun Zhou, Feng Lei, Lu-Si Chen, Shao Hui Huang, Lei Chen, Yu-Pei Chen, Yuan Zhang, Xu Liu, Cheng Xu, Yin Zhao, Ji-Bin Li, Na Liu, Fang-Yun Xie, Rui Guo, Ying Sun, Jun Ma","doi":"10.3322/caac.21881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nearly 90% locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC) responds to induction chemotherapy (IC) with significant tumor volume shrinkage. Radiotherapy always follows IC, and reduced volume has been proposed. However, the efficacy and safety of reduced-volume radiotherapy is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multi-center, noninferiority, randomized, controlled trial, patients with LANPC who completed IC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive reduced-volume radiotherapy based on post-IC tumor volume (Post-IC group) or conventional volume radiotherapy based on pre-IC tumor volume (Pre-IC group). The primary endpoint was locoregional relapse-free survival, with a noninferiority margin of 8%. Secondary endpoints comprised adverse events, and quality of life (QoL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between August 7, 2020, and May 27, 2022, 445 patients were randomly assigned to Post-IC (n = 225) or Pre-IC (n = 220) groups. The average volume receiving radical dose was 66.6 cm<sup>3</sup> in Post-IC group versus 80.9 cm<sup>3</sup>. After a median follow-up of 40.4 months, the 3-year locoregional relapse-free survival was 91.5% in the Post-IC group versus 91.2%, with a difference of 0.3% (95% confidence interval -4.9% to 5.5%). The incidence of grade 3-4 radiation-related toxicity was lower in the Post-IC group including: acute mucositis (19.8% vs 34.1%), late otitis media (9.5% vs 20.9%) and late dry month (3.6% vs 9.5%). The Post-IC group had better QoL for global health status, physical functioning, emotional functioning, dry mouth and sticky saliva.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this trial, reduced-volume radiotherapy was noninferior to conventional volume radiotherapy in locoregional relapse-free survival, and was associated with lower toxicities and improved QoL. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04384627).</p>","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":503.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21881","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nearly 90% locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC) responds to induction chemotherapy (IC) with significant tumor volume shrinkage. Radiotherapy always follows IC, and reduced volume has been proposed. However, the efficacy and safety of reduced-volume radiotherapy is uncertain.

Methods: In this multi-center, noninferiority, randomized, controlled trial, patients with LANPC who completed IC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive reduced-volume radiotherapy based on post-IC tumor volume (Post-IC group) or conventional volume radiotherapy based on pre-IC tumor volume (Pre-IC group). The primary endpoint was locoregional relapse-free survival, with a noninferiority margin of 8%. Secondary endpoints comprised adverse events, and quality of life (QoL).

Results: Between August 7, 2020, and May 27, 2022, 445 patients were randomly assigned to Post-IC (n = 225) or Pre-IC (n = 220) groups. The average volume receiving radical dose was 66.6 cm3 in Post-IC group versus 80.9 cm3. After a median follow-up of 40.4 months, the 3-year locoregional relapse-free survival was 91.5% in the Post-IC group versus 91.2%, with a difference of 0.3% (95% confidence interval -4.9% to 5.5%). The incidence of grade 3-4 radiation-related toxicity was lower in the Post-IC group including: acute mucositis (19.8% vs 34.1%), late otitis media (9.5% vs 20.9%) and late dry month (3.6% vs 9.5%). The Post-IC group had better QoL for global health status, physical functioning, emotional functioning, dry mouth and sticky saliva.

Conclusions: In this trial, reduced-volume radiotherapy was noninferior to conventional volume radiotherapy in locoregional relapse-free survival, and was associated with lower toxicities and improved QoL. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04384627).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
873.20
自引率
0.10%
发文量
51
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians" has been published by the American Cancer Society since 1950, making it one of the oldest peer-reviewed journals in oncology. It maintains the highest impact factor among all ISI-ranked journals. The journal effectively reaches a broad and diverse audience of health professionals, offering a unique platform to disseminate information on cancer prevention, early detection, various treatment modalities, palliative care, advocacy matters, quality-of-life topics, and more. As the premier journal of the American Cancer Society, it publishes mission-driven content that significantly influences patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信