Attitudes and Preferences Towards Screening for Dementia From the Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals: An Updated Systematic Review

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Ríona Mc Ardle, Abigail Dsouza, Alexander Hagan, Amani Al-Oraibi, Matilda Hanjari, Blossom C. M. Stephan, Carol Brayne, Louise Lafortune, Manpreet Bains, Nadeem Qureshi, Louise Robinson
{"title":"Attitudes and Preferences Towards Screening for Dementia From the Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals: An Updated Systematic Review","authors":"Ríona Mc Ardle,&nbsp;Abigail Dsouza,&nbsp;Alexander Hagan,&nbsp;Amani Al-Oraibi,&nbsp;Matilda Hanjari,&nbsp;Blossom C. M. Stephan,&nbsp;Carol Brayne,&nbsp;Louise Lafortune,&nbsp;Manpreet Bains,&nbsp;Nadeem Qureshi,&nbsp;Louise Robinson","doi":"10.1002/gps.70057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Approximately 55 million people are living with dementia globally. Global policies have suggested that screening for dementia in asymptomatic populations may support risk-reduction approaches to stem the rising numbers of people with the condition. A previous systematic review of literature up to 2012 indicated that healthcare professionals negatively view dementia screening; however, the research and clinical landscape has made significant advances in the last decade. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to re-examine the attitudes and preferences of healthcare professionals since 2012 regarding primary and community care-based dementia screening.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This review was pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024531455) and followed PRISMA guidelines. Key terms relevant to the aim were input into six databases, and articles between 2012 and 2024 were considered. Titles, abstracts and full texts were independently screened by two reviewers. Articles were eligible for inclusion if peer-reviewed, written in English, considered primary or community care-based dementia screening and included healthcare perspectives from either quantitative or qualitative methods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>From 18,732 identified titles, 19 articles were included in this review. Seventeen studies presented perspectives from primary care practitioners. Key findings suggest that healthcare professionals have mixed views regarding their willingness to conduct dementia screening, although limited studies suggest an interest in engaging in dementia risk reduction. Common influences on perspectives included knowledge, skills and training; resource provision; access to a dedicated screening service and referral pathways; and stigma.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These findings suggest that healthcare professionals' perspectives and resource are not aligned with international policies promoting dementia screening. When considering implementing evidence-based dementia screening in the future, a dedicated screening service is recommended.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"40 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gps.70057","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gps.70057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Approximately 55 million people are living with dementia globally. Global policies have suggested that screening for dementia in asymptomatic populations may support risk-reduction approaches to stem the rising numbers of people with the condition. A previous systematic review of literature up to 2012 indicated that healthcare professionals negatively view dementia screening; however, the research and clinical landscape has made significant advances in the last decade. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to re-examine the attitudes and preferences of healthcare professionals since 2012 regarding primary and community care-based dementia screening.

Methods

This review was pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024531455) and followed PRISMA guidelines. Key terms relevant to the aim were input into six databases, and articles between 2012 and 2024 were considered. Titles, abstracts and full texts were independently screened by two reviewers. Articles were eligible for inclusion if peer-reviewed, written in English, considered primary or community care-based dementia screening and included healthcare perspectives from either quantitative or qualitative methods.

Results

From 18,732 identified titles, 19 articles were included in this review. Seventeen studies presented perspectives from primary care practitioners. Key findings suggest that healthcare professionals have mixed views regarding their willingness to conduct dementia screening, although limited studies suggest an interest in engaging in dementia risk reduction. Common influences on perspectives included knowledge, skills and training; resource provision; access to a dedicated screening service and referral pathways; and stigma.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that healthcare professionals' perspectives and resource are not aligned with international policies promoting dementia screening. When considering implementing evidence-based dementia screening in the future, a dedicated screening service is recommended.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The rapidly increasing world population of aged people has led to a growing need to focus attention on the problems of mental disorder in late life. The aim of the Journal is to communicate the results of original research in the causes, treatment and care of all forms of mental disorder which affect the elderly. The Journal is of interest to psychiatrists, psychologists, social scientists, nurses and others engaged in therapeutic professions, together with general neurobiological researchers. The Journal provides an international perspective on the important issue of geriatric psychiatry, and contributions are published from countries throughout the world. Topics covered include epidemiology of mental disorders in old age, clinical aetiological research, post-mortem pathological and neurochemical studies, treatment trials and evaluation of geriatric psychiatry services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信