The Scoring Model to Predict ICU Stay and Mortality After Emergency Admissions in Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Study of 30 366 Patients

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Tao Hong, Jian Huang, Jiewen Deng, Lirong Kuang, Mengyan Sun, Qianqian Wang, Chao Luo, Jikai Zhao, Xiaozhu Liu, Huishan Wang
{"title":"The Scoring Model to Predict ICU Stay and Mortality After Emergency Admissions in Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Study of 30 366 Patients","authors":"Tao Hong,&nbsp;Jian Huang,&nbsp;Jiewen Deng,&nbsp;Lirong Kuang,&nbsp;Mengyan Sun,&nbsp;Qianqian Wang,&nbsp;Chao Luo,&nbsp;Jikai Zhao,&nbsp;Xiaozhu Liu,&nbsp;Huishan Wang","doi":"10.1002/clc.70101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The rapid assessment of the conditions is crucial for the prognosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients admitted to the emergency department (ED). We aim to derive and validate a more accurate and simplified scoring model to optimize the triage of AF patients in the ED.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a retrospective study using data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database and developed scoring models employing the Random Forest algorithm. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to measure the performance of the prediction for intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and the death likelihood within 3, 7, and 30 days following the ED admission.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study included 30 366 AF patients, randomly divided into training, validation, and testing cohorts at a 7:1:2 ratio. The training set consisted of 21 257 patients, the validation set included 3036 patients, and the remaining 6073 patients were classified as the validation set. Among the cohorts, 9594 patients (32%) required ICU transfers, with mortality rates of 1% at 3 days, 3% at 7 days, and 6% at 30 days. In the testing set, the scoring models demonstrated strong discriminative ability with AUCs of 0.724 for ICU stay, 0.782 for 3-day mortality, 0.755 for 7-day mortality, and 0.767 for 30-day mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We derived and validated novel simplified scoring models with good discriminative performance to predict the likelihood of ICU stay, 3-day, 7-day, and 30-day death in AF patients after ED admission.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"48 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70101","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The rapid assessment of the conditions is crucial for the prognosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients admitted to the emergency department (ED). We aim to derive and validate a more accurate and simplified scoring model to optimize the triage of AF patients in the ED.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a retrospective study using data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database and developed scoring models employing the Random Forest algorithm. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to measure the performance of the prediction for intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and the death likelihood within 3, 7, and 30 days following the ED admission.

Results

The study included 30 366 AF patients, randomly divided into training, validation, and testing cohorts at a 7:1:2 ratio. The training set consisted of 21 257 patients, the validation set included 3036 patients, and the remaining 6073 patients were classified as the validation set. Among the cohorts, 9594 patients (32%) required ICU transfers, with mortality rates of 1% at 3 days, 3% at 7 days, and 6% at 30 days. In the testing set, the scoring models demonstrated strong discriminative ability with AUCs of 0.724 for ICU stay, 0.782 for 3-day mortality, 0.755 for 7-day mortality, and 0.767 for 30-day mortality.

Conclusion

We derived and validated novel simplified scoring models with good discriminative performance to predict the likelihood of ICU stay, 3-day, 7-day, and 30-day death in AF patients after ED admission.

Abstract Image

30366例房颤急诊入院后ICU住院时间和死亡率预测的评分模型
背景快速评估病情对急诊科(ED)心房颤动(AF)患者的预后至关重要。我们的目标是推导和验证一个更准确和简化的评分模型,以优化急诊科房颤患者的分类。材料和方法我们使用重症监护医学信息市场(MIMIC-IV)数据库的数据进行了回顾性研究,并采用随机森林算法开发了评分模型。采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)来衡量重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间的预测效果,以及ED入院后3、7和30天内死亡可能性的预测效果。结果本研究纳入30366例房颤患者,按7:1:2的比例随机分为训练组、验证组和测试组。训练集包括21 257例患者,验证集包括3036例患者,其余6073例患者被分类为验证集。在队列中,9594例患者(32%)需要转至ICU, 3天死亡率为1%,7天死亡率为3%,30天死亡率为6%。在检验集中,评分模型表现出较强的判别能力,ICU住院auc为0.724,3天死亡率auc为0.782,7天死亡率auc为0.755,30天死亡率auc为0.767。结论我们推导并验证了新的简化评分模型,该模型具有良好的判别性能,可预测房颤患者入院后ICU住院、3天、7天和30天死亡的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Cardiology
Clinical Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Cardiology provides a fully Gold Open Access forum for the publication of original clinical research, as well as brief reviews of diagnostic and therapeutic issues in cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular surgery. The journal includes Clinical Investigations, Reviews, free standing editorials and commentaries, and bonus online-only content. The journal also publishes supplements, Expert Panel Discussions, sponsored clinical Reviews, Trial Designs, and Quality and Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信